eMaint offers computerized maintenance management software with features for inventory management, asset management, maintenance scheduling, etc. eMaint is now owned and supported by Fluke Corp since the September 2016 acquisition.
$69
per month per user
IFS Applications
Score7.6 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
OMS Office Master System
Score9.2 out of 10
N/A
OMS Office Master System is an inventory management software offering from Master System. It includes features such as oms enterprise software and inventory control.
N/A
Pricing
eMaint CMMS
IFS Applications
OMS Office Master System
Editions & Modules
Team
$69
per month per user
Professional
$85
per month per user
Enterprise
$120
per month per user
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
eMaint CMMS
IFS Applications
OMS Office Master System
Free Trial
Yes
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
eMaint CMMS
IFS Applications
OMS Office Master System
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.8
3 Ratings
44% below category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
6.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
OMS Office Master System
10.0
1 Ratings
29% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Serial number and batch tracking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Barcode scanning
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Automation rules
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Reporting and analytics
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Fulfillment
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Backorder management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Returns management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Bill of materials management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Item kitting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Invoicing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Accounting integration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Point of sale integration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Pricing
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Billing Management
00 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.3
2 Ratings
23% above category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
9.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
9.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
8.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
8.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
11% above category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
9.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
Feature
eMaint CMMS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
OMS Office Master System
-
Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of eMaint CMMS and IFS Applications and OMS Office Master System
eMaint is well suited to larger facilities with dedicated scheduler/planners. Learning to navigate the database and create reports requires a dedicated resource. Part-time users often forget the process for entering data and navigating the database. In smaller organizations where multiple users enter assets, planned maintenance (PM) tasks and vendors, keeping standardization in the system formatting was difficult.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
OMS is created for wholesale businesses and is used by many of the companies in our industry. It is apparent that their features have been carefully developed over time to address the business needs for B2B companies. Our company has thousands of SKUs and a unique pricing structure, and OMS was able to handle our unique needs. We would have liked the software to be more modern and to have a better user flow. Importing and exporting data requires a person with experience to handle.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
OMS software been around for a long time and they have thoughtfully added features for wholesale businesses. However, the software is in need of an update that makes the software easier to use and more modern.
The user flow could be improved and the layout could be more intuitive. It is inconvenient to change between modules. It takes time for team members to become familiar with the software.
We appreciate the ability to import/export data, however we wish that this feature was easier to use for the team. Currently only a few members with technology experience are able to use the feature.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
We highly recommend OMS because of their customer support. When evaluating their software, we had a sales associate and a programmer walk us through the software and answer questions. They allowed us to demo the software at our offices. During onboarding, we received live training form a knowledgeable team member. We were happy that phone calls were always answered quickly. In fact, they reached out to us multiple times to make sure that we were set up and happy.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
eMaint was by far most the most comprehensive and customizable solution we looked at. The eMaint team was also extremely responsive and available during the selection process. The product training and conferences were very helpful for new user orientation and best practice learning. The customizable reports also allowed us to provide data to management in an easy to digest format
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info