CrossKnowledge Learning Suite vs Skilljar

• CrossKnowledge provides learning content across a wide array of subjects, and this content is delivered using various delivery methods (interactive e-learning, videos, reading material, activity journals, etc.)
• CrossKnowledge’s learning suite makes it easy to set up and roll out a highly customised learning management system.
• CrossKnowledge offers a mobile app that makes it easy to access both the learning management system as well as their learning content on the go.

Read full review

• The design is simple. If you're looking for a complex or beautiful platform, this isn't it. However, Skilljar makes things very easy to follow and build within.
• Navigating Skilljar is very logical. it is easy to set up a new course and navigate within that course.

Read full review

• As a learning management system, CrossKnowledge’s backend is missing several key features for learning administrators
• It is immensely difficult to set up learning events and managing invitations to learners
• Reporting is extremely limited: you can only see the reports that CrossKnowledge seems necessary; you have very limited customisation options, and many of the basic reporting functions are simply impossible

Read full review

• It would be nice for a learner to instantly know which courses they are enrolled in.
• Analytics are decent, but I rely on other data management tools to share with others.
• It would be great to be able to include rich media files such as videos inside of text lessons.

Read full review

• It’s extremely difficult to evaluate ROI of a tool like CrossKnowledge, but it’s only been a little over a year since we rolled it out across the organisation and we’ve already made it part of our performance management system

Read full review

• Externally, our clients are able to sign up for training and complete a structured learning path to learn our product, as well as be able to refer back to the structured/organized training materials when needed. It's been widely adopted among our client base which certainly takes less time ($$) from our AM's when it comes to training.
• Internally, our training is viewed as much more efficient. Just that, in itself, shows ROI in terms of time spent training as well as employee retention. (Note: I haven't looked at data to see if employee retention is better - just speculating here.)

Read full review