Diligent One Platform vs. Secureframe

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Diligent One Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Diligent One Platform offers a unified solution for Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) management, providing a comprehensive overview of risks and insights in one place.N/A
Secureframe
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Secureframe, headquartered in San Francisco, helps companies get enterprise ready by streamlining SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA compliance. Secureframe aims to enable companies to get compliant within weeks, rather than months and monitors 40+ services, including AWS, GCP, and Azur.N/A
Pricing
Diligent One PlatformSecureframe
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Diligent One PlatformSecureframe
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Diligent One PlatformSecureframe
Considered Both Products
Diligent One Platform
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent One Platform is more robust but less user friendly in my opinion.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Alteryx Intelligence Suite, Arbutus Audit Analytics and Python IDLE
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent One Platform delivers a far superior product for the cost/expense
Chose Diligent One Platform
Aura is a dedicated software to document audits, diligent is so much bigger and integral than that
Chose Diligent One Platform
Advantech Industrial Ethernet Switches
Chose Diligent One Platform
My experience in this regard has been limited unfortunately. Before Diligent our work was Excel based and in my previous company this type of activity was done through an in-house system which was custom built to suit the business.
While Excel offer flexibility I would sum up …
Chose Diligent One Platform
We originally considered SharePoint and made the mistake of choosing Diligent One Platform. We thrilled to be going back to SharePoint; in our experience, Diligent One Platform was a complete waste of time and money.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent One Platform is the best to me so far and it really does well to make use of technology and gadgets to have a paperless environment that can be easily updated and keeps track of changes and archives old documents well. Also has a level of safety from cyber attacks. It …
Chose Diligent One Platform
Risk management is better in D1. Teammate was inflexible.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Even do I personally did not have previous experience with other solutions, the approach that Diligent One Platform has to show the real risks in the organization, how easy is to manage this information that is complex by definition and the support that gives us to 'create a …
Chose Diligent One Platform
Provides a superior product due to the ability to use ACL Analytics and the robots/Results sections.
Chose Diligent One Platform
Wolters Kluwer TeamMate and Arbutus Audit Analytics
Chose Diligent One Platform
Wolters Kluwer TeamMate
Chose Diligent One Platform
Diligent One Platform
Chose Diligent One Platform
The tool is extremely rigid in its definitions. We tried to implement it for almost a year and nothing happen. One time a team member made a mistake and uploaded a wrong list risks to it was not possible to eliminate any of them we had to take the database down, erase …
Chose Diligent One Platform
Cheaper. We retain diligent due to the cost. The other products have more advanced tools but unfortunately due to overall cost and time to implement we are limited in exploring other options at this time.
Secureframe
Chose Secureframe
From purely comparing marketing sites (unable to trial others), Secureframe had better first time SOC 2 audit documentation and explanations for free to ease you into understanding the processes.
Chose Secureframe
Simplicity, ease of use, and responsiveness. The three most important things for me in any product/service. If use of the product comes naturally and I get the answers I need quickly you're already a contender for me. But, when I can get a response from my account manager in …
Features
Diligent One PlatformSecureframe
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Diligent One Platform
6.0
Ratings
22% below category average
Secureframe
-
Ratings
Common repository of GRC items7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
GRC policy management5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident management5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Diligent One PlatformSecureframe
Small Businesses
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 InsightVM
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Diligent One PlatformSecureframe
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Diligent One PlatformSecureframe
Likelihood to Recommend
Diligent Community is well suited for entities in the public sector who need to comply with the Brown Act. Diligent One Platform is not well suitable for those who are not tech savvy. Board members who are older and do not use the Diligent One Platform frequently, are not comfortable using some of the functionality - such as voting - so it still needs to be done on the back-end.
Read full review
Good typical compliance framework with easy interface and integrations to ensure standard compliances like SOC 2. I suspect for the base functionality, its very similar to other competitors like Vanta so really a preference.
Read full review
Pros
  • Enhance business compliance by maintaining records and documents for all our processes and reports, which allows us to not worry about training new people in case resources are transferred.
  • We integrated risk assessment tools and business continuity plans, which allowed proactive identification and mitigation of potential business risks.
  • It helped to secure communication channels with confidential discussions and document sharing among team members and leadership.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • When multiple people have the same permissions in workflow, it can be confusing on who is the approver
  • When a workflow is rejected by a second reviewer, it will automatically go back to the preparer - the item does not go back to the first reviewer
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The new platform seems to be much easier to use. The other had a lot of wasted space and it seems that has all been fixed. I like all of the new features and being so used to boarddocs, I was not sure about learning something new but I see that it will make my life easier.
Read full review
The Questionnaires feature (which assists in RFP's, security questionnaires, etc) could be designed a lot better. I see what they were going for, and based on their track record for improving features I'm sure it will get a refresh, but in it's current state it is the only features that I do not use.
Read full review
Support Rating
HighBond by Galvanize support has some of the best and fastest support that I have experienced. Though we only contact them through emails, they were quick to provide insightful information about our problems. Whenever we email them about an issue, they would be able to reply in less than an hour, ready and prepared with useful solutions to address the issue.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
We’re pretty satisfied with the implementation offering and the reading experiences provided. With our quarterly audits, this tool has made the task much more accessible. The outcome of version control of documents is easy to accomplish, and gathering all the records in one place makes it more accessible.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
My experience in this regard has been limited unfortunately. Before Diligent our work was Excel based and in my previous company this type of activity was done through an in-house system which was custom built to suit the business. While Excel offer flexibility I would sum up our previous challenges with using an Excel based platform as follows: 1-Version control was a disaster to manage in a big company. There was not always a single version of the truth and broken formulas can derail the process and set us back significantly 2-Excel lacks the clear audit trails we wanted, specifically if we consider the key compliance areas of the business 3-Reporting to Exco took too long, relied on key individual skills in data analytics and reporting
Read full review
Simplicity, ease of use, and responsiveness. The three most important things for me in any product/service. If use of the product comes naturally and I get the answers I need quickly you're already a contender for me. But, when I can get a response from my account manager in under 90 minutes, consistently. Then I know that my business matters to them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Main benefit has been the integration of compliance from different countries into one management tool
  • We have been able to to double our coverage with the same amount of people
  • we have been able to integrate all certification, legal compliance, Operational compliance and Risk auditing into one coherent strategy
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Diligent One Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of