DemandScience vs. DivvyHQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DemandScience
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
DivvyHQ
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
DivvyHQ is a content marketing platform with a central Dashboard and Calendar for managing publication schedules and coordinating workflow (with workflow controls for security), and publishing content. Pricing starts at $25 per month for each user (the Divvy Lite plan with limited features) and rises to $195 per month for each user (Divvy Enterprise with more advanced features, like Custom Workflow, Publishing, API, Calendar Layers, and a dedicated support specialist). DivvyHQ also offers…
$29
per month per user
Pricing
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$1,500 one-time fee per installation
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
7.6
17 Ratings
3% below category average
DivvyHQ
8.0
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Audience profiling and targeting8.317 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics7.614 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard6.910 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
DivvyHQ
9.3
2 Ratings
14% above category average
Approval workflows00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Content collaboration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Content calendar00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
DivvyHQ
9.3
2 Ratings
14% above category average
Content hub00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Embedded CTAs00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Content distribution00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Content automation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Small Businesses
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(75 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(69 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
4.3
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DemandScienceDivvyHQ
Likelihood to Recommend
DemandScience
Demand Science did deliver the quantity of leads without issue. The data for a few was not accurate (bounced when following up). But they agreed to make good by providing substitute leads to meet the quota. Towards the end of my project, they lost a few folks, and so the end of my campaign got a little rough as they were taking over some assignments midway. But we ultimately completed the SOW. I will say that the leads did not perform well in our email cadence - none converted. However, this was a test of the concept for us. Content syndication had a lower cost per qualified lead than some other tactics, so we tested it. Your results may vary, based on your follow-up and your market.
Read full review
DivvyHQ
It's a great visual representation for what's been scheduled for publishing. You're able to see whose project is whose, what the content item will be used for, and any other relevant details if you're curious enough to click on the calendar item. I have not used DivvyHQ for directly publishing content from within, like to social media platforms, websites, or newsletters, directly from Divvy.
Read full review
Pros
DemandScience
  • The initial pitch and contact from Mason used "show me you know me" well, which we felt was a good sign of company culture and approach to database marketing.
  • Delivery of leads was ahead of schedule.
  • They set expectations, and then delivered what they said they would.
  • The leads matched our criteria as agreed.
  • Regular check ins and catch ups, and patience when thing were taking a bit of time to get sorted here.
Read full review
DivvyHQ
  • High quality presentations
  • Low costs
Read full review
Cons
DemandScience
  • We would like to see more proactive communication on what's working and what's not without requiring a meeting - regular reporting cadence to assess asset quality
  • A dashboard view might be nice as well, again, so we can look at an asset and see how it's performing (or if it isn't) without having to wait on a rep to pull a report or schedule a walkthrough
Read full review
DivvyHQ
  • campaigns interface is a bit outdated
  • I'd like to see the dashboard/homepage spruced up
  • open on calendars rather than recent activity
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
DemandScience
Our executives decided to not renew because we were not seeing the ROI they were looking for. However, our executives did not make the best decisions on the data Demand Science provided.
Read full review
DivvyHQ
No answers on this topic
Usability
DemandScience
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Read full review
DivvyHQ
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
DemandScience
Our rep is always available and quickly responds to any question we have. I haven't worked with other partners who are as proactive and excited to help us as our DemandScience rep is. He reaches out with new ideas and suggestions frequently. They are happy to make any changes needed to the campaigns and make those changes quickly and efficiently. They work well with our execution agency, but are also happy to meet with us directly to provide insights and support.
Read full review
DivvyHQ
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
DemandScience
They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
Read full review
DivvyHQ
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
DemandScience
I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific product or software and how this could be beneficial, but I'd steer away from it for services.
Read full review
DivvyHQ
The corporate communication team uses DivvyHQ, TweetDeck and Agorapulse. Each one is used for different purposes and helps us meets our objectives. DivvyHQ helps Unum and Colonial Life's corporate communications teams stay in touch with one another's work and aware of what the other is doing. It allows for content collaboration and keeps us on track to meet individual deadlines.
Read full review
Return on Investment
DemandScience
  • We have been able to grow our lead numbers with high quality leads at a reasonable cost
  • We have been able to generate just the leads we want to support our Business Development team
  • We have been able to get our content in front of our specific TAL
Read full review
DivvyHQ
  • This has saved man power by automating certain functions
  • We have created a new stream of marketing.
Read full review
ScreenShots

DivvyHQ Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Content Operations DashboardScreenshot of The most robust content calendar on the marketScreenshot of Content Interface (List View)Screenshot of Sandbox (Content item detail view)Screenshot of Sandbox > Content (HTML) Editor