Elate vs. IBM Targetprocess

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Elate
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Elate is a strategic planning and execution software built to help companies to communicate a vision, create alignment, and track strategic performance. Elate helps departments and individuals understand how their work rolls up to the long-term strategy by showing where a company is going and how it is getting there. Users can review objectives & OKRs, automate executive reporting, and manage a company's vision for growth.N/A
IBM Targetprocess
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Targetprocess is a Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) SaaS that connects strategy, funding, and execution. It helps enterprises prioritize work, dynamically allocate resources, and continuously adapt plans. With real-time visibility and financial insights, organizations can deliver faster, clearer business outcomes.N/A
Pricing
ElateIBM Targetprocess
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ElateIBM Targetprocess
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ElateIBM Targetprocess
Considered Both Products
Elate

No answer on this topic

IBM Targetprocess
Chose IBM Targetprocess
ServiceNow CPQ and SAP LeanIX Enterprise Architecture
Chose IBM Targetprocess
More value for less money, and easier to set up.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Selected IBM Targetprocess because of it's integration with Apptio. We still are using workboard as IBM Targetprocess doesn't allow a Many to many OKR connection
Chose IBM Targetprocess
ServiceNow Now Platform, Broadcom Clarity and Jira Align
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Not using any other products that compare with Targetprocess. The reason we use Targetprocess is because its ability to integrate with other tool and specifically other IBM tools which provides organizations who already have made investments with other IBM tools like …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
IBM Targetprocess is more customizable and can adapt to the organization's needs than Jira Algin
Chose IBM Targetprocess
On par with these tools but with room for improvement
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Lower cost
Easier implementation
Less restrictive in terms of customisation
Chose IBM Targetprocess
We chose IBM Targetprocess because, in our opinion, IBM Targetprocess has Richer capabilities
Chose IBM Targetprocess
During our RFP and demo rating Apptio Targetprocess came out with the highest score by 3% and was the more cost effective of the closer rival. It rated the highest in 4 out of the 8 categories we graded and had one of the most cost effective implementation costs and ranked the …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Apptio Targetprocess outshone the competition on several benchmarks. The most important for our team was ease of administration, ease of configuration, cost of licenses, and ability to leverage the tool in multiple areas (not just project management or engineering). Apptio …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Apptio Targetprocess has more features and is more flexible for our users and its easier to develop automation rules and metrics than Atlassian Jira Alige or Planview AgilePlan.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
It’s better because of its flexibility and ability to support agile at scale as well as portfolio management in one tool.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
I wasn't a decisionmaker on the adoption of Apptio Targetprocess over the competitors so I can't clearly speak to this question.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Others weren't compared
Features
ElateIBM Targetprocess
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Elate
-
Ratings
IBM Targetprocess
6.9
Ratings
8% below category average
Task Management00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Search00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Elate
-
Ratings
IBM Targetprocess
6.8
Ratings
13% below category average
DevOps Tool Integrations00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Code Review00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Code Collaboration00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Velocity Calculation00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ElateIBM Targetprocess
Small Businesses
Coda
Coda
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Targetprocess
IBM Targetprocess
Score 8.4 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Targetprocess
IBM Targetprocess
Score 8.4 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ElateIBM Targetprocess
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ElateIBM Targetprocess
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Apptio Targetprocess is well suited to track work and progress of that work. In addition it is easy to tie that work to OKRs. Cost and hours rollup across the work hierarchy works well. Our users like the flexibility of Targetprocess and the ability to develop their own views and reports Scenarios where it is less appropriate is to do executive level reporting and develop reports that can pull in all of our time data since there is a 300k record limit
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Basic flexibility out of the box is a big advantage for a small company without resources to customize, as is needed for some of the larger competitors.
  • The support is second to none. They've even written custom TP queries to get me what I want.
  • They have managed to cover all the basics of product development in one product, in particular, the inclusion of customer support (although limited) is a big selling point for a small company.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • The UI is bit complex for new users who never used it. i think this can be sorted out by providing the steps to access?
  • dashboards with large datasets can cause performance lags or timeouts
  • Introduce more flexible, template-based RBAC configurations.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Targetprocess is the most flexible application for tracking work among teams that we have found. This power comes from near limitless ability to customize your views on the work tracked in the system, and from the myriad reporting options to draw metrics and stats out of the data there. Custom fields, processes, and mashups all add to this flexibility and appeal.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Overall Targetprocess's usability is good. the tool is easy to use and has features which most BUs and organizations can use. Additional features like AI integration would help the tool and its overall usability. providing additional dashboards for specific roles and executives within the tool would benefit Targetprocess with its scale
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Some minor outages are experienced, though these tend to pass within an hour usually and work can continue
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Reports are fast loading, considering they can refresh in a second or less and we have 7 years of work tracked in over 40k entities. Pages can load slowly when the views are very busy, but not frustratingly. I am a console user most of my career and generally prefer it over webUI interfaces, but Targetprocess won me over from the beginning and I spend half my day using it now.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
TargetProcess' support is one of its strengths. The support team is very responsive and helpful when there is a problem but they're also proactive in providing good release notes and engaging with the community through a voting scheme to influence the priority of new features.
The team also releases new versions frequently with new features but with no knock-ons to currently working features.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
You should take some time to get everyone to agree how the system should be setup before work starts being tracked in Targetprocess, this avoids difficult and disruptive changes to processes or plugins later when everyone relies on it daily.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Targetprocess was all around the better tool. They do not nickel-and-dime you and you don't have to deal with multiple products that do, or do not, integrate well together. Below are some of Targetprocess' biggest strengths:
  • Highly customizable; can fit the needs of almost any team
  • Robust reporting tool
  • Easy to use and administer
  • Provides all the functionality an agile org would be looking for
  • Support team and user guide are phenomenal.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We use the hosted version of Targetprocess and have never run into limitations or degraded performance due to scalability. Excellent performance over 7 years!
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • TargetProcess is my all-time favorite project management software that enables me to work collaboratively and also enthusiastically with my colleagues.
  • Before its invention, emails were difficult to handle in the past but now to make connections better I only trust this application because it’s a good intuitive to work in the form of group.
  • It provides me a quite useful view that facilitates my working in a way that I can create a customized view of all my ongoing projects.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Targetprocess Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource Management: Reduces risk by dynamically managing resources, capacity, and demandScreenshot of Program Management: To deliver value throughout a strategic portfolioScreenshot of Portfolio Budgeting: Shifting from project to product fundingScreenshot of Strategic Planning: Continuously links work, labor, and investments to business strategyScreenshot of Workforce ManagementScreenshot of Work