Cvent Hotel RFP Management vs. Responsive

For me, I'm in a college town so when we have a tournament we get flooded with RFPs from schools for the same dates. Lead Scoring allows me to see which of the leads is better suited for our needs over those dates. For example, a school that only wants to stay for one night because they are only an hour away is less desirable than a school that has to fly in and needs to stay for 4 nights!

Incentivized

Responsive is well suited for bid response teams and organizations that often respond to RFPs, but also for organizations looking to have access to information from their large library of documents, presentations, and images using AI and a chat bot that serves their internal organization to respond to clients faster and more accurately

Incentivized

• Leverage real data and analytics to inform your strategy.
• Consider setting up more than one lead scoring model.
• Focus on high-value website actions and engagements.
• Don't assign points for every email open.
• Use negative attributes/scoring to avoid inflated scores.

Incentivized

• Manages structure responses well
• Manages permissions from the various users that access the solution
• Allows for a global deployment with built in language capabilities
• Allows for 100% visibility into the RFx process for all stakeholders
• Allows for ease of answering via ML that has been built in

Incentivized

• \New channels, mediums and metrics influencing the customer journey are introduced every day.
• Committing to a lead scoring model that doesn't dynamically adjust as your customers do, will produce inaccuracies.
• Without manually adjusting on a regular basis, miscalculations won't be addressed in a timely manner.

Incentivized

• Analysis Tools: although what is provided is quite good, there is definitely room for improvement. For instance it would be nice if it were easier/quicker for each evaluator to record their notes/comments when scoring, and to be able to search through those notes/comments later. Also, it would be really helpful to be able to annotate/mark-up the actual responses (highlight, underline, circle, call-out notes, etc.), with such mark-up tracked by evaluator, and with the option to hide/show mark-up.
• Results Analysis, Reporting, and Presentation: in my opinion, this is the only area of weakness in RFP360. There are very limited options, after scoring/evaluation of responses is completed, for generating reports, graphs, charts, etc. to be used in evaluating results and presenting to the end client. I've always had to export the scores and use Excel to create the necessary visuals for final analysis and presentation.
• Complex Questions: RFP360's ability to handle complex RFP questions (e.g. involving tables, charts, multi-part answers, graphics, etc.) is limited, and existing capabilities in this area are fairly cumbersome to navigate and use.

Incentivized

We'd be sunk without Responsive. The sales motion would slow way down in several places, and that's just unacceptable. AND I love the product. It helps me do my job efficiently. The Responsive team is GREAT. Support is getting better. The Product and Customer Experience Team is so knowledgeable and willing to help with new features and troubleshoot what's going on. It's an all-around great experience. Not to mention starting over - I can't even get my head around that.

Incentivized

Very easy to navigate and use. Very intuitive user interface

Incentivized

Cvent is well suited for planners and those they are planning with to distribute and receive RFP to a variety of locations and venues. Wonderful!

Incentivized

If I cannot solve a problem, then I reach out to Support and they are ON IT. They always solve the problem and get back to me immediately with an answer. Our customer support person who is assigned to us (we have had several) are responsive and helpful. We have asked them to sit in on meetings and help socialize the tool.

Incentivized

We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.

There are no other products like Cvent Lead Scoring that I have used or evaluated. The reason for this is because I've never had to stray from Lead Scoring, because it has been so beneficial.

I didn't select a tool, so I'm not sure what else is available in the market beyond Loopio, which we used previously. It's been at least 2 years since I last used Loopio, so it might be inaccurate at this point, but Responsive's AI seems much better at providing a specific answer to your question and is less general.

Incentivized

• Summary Lead. A summary lead is the most common and traditional lead in journalism.
• Single-Item Lead. This lead focuses on just one or two elements of a summary lead.
• Delayed Identification Lead.
• Creative Lead.
• Short Sentence Lead.
• Analogy Lead.

Incentivized

• Increased revenue - with our ability to respond to more proposals, we have seen amazing return on investment.
• Compliance oversight - the system allows our national complaince team to review answers and ensure that responses are inalignment.
• Content and brand management - RFPIO allows our marketing and design team to better manage our visual and written brand.
• Faster timeline - we have been able to take a process that used to take months into a much shorter process.

Incentivized