DrChrono in Sunnyvale offers what they describe as a complete EHR, Practice Management, and Revenue Cycle Management Solution - Available on iPad, iPhone, and Web. DrChrono offers solutions for speciality practices as well.
$199
per month
Qualifacts Insync
Score1.5 out of 10
N/A
Qualifacts InSync offers a cloud-based healthcare IT solutions configured specifically to the user's practice and workflows. EHR, practice management, medical billing, telemedicine, e-prescribing and patient portal for practices of all sizes.
Templates are customizable and you can take pictures directly into a patient's chart. DrChrono is less appropriate for this reason: they have been working on enrolling my company for Medicare electronic billing for [seven months]. [As a result], I have been unable to bill for any Medicare patients for [seven months]. The only person I have talked to was in India [and] ([the] email address ended in .india). I have had to call Medicare to try to figure out how to complete the enrollment process, [and I ended up with this response from Medicare: "DrChrono needs to [stop being lazy and do something]!." I lost [a] significant [amount of] money. [...]
This software is a giant piece of flaming garbage. I would never recommend this to my worst enemy. I cannot tell you how frustrating it is that I have gone more than four months to try to get benefit eligibility to consistently work. I have submitted over 40 different attachments of images and videos showing what we are seeing. I have had to have tickets open with Inovalon and Qualifacts on the issue, escalating the issue to top tech support people, escalating it to our account manager, and escalating it with billing. Still, after numerous tickets, complaints, and tech support phone calls, we still haven't gotten a resolution.On top of that, Qualifacts has no problem billing us for this feature that isn't even working properly or responding to any emails regarding the excess use charges for a service that has been tested for the past four-plus months by tech support, and then charging us for that extra use.
[Onboarding] trainers and tech support do not know the program.
[All] DrChrono calls are from blocked, [unknown], or their personal numbers. [Looking] at [each] caller ID, you have to answer every call because they do not register as DrChrono.
DrChrono [uses] [Google] phone and [I could] not understand what [a] trainer [said] [when I called them]. [I could not hear what the trainer said] over the noise of other conversations on [Google] phone.
[I] [had] absolutely no way of talking to tech support in person.
[Tech] support tickets [are] unanswered.
[They] do not know how to enroll providers to bill Medicare electronically.
[There was] absolutely no accountability.
[The] platform was constantly down [and was very frustrating].
[There was a] consistently, delayed submission.
[Every] day, [I got] an email about a problem that they are working on.
[Weekly] issues for platform [was] addressed for slowness.
Tech support needs [to have professional people answering tech problems, needs to be reliable, and be responsive whenever someone has issues].
[The] tutorial videos [for DrChrono] are from several years [ago] and no longer apply to the [most] current platform layout.
[The] help browser [is] nonfunctional.
[Tech support is not well trained. You can not talk to anyone in person and they often do not answer tech tickets. Onboard trainers do not know their system. Customer often figures out the answers before the training rep. Between the accent and the noise of Google phone, my entire training session was asking her to repeat what she said. When they are rated lowest of the group for tech support, it is for a reason].
We would love to be able to send reports via secure email (the functionality s there, but the other party needs the same software, and that is rare in our area
We would love to have electronic visit verification integrated into the software - right now we need to use a 3rd party software package
Can be overly complicated at times. They emphasize that it's nearly fully customizable without addressing the implications of customizing everything and the fact that it's virtually impossible for them to test the functionality of all of these customizations from practice to practice. We were promised many things during our build out phase and pre-launch, only to find out after we went live that a lot of these features didn't actually function the way that they indicated they would, had ongoing issues, had intermittent functionality without any resolution, or just simply did not work
I am glad I am not always affected by the platform problems. You get daily emails notifying you they are working on slowness, ERA submission problems etc
Every call is capped at 15 to 30 minutes, and if the issue isn't fixed in that window, the fix is to reschedule another 15-to-30-minute call rather than escalate or extend the session. That loop can, and does, repeat indefinitely. We've had our core eligibility issue open since March 16, 2026 with a second formal case open since April 9, 2026 specifically for the batch eligibility failures, and neither has produced a resolution in over four months. We have submitted more than 40 attachments to tech support on this single issue and sat through repeated calls with both InSync support and Inovalon directly. Support has stayed engaged in the sense of taking more calls and opening more tickets, but not in the sense of ever fixing anything or committing to a resolution date. When we escalated in writing, requesting a credit and a named owner for the fix, and looped in both our account manager and finance in the first week of July, we got no response at all, written or otherwise. The pattern across every support interaction is the same: acknowledge the ticket, burn a short call, reschedule, repeat, with no accountability if the deadline slips because there's never a real deadline set in the first place. For a platform handling billing, eligibility, and clinical documentation, that level of support is not adequate for the stakes involved.
When being trained on the billing program, rather than start at the beginning and "TRAIN HOW TO USE THE PROGRAM" the trainer kept asking me what questions I had. I kept saying I don't know what I don't know. Her response was, ok, were done then. You don't have anymore questions. The only thing I could think to do was ask her to explain each item in each drop down box, but she would just read out loud the drop down choices and ask what questions I had. This pretty much sums up their training.
TheraOffice has the best tech support and onboarding training. WebPT is also good, but their charting templates lack customization. RehabOptima and Casamba are straight forward and reliable. I am currently stuck with DrChrono.
NO MORE "CIRCLE OF DEATH"!!!!!!!!!!!!! No need to find "workarounds" for everyday tasks. No more need to scan and upload paper documents! Billing is much clearer. Claims and statements are easy to monitor. [Insync Healthcare Solutions] has listened [to] its clients and built a system that caters to all!!!!!!! No regrets with our decision to go with [Insync Healthcare Solutions]!!!!
Negative: I have lost reimbursement due to the time for tech support to address ticket and the max claims submission time.
Negative: I have [not had any medicare revenue for seven months] due to DrChrono not knowing how to enroll for Medicare Electronic Billing. This issue still has not been resolved.
Negative: Lost time due to the platform being down or running slow.
We love the ease of use, it really creates a smooth process between departments.
We have had some issues with the billing, but it is partially staffing and partially training- we are still working with our staff and our representative from Insync to fix these errors, so it is difficult to put the blame on Insync [Healthcare Solutions]. I believe some of it is user error.
The conflicting information we receive from Insync support has created a lot of issues in the billing department. I would like more consistency from their support team, as I have witnessed two people ask the same question, and get a completely different answer. Again, this could be a user error contributing to the confusion, but consistent responses would be helpful to solve the issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
