Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Score9.1 out of 10
N/A
Based on the former Coremetrics, IBM Digital Analytics is a discontinued analytics product. IBM acquired Coremetrics in 2010, and re-branded the platform to the IBM Digital Marketing Optimization Solution. Product support was ultimately provided by Acoustic, but the product is not a part of the company's plans going forward.
N/A
HCL Unica
Score10 out of 10
N/A
HCL Unica is available as a cloud or on-premise solution that provides fully integrated marketing automation software for enterprise. It includes enterprise marketing automation tools that optimize marketing activities, to ensure excellent customer experiences and data privacy.
N/A
Pricing
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
HCL Unica
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
HCLSoftware
No answer on this topic
Key User Insights
Would buy again
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Delivers good value for the price
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Happy with the feature set
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Lived up to sales and marketing promises
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Features
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
HCL Unica
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and HCL Unica
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
HCL Unica
9.6
3 Ratings
22% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Landing pages
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
A/B testing
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
9.53 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and HCL Unica
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
HCL Unica
9.7
2 Ratings
20% above category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Lead segmentation and distribution
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and HCL Unica
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
HCL Unica
9.4
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Calendaring
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and HCL Unica
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
HCL Unica
9.7
2 Ratings
25% above category average
Social sharing and campaigns
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and HCL Unica
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
HCL Unica
9.7
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued) and HCL Unica
Feature
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
-
Ratings
HCL Unica
9.6
2 Ratings
23% above category average
API
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Role-based workflow & approvals
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Customizability
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Integration with Microsoft Dynamics CRM
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Third-party software integrations
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued)
HCL Unica
Likelihood to Recommend
Discontinued Products
IBM analytics has continued to improve upon the days of being the original core metrics. After using the updated version for quite some time, it has been great at providing the needed analytics to measure ROI and goal performance for our quarterly KPI's. It has resulted in a great increase in web engagements although we are a midsize company, smaller outfits may not need such an expensive option.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think it is wel suited for a business with a lot of one on one relations in the database. For example a supermarket that sells products to a client and gives a reduction on that product. It is nice if the selection process is not to complex and does not involve to many calculations. It is also nice if it is very clear what you want to follow up. In our environment we have lots of many-to-many relations. for example one product is held by more then one client. And that client might have more of those products with other clients. These kind of situation demands for a lot of calculations with derived fields(*), and there things go far too slow. Unica is probably not such a good solution for us, because our environment is too complex, and so is to process of creating the selection, we often have to change things in the selection flows. Because of the complexity it is difficult to see what the flow is exactly doing afterwoods, it also takes to much time to modify existing campaigns. The interface is not handy to work with, if you have long lists of variables, of tables or derived fields(*) you have to scroll through trough them, you can not really search them or reorder them. You can not drag and drop fields or other objects like derived fields in the flow, what would be easy if you have to make frequent changes to the proces flow. When you copy objects something the content of the object changes because the links with other objects or lost. (*) derived field: field to calculate something
IBM CXA comprises an acquisition called Tealeaf. This tool has deep heritage and this is evident in its present-day capabilities.
The Universal Behaviour Exchange or UBX puts the concept of personalisation at the forefront. The ability to combine physical (analog) and digital transactions to create the complete picture of a customer journey, is a stand out benefit.
The solution does not have to involve the purchase of software. IBM CXA can be sold as a service bundled with analytics as a service. This not only lowers the cost of ownership, it gets around one of the principal issues. Strong staff with design and analytical capability to drive the solution and deliver tangible benefits.
The seamless integration of Watson AI services to help with the heavy lifiting. Watson reinforces the analytical focus this solution has and can learn to recognise situations specific to a company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Ability to translate Multiple SQL queries into a very easy to use visual GUI.
Provides the ability to pre-define segments, run them once in off hours, store them in their own system tables for quick youth and a significant reduction in CPU utilization on the database.
It’s use of Reusable objects. Including user variables to pre-define calculations one time, macros that you can create and pass values to parameterize the SQL code And the creation of templates to easily replicate work.
It’s ability to bring in external data on the fly that can very easily be mapped into any flowchart.
It’s flexibility and creating UNIX script via triggers to automate sending of files to multiple vendors with different FTP sites
It’s flexibility in the output layouts that it can create.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The user interface is in Flash, which can be very frustrating and slow at times. Apparently, this is to be transitioned in a future release.
Can only segment the last 93 days of data. Any historical segmentation beyond the 93 days must be run in Explore (which is credit based, and has its own limitations with the number of credits per month, based on the initial contract with IBM).
Reports can only display 93 days of data at a given time for custom date ranges. There are pre-programmed date ranges setup with IBM during implementation (last week, last month, last quarter etc.), but are not flexible enough to answer more specific questions.
Certain reports cannot have segments applied, making answering some simple questions a bit more tricky. For example, I can create a segment around mobile devices and apply it to the marketing channels report, but I can't create a marketing channel segment and apply it to the mobile reports.
Built in API calls allows for nice report design and automation.
Greater integration of real time (Interact) capabilities with outbound channels, in particular IBM eMessage Email & SMS delivery.
Additional outbound channels to be integrated into eMessage, including Facebook Fanpage & Twitter DM broadcasts. At the moment these are possible only through custom additional integration.
Support for additional marketing database technology, e.g. MySQL, Exasol, ParAccel, WX2.
Provision of database technology with software purchase, as Web technology (IBM WebSphere Express) is supplied for free, but no database is supplied - since IBM also market DB2, which is a supported technology it seems a shame.
IBM Digital Analytics is a great solution for our clients and I believe they offer the best solution for the retail space. We have access to IBM support via email or live chat and they can answer many of the reporting questions that come up. IBM is receptive to our feedback of the product so I am confident they will continue making improvements
There are three main factors to renew a licence: 1) Cost to migrate to another platform would be rather expensive and time consuming, plus the requirement of retraining employees to use a new tool 2) It has been proven time and time again that it is a market leader in the space (10 years +) 3) It can be built upon, with the addition of additional IBM EMM modules - despite theories it does have very strong digital capabilities.
Unica provides functionality that is very simple and easy to use. For reporting, we can see Unica system tables. Contact history table, response history tables. We have all the information in one place. Performance-wise, Unica also handles large volumes of data and can run a 5-million-record campaign within minutes. This is something great.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As reports are templated, the system is pretty quick. Sometimes you have to wait a bit for a report to render. Or you might have to re-load the page. But there is no real issue here and the system is on par with other similar systems.
Overall, the level of support is very good and I would say it is a strong asset of the solution. However, you can sometimes feel that there is a difference of level among the support team.
Online training is really great. One of the best assets that they have. Lots of great videos, pop quizzes at the end of each module. Fantastic. Other tools have similar features, but not as good.
- We had to rebuild a part of the datamart afterwards to tighten up and simplify the selection process. But as it was too time consuming to rebuild all the existing campaigns, we no run campaigns on different versions of the datamart. - The response tracking of the campaigns never worked out well, it was impossible to implement a direct response where there is a link between the lead and the response in our operational process
Much of the work we did in IBM Digital Analytics could have been answered through Google Analytics, a much simpler, agile and FREE solution set. Not mention, given the vast number of Google Analytics USERS, free and actionable support is simply a click away ... this compared to IBM Digital Analytics fractured and often absent support service.
The contact history and the response history are so powerful. You can track whatever you want to help the call center to push relevant offers to our customer. In addition, predictive models can be built, with patience, in IBM Campaign. If you have some complaints from the call center about any campaigns, you can easily validate it into the contact or response history.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This solution can support large amount of data and transaction. The way that user management features are built, it shows it is meant for large organizations.
We spend too much time trying to work around bugs on the new UI.
We spend too much time trying to figure out how to make certain segments work because support and the knowledge center are lackluster.
Our sales rep is very unresponsive and leaves us searching for a lot of answers on our own, including what other products we may benefit from that IBM offers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info