Curata's content marketing platform (Curata CMP) enables more efficient content creation with greater impact on pipeline. According to the vendor, this solution enables users to:
Analyze marketing and sales pipeline impact: Instantly access content metrics such as leads generated/touched and sales opportunities generated/touched by gated, un-gated and off-site content. Streamline content production: An easy to use editorial calendar to keep your team on the same page and…
$699
per Instance (no seat limits)
OpenText Magellan
Score9 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
N/A
Pricing
Curata
OpenText Magellan
Editions & Modules
Curata Software
$699
per Instance (no seat limits)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Curata
OpenText Magellan
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
We have 2 solutions:
- Curata CCS content curation software
- Curata CMP content marketing platform (e.g., editorial calendar, analytics engine)
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Curata
OpenText Magellan
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Curata and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Curata
8.3
1 Ratings
6% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Ideation
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval workflows
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content collaboration
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content calendar
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Curata and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Curata
8.0
2 Ratings
2% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Content hub
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embedded CTAs
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content distribution
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content promotion
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content automation
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Curata and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Curata
8.3
2 Ratings
12% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Closed-loop tracking and reporting
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content performance analytics
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Competitive analytics
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Curata and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Curata
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Curata and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Curata
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
4% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Curata and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Curata
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Curata and OpenText Magellan
I liked Curata, but it depends on the use case of how it will be used as to how effective it is for someone. If you are trying to curate content it works great. Had I not been so put off by the issue mentioned earlier I would have given more effort to learn the CMS, so I am not sure how effective it really is.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
Curata is great at curating in content that is relevant to our audience. It is easy to add many different sources to the feed from all around the web and we've really seen Curata "learn" what we see as the most relevant.
The microsite we got as part of our Curata subscription is really fantastic. It's very customizable and we've been able to really craft it to suit our needs. There are so many different options available and our Curata rep has been really great with helping us cater each piece to our vision while making helpful suggestions along the way in terms of best practices. Plus, the word processor for publishing blog posts is so easy to use and I've had no issues with it so far unlike many other CMS platforms I've worked with. The Curata microsite is actually going to be replacing our current blog very soon - we love it that much!
I've had a great experience with customer service from Curata. Our rep is responsive and helpful and really good about not just answering our concerns but also providing feedback on our processes and giving advice for how we can improve.
Search capabilities within the curated content feed are fabulous. This is one area where I found other solutions to be lacking when we were going through the sales process, but Curata really succeeds here. It's extremely easy to find exactly what you're looking for in your content feed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For all of the features we loved when we signed on like the microsite and search capabilities and also their customer service, we will very likely renew with Curata. We also really like the evolution we have seen of the solution, just recently a new integration with Marketo (also a vendor of ours) was announced which will be very beneficial to us in optimizing our email newsletters
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The main difference that made me choose Curata over Percolate is that it is not complex. Curata is easier to set up, to use, and to manage. It does not involve any complicated configuration to get the content and data you need. Curata technical support is amazing, to say the least. I am not an expert in the technical stuff, but I feel assured their team can help me out when I have an issue
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.