TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

EMAsphere vs. IBM Cognos Analytics vs. Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    EMAsphere

    N/AN/AN/AN/A

    IBM Cognos Analytics

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cognos is a full-featured business intelligence suite by IBM, designed for larger deployments. It comprises Query Studio, Reporting Studio, Analysis Studio and Event Studio, and Cognos Administration along with tools for Microsoft Office integration, full-text search, and dashboards.

    $11.25

    per month per user

    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ATagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
    Pricing
    EMAsphereIBM Cognos AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    On Demand - Standard
    USD 11.25
    per month per user
    On Demand - Premium
    USD 44.90
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    EMAsphereIBM Cognos AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Free Trial
    YesYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    EMAsphereIBM Cognos AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Considered Multiple Products
    EMAsphere
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    We have been using CCH Tagetik for uploading Financial data from our other ERP system such as ACCPAC, Navision, Talent etc.. My experience with SAP was using them as ERP system. Thus can't really do a lot of comparison between the two system. The main reason why CCH Tagetik was …
    Incentivized
    Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Better workflow capabilities Strongest solution for consolidation Easy to maintain and finance owned
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Would buy again
    92 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    79 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    18 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    91 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    18 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    55 Answers
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    64 Answers
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    Features
    EMAsphereIBM Cognos AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.7
    138 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.1
    10 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings7.6129 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.0136 Ratings8.58 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.5131 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.9
    138 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    7.4
    24 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings7.4136 Ratings6.623 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.3139 Ratings7.123 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.397 Ratings7.17 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.6133 Ratings8.716 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    9.2
    136 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.4
    15 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings9.836 Ratings9.910 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.2132 Ratings9.913 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings9.833 Ratings7.712 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.2134 Ratings9.911 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings9.918 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.4
    124 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.5
    8 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings7.9121 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.0114 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings6.7110 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings6.947 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.8
    130 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.8
    23 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings7.5129 Ratings9.923 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings7.5127 Ratings9.922 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings7.4127 Ratings9.923 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.257 Ratings9.94 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.6111 Ratings9.216 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    6.3
    109 Ratings
    21% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    6.1
    9 Ratings
    19% below category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.8104 Ratings5.08 Ratings
    Mobile Application00 Ratings6.390 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings6.696 Ratings7.16 Ratings
    Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
    Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    9.2
    87 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    REST API00 Ratings7.683 Ratings00 Ratings
    Javascript API00 Ratings7.779 Ratings00 Ratings
    iFrames00 Ratings9.912 Ratings00 Ratings
    Java API00 Ratings10.013 Ratings00 Ratings
    Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings9.915 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings9.99 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.4
    49 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Long-term financial planning00 Ratings00 Ratings8.235 Ratings
    Financial budgeting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.143 Ratings
    Forecasting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.240 Ratings
    Scenario modeling00 Ratings00 Ratings8.634 Ratings
    Management reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.046 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.8
    46 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Financial data consolidation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.940 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports00 Ratings00 Ratings8.337 Ratings
    Multi-currency management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.334 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings00 Ratings9.337 Ratings
    Minority Ownership00 Ratings00 Ratings8.630 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.944 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings00 Ratings8.236 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.0
    50 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.042 Ratings
    Management Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.947 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.150 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.035 Ratings
    XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings00 Ratings9.920 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.2
    31 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Personalized dashboards00 Ratings00 Ratings8.426 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    KPIs00 Ratings00 Ratings8.624 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings8.322 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of EMAsphere and IBM Cognos Analytics and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    EMAsphere
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.2
    47 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Flat file integration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.339 Ratings
    Excel data integration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.145 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings00 Ratings9.131 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    EMAsphereIBM Cognos AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Jaspersoft Community Edition
    Score7 out of 10
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score7.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    EMAsphereIBM Cognos AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (158 ratings)
    9.0
    (50 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (31 ratings)
    9.1
    (11 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (10 ratings)
    8.7
    (18 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (9 ratings)
    9.1
    (6 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    5.5
    (3 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (40 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sources
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.3
    (40 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (5 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    EMAsphereIBM Cognos AnalyticsWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    For Transaction monitoring, we build reports for executive management, providing insights into the number of alerts, the types or categories of detection scenarios, the risk profile, and a snapshot of high- or urgent-priority cases to be reported to AUSTRAC. Congos helps to build the report by ingesting alert data exported from SAS datasets. It joins with other data from Teradata and Customer Hub (Oracle).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Scenarios where CCH Tagetik is suitable is when a company have large amounts of data and want to transform, consolidate, store and produce reporting in different year, period etc with complex calculations and allocation. Tagetik is the tool for you in this case and it's very flexible in terms of creating your own business rule, calculation and reporting options with a user friendly interface. I have not thought about scenarios where it is not appropriate to use tagetik yet as the tool covers small and large business financial needs
    Read full review
    Pros
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • Enterprise reporting - Create, customise, and run reports on sales trends, consumer sentiment, etc.
    • Dashboard creation and data exploration & analysis - Using drag and drop feature to create ad-hoc visualisation. Additionally, using AI powered natural language query feature for data analysis and dashboard input (formation of pie, bar, line charts). It's useful for no-technical person to put queries around the spreadsheet data to get quick answers.
    • Building insights for accurate decision making - Package reports with data backed insights for stakeholders in pdf, and Excel format to support business ad-hoc cases, forecasting and strategic recommendations on relevant asks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
    • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
    • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
    • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
    • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • IBM Cognos Analytics enables customer data segmentation, which is essential for marketing, improving and streamlining purchasing behavior and preferences. This helps companies create more targeted and effective marketing campaigns.
    • Our clients Through data analysis, we can identify and observe trends in the behavior of other clients, allowing us to anticipate needs and adjust strategies to avoid consequences.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Online help and manual is a bonus but could be improved e.g. the clarity of English explanations.
    • Improved Excel compatibility e.g. formula driven reporting and dash boarding.
    • Mobile phone connectivity e.g. launching a consolidation from a Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik app.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    For an existing solution, renewing licenses does provide a good return on investment. Additionally, while rolling out scorecards and dashboards with little adhoc capabilities, to end users, cognos is very easily scalable. It also allows to create a solution that has a mix of OLAP and relational data-sources, which is a limitation with other tools. Synchronizing with existing security setup is easy too.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Because in my oppinion Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is one of the most usable tools for consolidation, planning (controlling) and reporting. Its usability is quite easy and innovative. I like the data entry method for the customers with its workflow and tasks, quite easy way to implement a co pilot. And i like the reporting tool, with a lot of customization opportunities.
    Read full review
    Usability
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    We have a strong user base (3500 users) that are highly utilizing this tool. Basic users are able to consume content within the applied security model. We have a set of advanced users that really push the limits of Cognos with Report and Query Studio. These users have created a lot of personal content and stored it in 'My Reports'. Users enjoy this flexibility.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Surprisingly, this platform is a powerhouse ERP system. However, given time, when more and more organization is able to identify how powerful this tool can be, CCH Tagetik is able to stand as a competitive advantage to many of the Financial industry of today. Although, it needs time to understand the logic behind how CCH Tagetik is formed and setup, once it is known to the user, it is an easy day to day operations with minimal maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Reports can typically be viewed through any browser that can access the server, so the availability is ultimately up to what the company utilizing it is comfortable with allowing, though report development tends to be more picky about browsers and settings as mentioned above. It also has an optional iPad app and general mobile browsing support, but dashboards lack the mobile compatibility. What keeps it from getting a higher score is the desktop tools that are vital to the development process. The compatibility with only Windows when the server has a wide range of compatibility can be a real sore point for a company that outfits its employees exclusively with Mac or Linux machines. Of course, if they are planning on outsourcing the development anyways, it's a rather moot point
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Overall no major complaints but it doesn't handle DMR (Dimensionally Modeled for Relational) very well. DMR modelling is a capability that IBM Cognos Framework Manager provides allowing you to specify dimensional information for relational metadata and allows for OLAP-style queries. However, the capability is not very efficient and, for example, if I'm using only 2 columns on a 20-column model, the software is not smart enough to exclude 18 columns and the query side gets progressively larger and larger until it's effectively unusable.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Why is their web application not working as fast as you think it should? They never know, and it is always a a bunch of shots in the dark to find out. Trying to download software from them is like trying to find a book at the library before computers were invented.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    I got very quick respons. After very little mail iterations, they decided to have online meeting to look together with me to the issue. They tried to solve it during the meeting. I had the impression that the customer care person really knew the system and was able to ask help from other colleagues when needed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Onsite training provided by IBM Cognos was effective and as expected. They did not perform training with our data which was a bit difficult for our end-users.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    At the official deployment of the original product Controlling and Accounting teams went to Lucca and were walked through the product, Excel usage, Design, ETL run
    Read full review
    Online Training
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The online courses they offer are thorough and presented in such a way that someone who isn't already familiar with the general design methodologies used in this field will be capable of making a good design. The training environments are provided as a fully self contained virtual machine with everything needed already to create the environments. We've had some persisting issues with the environments becoming unavailable, but support has been responsive when these issues arise and straightening them out for us
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    several times since the deployment of the product in 2013 we got on-line training on new functions or on very specific questions/issues (e.g. ETL customisation), followed by the usage of the Learning Hub since 2025
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Make sure that any custom tables that you have, are built into your metadata packages. You can still access them via SQL queries in Cognos, but it is much easier to have them as a part of the available metadata packages.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Power BI is stronger for quick ad-hoc analysis and dashboards, but IBM Cognos Analytics is better when consistency, precision, and mass distribution matter. Tableau is best for interactive analysis, while IBM Cognos Analytics is better for standardized, repeatable enterprise reporting. Sigma shines for customizable dashboards and drill-down analysis while IBM Cognos Analytics holds an edge in data discovery and visualization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the application is much easier. IBM Cognos TM1 had a lot of issues with certain modules that could not be open concurrently; this would often lead to phantom data being entered in the system. I have not had these issues with CCH Tagetik.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    We rate IBM Cognos Analytics a 9 out of 10 for overall scalability. The platform handles large numbers of users, reports, and analytical workloads very reliably. We have experienced strong performance even in demanding enterprise environments with substantial data volumes. Its architecture provides sufficient flexibility to scale resources according to demand, making it well suited for large, business-critical deployments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    EMAsphere
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • The platform can be pretty pricey.
    • Convoluted contracts and they fine you for any breach during audits.
    • Things are changed between releases without any warning and break.
    • It is second to none at being able to customize list and crosstab type reports.
    • You can easily set up a report to be emailed out every day and even have it export the report to a shared folder.
    • On-prem environments can be scaled up pretty much as much as you would like.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
    • A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
    • Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM Cognos Analytics Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

    Screenshot of Homepage