Dixa, headquartered in Copenhagen, offers their VoIP and call center software, featuring browser based phone, email, and live chat, intelligent skill-based call routing and other agent management tools, queue management and prioritization, and other features designed to provide scalable customer support for ecommerce and small businesses.
$39
per month per user
Groove by OptimizeCX
Score6.7 out of 10
N/A
Groove by OptimizeCX is a shared inbox for small and mid-sized SaaS teams. It’s presented as a help desk built for speed and not complexity, and is designed to help manage customer conversations across channels.
$87
per quarter per user
Pricing
Dixa
Groove by OptimizeCX
Editions & Modules
Growth
$109
per month per user
Ultimate
$169
per month per user
Prime
$215
per month per user
*Custom
Contact for quote
per month per user
Standard
$29
per month (billed quarterly) per user
Plus
$45
per month (billed quarterly) per user
Pro
$70
per month (billed quarterly) per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Dixa
Groove by OptimizeCX
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discount offered for annual billing.
Many product add-ons available:
- Dixa Chatbot
- Dixa Quality and Insights
- Collaboration Users
- Seasonal Agents
Service add-ons
- Active Guidance: Dixa Platform
- Active Guidance: Chatbot & Automation
- Custom Card Integration
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Dixa
Groove by OptimizeCX
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Dixa and Groove by OptimizeCX
Feature
Dixa
-
Ratings
Groove by OptimizeCX
1.4
6 Ratings
142% below category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets
00 Ratings
1.26 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
1.23 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
2.03 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission
00 Ratings
2.05 Ratings
Ticket response
00 Ratings
1.15 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Dixa and Groove by OptimizeCX
Feature
Dixa
-
Ratings
Groove by OptimizeCX
1.4
5 Ratings
140% below category average
External knowledge base
00 Ratings
1.44 Ratings
Internal knowledge base
00 Ratings
1.44 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Dixa and Groove by OptimizeCX
Dixa may be a more cost-effective cash flow program than other programs used in our organization. Dixa does not require us to change our phone number when using the application because it is adaptable to our current number; the Dixa team handles the interface by quickly adding our phone number to their system. Despite the significant additions and updates to Dixa, our company is very pleased with the results obtained so far.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Groove is great for people who are wanting to provide accountability and organization for teams across your business. It is suited well for an organization that has many email requests coming in every day, because you can assign tickets to specific team members. It would not be suited for an organization that utilizes more phone support, than email support
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Creates Tickets when someone emails in or you can create a ticket within the groove system.
They have great reports on response times and the average amount of time it took for a ticket to close. You can even see individuals average response times as well as specific teams.
We use their Knowledge Base which is a great tool for creating FAQ and sending people to that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I'm giving them a 3 for the really great support they gave for general questions. They also have a good knowledge base. I'm giving them only a 3 though because of my last customer service when I need a billing resolution. I was very disappointed in how they handled that. I also find it very bad practice to send out ONE email notice that they were raising my rate three times as much at the end of the month. When I was with Desk.com, I had numerous emails over months letting me know their billing plans were changing. Even worse than refusing to refund me the difference was that they just stopped responding to me.
Value proposition was by far and away the best. Any other system that had the features was much more expensive. The ease of programming made start up cost almost non existent. You have the ability to modify programming easily and do any special projects that invariable need to be accomplished by customer care.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We also use Trello for project management. I have used both systems and we like Groove because it allows for our clients to contact us via email. They do not have to go to a ticket submission page, they can just email us directly and it will create a ticket. Groove also provides analytics on how long it takes to respond to tickets
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info