Corezoid Actor Engine vs. Okta Workflows

Corezoid Actor Engine

Corezoid Actor Engine

0 Reviews and Ratings

Okta Workflows

Okta Workflows

84 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Corezoid Actor Engine	Score 0.0 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Corezoid Process Engine - a tool to build, manage, host, and run processes in the cloud without coding. The platform aism to increase time-to-market speed and decreases maintenance costs by shifting the paradigm from hardcoding processes by software engineers to assembling processes by any non-tech people. Corezoid Process Engine benefits for each team member: 1. Managers can set up their own real-time dashboards and escalations in just a few clicks to stay up to date…	$30
Okta Workflows	Score 7.7 out of 10	N/A	Azuqua was a tool that helped users integrate their SaaS applications and build custom automations. It was acquired by Okta in late 2019, and is now part of Okta Workflows. Okta Workflows leverages Azuqua’s workflow orchestration engine and application integrations to automate complex identity-centric processes such as user onboarding and offboarding. The product is available as part of the Okta Lifecycle Management…	N/A

Pricing

Corezoid Actor Engine

Okta Workflows

Editions & Modules

XS: $30.00

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Corezoid Actor Engine	Okta Workflows
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

$30

Optional

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Corezoid Actor Engine	Okta Workflows
Considered Both Products	Corezoid Actor Engine No answer on this topic	Okta Workflows Verified User Anonymous Chose Okta Workflows I think Okta is so much more complete and FUB is more only sales oriented instead of Customer Service, with Okta you can call, chat, get in contact internally with other departments, and do different things to solve customer issue. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Okta Workflows We have not used other products similar to Okta. Incentivized Helpful? Brooke Addams Process and Resource Manager Chose Okta Workflows I evaluated Zapier and Microsoft Flow before coming across Azuqua. Zapier was too simplistic and didn't allow for transfer of enough variables. The price point also didn't work for the value it could provide. Microsoft Flow couldn't make the connection with Smartsheet, and I … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Okta Workflows Stampley - on the surface they look similar, but I came across this alternative after integrating with Azuqua so I haven't fully evaluated it against Azuqua. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Okta Workflows None, Azuqua seemed to do what we needed. Incentivized Helpful? Mark Schlanser Lead Architect Chose Okta Workflows Azuqua handles multi-stream processes very well, however provides some nuances with connecting data. Incentivized Helpful? Justin Farr, CPA Senior Accountant Chose Okta Workflows I did not look into any other products. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Okta Workflows Zapier primarily, I prefer the workflow creation in Azuqua. The UI is very user friendly. Incentivized Helpful? HD Hakela Davalos Energy Analyst & Systems Specialist Chose Okta Workflows N/A Incentivized Helpful? Scott Neylon Chief Operating Officer Chose Okta Workflows I have used Mulesoft, Workato, my own code and in past years heavyweight data (e.g. ETL) platforms along with a number of bus technologies. In this case, I was looking for the cloud-based approach that matches our strategy of being totally cloud-focused along with simpler … Incentivized Helpful? Travis Abdelhamed Process Analyst Chose Okta Workflows Azuqua was much more intuitive than Zapier and was easier to understand and comprehend. Incentivized Helpful? Suparman Widjaja Technology Manager Chose Okta Workflows Low entry cost and maintenance cost. Incentivized Helpful? J. D. Ridenour Tier 2 Technical Support Chose Okta Workflows Azuqua was the first application we assessed for our purposes, and served our needs so well that we felt no need to search further. It gave us the solutions we needed in a way that was easy to set up and maintain, and the support we received was above and beyond expectations, … Incentivized Helpful? Scott Davis Digital Asset Management Specialist Chose Okta Workflows I had to use the Automate tool for funneling image assets in bulk (tens of thousands) from FTPs into various destinations on an eCommerce platform. The user interface was quite harsh in comparison to Azuqua. Far more text/code line driven. Incentivized Helpful? Guillermo Garate Operations Manager Chose Okta Workflows I have not used or evaluated other platforms. Incentivized Helpful? Loïc Engulu Senior Sales Operations Analyst Chose Okta Workflows Azuqua offered the most customization of the other platforms we tried. While it was comparably intuitive to use, in terms of entry level, Azuqua maintained this intuitiveness at higher levels of sophistication/integration whereas the other platforms either lacked the same logic … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Okta Workflows Azuqua was more intuitive. Incentivized Helpful? Derek Visch Lead Infrastructure Engineer Chose Okta Workflows IFTTT / Zapier - There really isn't a comparison as Azuqua allows for full customization of your flows and IFTTT and Zapier do not. Talend Open Studio is built more for doing database / file integrations and it can do API calls. Talend is much bigger but cannot accomplish what … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Okta Workflows We have not used another tool besides Azuqua to help us solve these business needs. Incentivized Helpful? Julie Leonard Marketing Operations Manager Chose Okta Workflows Smartsheet notifications is the main competitor for what we use Azuqua for. When we got Azuqua, there was no competitor and Smartsheet actually recommended it as the solution. Now, we split up the work between the 2 tools and use Smartsheet for the easier notifications and … Incentivized Helpful? Hoon Kim Creative Production Manager Chose Okta Workflows Easy to build out complex if/then scenarios and fire of multiple other workflows within one workflow. Like the UI of seeing how data is being utilizes, ported, and manipulated across the workflows. Also like the workflow history for optimization as well as troubleshooting. Raw … Incentivized Helpful? Treacy Seeley Director of Ad Operations Chose Okta Workflows I evaluated another platform, but I can't recall their name. ServiceRocket didn't work. I tried to integrate with them, but it was a mess and a waste of time. The other platform was 10x as expensive at Azuqua. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Okta Workflows Azuqua was the only product we looked at in this space. Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Corezoid Actor Engine	Okta Workflows
Small Businesses	CMW Platform Score 9.4 out of 10	CMW Platform Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Quixy Score 9.9 out of 10	Quixy Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises	Redwood RunMyJobs Score 9.7 out of 10	CMW Platform Score 9.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Corezoid Actor Engine	Okta Workflows
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Corezoid Actor Engine	Okta Workflows
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	The integration I used Azuqua for was based on Salesforce, Wrike and Office 365. I found the integration of Salesforce reasonably straightforward, Wrike was limited in the "cards" capability but functional (there are bugs but there are also workarounds but they required assistance from the Azuqua support team) and Office 365 was quite immature (primarily around Excel bugs but also email was limited). Incentivized Scott Neylon Chief Operating Officer Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	The best part about Azuqua is that you do not need to write code. You do however need to have an understanding of logic and how the software works. This happens to fit me perfectly as someone with basic programming experience. Their Support is second to none. Not only are they extremely quick and responsive, but their answers are never canned responses and always provide valuable content. They seem to take feedback seriously and will continue to evolve and make a better product. Incentivized Travis Abdelhamed Process Analyst Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	I think it requires an easy way to migrate flows created from one user to then move the ownership to another user. It happened to us that one of our engineers left the company and he had the Azuqua account and flows. It required quite some time, cases and telephone calls to do the migration to my account. Incentivized Guillermo Garate Operations Manager Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	The system is working as it should, keeping our programs safe from outside hackers. Helping us keep our passwords safe, convenient and already ready to get us logged into the program securely and quickly. Verification that only authorized users are able to access our company's programs. Okta Workflows (Azuqua) is a very good system that has helped our company greatly. Incentivized CA Corey Anderson Staff Accountant Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	I evaluated Zapier and Microsoft Flow before coming across Azuqua. Zapier was too simplistic and didn't allow for transfer of enough variables. The price point also didn't work for the value it could provide. Microsoft Flow couldn't make the connection with Smartsheet, and I was unable to get Microsoft support or Smartsheet support to assist me with the issue. Incentivized Brooke Addams Process and Resource Manager Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Increased time savings. We could not function as a matter of daily business if we did not have a tool to automate project folders (and complementary workflow management profiles) for the thousands of projects that flow through daily. Opens up a greater understanding of all the silos and divisions within the company infrastructure and tests secure means to link those groups safely and share information. Opens up the chance to communicate with other API information sources if our company is doing a partnership with another organization. Granted everything is square with IT security. Incentivized Scott Davis Digital Asset Management Specialist Read full review
ScreenShots	Corezoid Actor Engine Screenshots