Certify is travel and expense management software developed by the company of the same name in Maine, which merged with Chrome River in 2019 to form Emburse.
N/A
IFS Applications
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Pricing
Emburse Certify
IFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Emburse Certify
IFS Applications
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$8 Expense report
No setup fee
Additional Details
Certify AP has volume based pricing based on processed invoices
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Emburse Certify
IFS Applications
Features
Emburse Certify
IFS Applications
Expense Management
Comparison of Expense Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
7.6
2 Ratings
8% below category average
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Employee Expense Reporting
8.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Corporate Card Reconciliation
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payment Management
Comparison of Payment Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
7.7
2 Ratings
4% below category average
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Customizable Approval Policies
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Financial Document Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payment Status Tracking
9.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payment Audit Trail
5.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Bill Detection
7.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced OCR
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.4
3 Ratings
50% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
6.83 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
5.83 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
16% above category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.75 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.5
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.15 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.0
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
9.15 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.1
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
8.85 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
7.95 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
7.94 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.64 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
8.64 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.64 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.4
2 Ratings
24% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
9.42 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
9.13 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
7.24 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.5
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.12 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
8.72 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
7.72 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
7.23 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
9.13 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.44 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Emburse Certify
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.0
4 Ratings
23% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
9.44 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Certify is not well suited for multi-dimensional ERPs. Although Certify 'offers' general ledger dimensions GLD, the use of them is extremely limited. Filtering on any GLD can only be done once. There is not the possibility for creating hierarchies with the dimensions. The only method of exporting is via a flat file or the open API, which I understand is quite limited. This software is for a smaller scaled business that is not trying to track across dimensions or create hierarchies. Data flow is one directional. I cannot emphasize enough the shortcomings of the reporting. The parameters are mostly based on expense dates rather than expense reports. There are entirely too many of them, and some of them perform the function!
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Integration with Amtrav or other travel booking systems. Certify has a tight integration with travel systems that makes it feel nearly like one cohesive tool.
Easy expense options. Use OCR on receipts, import from credit cards and merge items, approve and inquire about expenses. Track your submissions.
Easy UI. Friendly and easy to navigate without getting lost.
Reporting: I would like to see more chart availability from the program. We include various data points from Certify in our monthly financial statement package. Currently, we export data from the program and create our own pivot tables to create charts.
Dashboard feature: It would be nice to be able to use the data for a specific date and then be able to print that information.
Can't think of another one. As stated before, they listen to their customers so prior issues have been addressed and implemented.
If the integrations with our card programs had succeeded, I expect [Emburse] Certify would have worked well for expense submitters and approvers. During the short time that the American Express Business integration was active, transactions flowed smoothly, and the expense reporting and receipt matching functions were quite good. The [Emburse] Certify mobile app was particularly powerful and easy to use.
The measure of support is how well they respond when you really need them, like when the system is not performing correctly. We have been on the platform less than a year, and there have been at least 2 instances, where the platform was down. The 2nd time was the day before out fiscal year end. And they need a development website. When they are making changes to your LIVE instance, and things go wrong, the client is the first to know about it! I've come to understand that Certify has tiers of support. Those in tier 1, barely know more about the software than the users. I sent a request for a report that shows expense reports currently pending approval and after 5 days of back and forth I was told to build it myself.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Before Certify, there was only manual expense reports entered for our company. This took too much time for employees too finish and caused a delay of efficiency. With Certify, it is easier to access and finish each report with the right amount of effectiveness and efficiency it needs. Certify is really helpful in saving a lot of time for employees that do not have time.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
The organization and automatic flow of the expense report to approvers and then AP saves time for all. The user has agreed that it is easier and quicker to prepare the expense report and the managers and AP department finds the automated process to be quicker and more efficient. Time saved is money saved.
Certify can recognize if a duplicate expense is submitted or if an expense is submitted too late to be reimbursed according to our policies. This prevents us from reimbursing an expense in error.
We use a customized report to track a specific type of expense that gets submitted by our sales team. There is a limit on what can be spent on specific expenses that fall into an entertainment category and the report helps us to stay within the limits. Previously, without this tool, we had spent so much more time manually tracking these expenses and had gone over the limits, creating a deficiency in our processes.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.