Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Diligent One Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Diligent One Platform offers a unified solution for Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) management, providing a comprehensive overview of risks and insights in one place.N/A
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console.N/A
Quality Compliance Systems
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Quality Compliance Systems provides Care Quality Commission (CQC) compliance management software for dentists, doctors, and adult social care providers. It is a SaaS application. It includes over 2,000 pages of policies and procedures written by subject matter experts; as well as protocols, care plans and supporting documentation. Printed manuals are also available.N/A
Pricing
Diligent One PlatformForcepoint Data Loss PreventionQuality Compliance Systems
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Diligent One PlatformForcepoint DLPQuality Compliance Systems
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Diligent One PlatformForcepoint Data Loss PreventionQuality Compliance Systems
Considered Multiple Products
Diligent One Platform
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent One Platform is more robust but less user friendly in my opinion.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Alteryx Intelligence Suite, Arbutus Audit Analytics and Python IDLE
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent One Platform delivers a far superior product for the cost/expense
Chose Diligent One Platform
Aura is a dedicated software to document audits, diligent is so much bigger and integral than that
Chose Diligent One Platform
Advantech Industrial Ethernet Switches
Chose Diligent One Platform
My experience in this regard has been limited unfortunately. Before Diligent our work was Excel based and in my previous company this type of activity was done through an in-house system which was custom built to suit the business.
While Excel offer flexibility I would sum up …
Chose Diligent One Platform
We originally considered SharePoint and made the mistake of choosing Diligent One Platform. We thrilled to be going back to SharePoint; in our experience, Diligent One Platform was a complete waste of time and money.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent One Platform is the best to me so far and it really does well to make use of technology and gadgets to have a paperless environment that can be easily updated and keeps track of changes and archives old documents well. Also has a level of safety from cyber attacks. It …
Chose Diligent One Platform
Risk management is better in D1. Teammate was inflexible.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Even do I personally did not have previous experience with other solutions, the approach that Diligent One Platform has to show the real risks in the organization, how easy is to manage this information that is complex by definition and the support that gives us to 'create a …
Chose Diligent One Platform
Provides a superior product due to the ability to use ACL Analytics and the robots/Results sections.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Wolters Kluwer TeamMate and Arbutus Audit Analytics
Chose Diligent One Platform
Wolters Kluwer TeamMate
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent One Platform
Chose Diligent One Platform
The tool is extremely rigid in its definitions. We tried to implement it for almost a year and nothing happen. One time a team member made a mistake and uploaded a wrong list risks to it was not possible to eliminate any of them we had to take the database down, erase …
Chose Diligent One Platform
Cheaper. We retain diligent due to the cost. The other products have more advanced tools but unfortunately due to overall cost and time to implement we are limited in exploring other options at this time.
Forcepoint DLP
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Nobody can compete with Forcepoint DLP.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
I think Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pales in comparison to the feature set you get with M365 (which is likely included in most corporations existing licensing!). We moved on from Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention to implement Microsoft's solution instead.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We tested and evaluated Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and this solution suited the best for our requirement. We optimized it to suit our requirement of 250 to 300 users in our head office. We will be adding a few more users under this solution which are having Windows and MAC …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
I find Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention to be a superior product compared to the other two alternatives mentioned. It is improving, though, at a slower pace but I have seen it upgrading to its best level. There is more value associated with this tool than the other two. …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Because it allows the creation of reports and statistics, risk assessment, real-time monitoring, fingerprints, machine learning, [and] a dictionary function--so good and useful.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
I have evaluated CoSoSys but the reporting part did not hit the mark. Also, a high number of false positives was a concern for me. I need a predefined report which needs to be compatible with my compliance requirement, which was missing in CoSoSys. However CoSoSys is good for …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We have not done a ton of testing with alternatives at this point.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Netskope, Digital Guardian. We've stuck with Forcepoint to limit the number of major architectural changes in a given year. If we achieved diminishing marginal returns on its ROI, then we'd change because the prevention is good, but the headache has to be less than the …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We have tried out Office 365 and Trend Micro DLP but those solutions have not worked out as we hoped. That said, when we looked at Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, there were only minor issues we came across that did not have any negative impact and overall, the solution was …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but Proofpoint has proven to be a superior product. In our experience Proofpoint has fewer false positives and more out-of-the-box pattern detections requiring less customization. However, there is still a value in having more than one DLP …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Haven't used other product.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We didn't evaluate any other solutions at the time of purchase. Forcepoint was the leader on the Gartner report and we went with their recommendation.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We selected Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention because it meets the size of our organization's needs and the ease of implementation compared to other solutions.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We selected Forcepoint DLP as we already were using their Web and Email filtering products. The integration among their products is very strong and we did not want to introduce too many additional products into our environment. We have limited security resources so a high level …
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Easier to user and cheaper
Chose Forcepoint DLP
We are currently in the evaluation phase to compare overall cost and functionality. Blue Coat runs in a very similar way that Forcepoint does. Check Point runs at the same gateway layer that the firewall does so its policy can be run on the same hardware of existing environments.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint stacks up pretty well against its competitors. It has more functionality then Cisco and is comparable to McAfee. McAfee is one of the few I would feel at ease with replacing our currently solution with.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Overall it was the best we had, SSL decryption worked better than Bluecoat and Cisco traffic had a lot of certificate issues. Websense was the quickest to get up and running and their sales engineering team is superb.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Websense has similar features to other DLP solutions. We selected Websense based upon other organizations' experiences. I cannot compare the negatives to Websense as we did not deploy any other vendor DLP solutions in the same scale.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Websense, at the time, was the only content filtering solution to offer a hybrid option of on-prem and cloud services. We are up for renewal soon and will likely compare them to other vendors.
Chose Forcepoint DLP
Websense gave us the best flexibility for our enterprise configuration and setup. It all does not take up anything on our computers when we use Websense one armed off our firewalls and routers. We found this very easy to set up and transparent to our users and network. The …
Quality Compliance Systems

No answer on this topic

Features
Diligent One PlatformForcepoint Data Loss PreventionQuality Compliance Systems
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Diligent One Platform
6.0
Ratings
22% below category average
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
-
Ratings
Quality Compliance Systems
-
Ratings
Common repository of GRC items7.10 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems5.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
GRC policy management5.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident management5.80 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Diligent One Platform
-
Ratings
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
5.8
Ratings
31% below category average
Quality Compliance Systems
-
Ratings
Data Encryption00 Ratings5.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Diligent One PlatformForcepoint Data Loss PreventionQuality Compliance Systems
Small Businesses
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Paubox Email Suite
Paubox Email Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Diligent One PlatformForcepoint Data Loss PreventionQuality Compliance Systems
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.8
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
5.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Diligent One PlatformForcepoint Data Loss PreventionQuality Compliance Systems
Likelihood to Recommend
Diligent Community is well suited for entities in the public sector who need to comply with the Brown Act. Diligent One Platform is not well suitable for those who are not tech savvy. Board members who are older and do not use the Diligent One Platform frequently, are not comfortable using some of the functionality - such as voting - so it still needs to be done on the back-end.
Read full review
-Where companies need to secure their attachment, which goes outside, means from their company to outside -Where companies need to ensure their client's personal information -Where companies need DLP. They need to look for Forcepoint only, as they have the upper hand over the rest of their competitors.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Enhance business compliance by maintaining records and documents for all our processes and reports, which allows us to not worry about training new people in case resources are transferred.
  • We integrated risk assessment tools and business continuity plans, which allowed proactive identification and mitigation of potential business risks.
  • It helped to secure communication channels with confidential discussions and document sharing among team members and leadership.
Read full review
  • The Forcepoint Endpoint Data Loss Prevention Endpoint module is applied to secure data being used at endpoints, like from Microsoft Excel and other Microsoft capabilities, also other functions like email and FTP, Active Sync, etc. It secures the data in use at the endpoint.
  • The Forcepoint Endpoint Data Loss Prevention Network Module is applied for the traffic being used in network capabilities like email, FTP, and web. It also secures the data on the move in the network.
  • Forcepoint Data Discover--the capability to discover the data which is sensitive for the organization and lies across the network; with the discovery tool, we can define the data, which is important based on regulatory and compliance risk.
  • OCR (optical character recognition) capabilities also come with the Data Discover Module, by which we can see the embedded text inside the image and that helps to prevent sensitive data theft.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • When multiple people have the same permissions in workflow, it can be confusing on who is the approver
  • When a workflow is rejected by a second reviewer, it will automatically go back to the preparer - the item does not go back to the first reviewer
Read full review
  • Remote filtering is not as advanced as we would like.
  • Support time is not as quick as needed in most cases.
  • Upgrades of appliances and software is not as easy as other solutions.
  • HTTPS inspection needs to hand a valid cert and doesnt work correctly with all vendors.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We have been fairly happy with the product and how it has worked. We have looked at other vendors for url filter and such and have not found one that meets our needs or does what we have been doing with Websense. The product has been fairly stable and we have only had a few issues in the past. We have all seen that it was one of the highest leaders from the Gartner Group Magic Quadrant for Web Gateways.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The new platform seems to be much easier to use. The other had a lot of wasted space and it seems that has all been fixed. I like all of the new features and being so used to boarddocs, I was not sure about learning something new but I see that it will make my life easier.
Read full review
For us, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention was difficult to administer, did not work well when it did work, was incredibly expensive for the feature set you get, and was difficult to uninstall when we moved on from the software. Once it was fully set up, it worked occasionally for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
HighBond by Galvanize support has some of the best and fastest support that I have experienced. Though we only contact them through emails, they were quick to provide insightful information about our problems. Whenever we email them about an issue, they would be able to reply in less than an hour, ready and prepared with useful solutions to address the issue.
Read full review
Support from Forcepoint has been lacking. When calling in with a high priority issue we rarely are able to work with a technician immediately. The queue waits are very long and when you get through there are no support engineers available and we need to wait for a call back for hours it seems.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
We’re pretty satisfied with the implementation offering and the reading experiences provided. With our quarterly audits, this tool has made the task much more accessible. The outcome of version control of documents is easy to accomplish, and gathering all the records in one place makes it more accessible.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
My experience in this regard has been limited unfortunately. Before Diligent our work was Excel based and in my previous company this type of activity was done through an in-house system which was custom built to suit the business. While Excel offer flexibility I would sum up our previous challenges with using an Excel based platform as follows: 1-Version control was a disaster to manage in a big company. There was not always a single version of the truth and broken formulas can derail the process and set us back significantly 2-Excel lacks the clear audit trails we wanted, specifically if we consider the key compliance areas of the business 3-Reporting to Exco took too long, relied on key individual skills in data analytics and reporting
Read full review
User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and start utilizing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention solution.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Main benefit has been the integration of compliance from different countries into one management tool
  • We have been able to to double our coverage with the same amount of people
  • we have been able to integrate all certification, legal compliance, Operational compliance and Risk auditing into one coherent strategy
Read full review
  • The capability of this tool to update in real time has saved a lot of time and even saved a lot of energy for researching.
  • The exchange of financial information related to customers builds up an extreme risk of data loss, which can be damaging to the customer.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Diligent One Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of