servicePath™ CPQ+ is an enterprise CPQ and revenue lifecycle platform built specifically for mid-to-large technology service providers, including MSPs, SaaS, Field Services, Financial Services, and XaaS organizations. Unlike product-centric CPQ tools, servicePath™ CPQ+ is designed for complexity. It helps enterprises manage multi-region catalogs, hybrid pricing models, dynamic service bundles, and margin-sensitive deals in a low-code interface with agentic AI…
N/A
Pricing
Emptoris
servicePath™ CPQ+
Editions & Modules
Emptoris
$59.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Emptoris
servicePath™ CPQ+
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Emptoris
servicePath™ CPQ+
Features
Emptoris
servicePath™ CPQ+
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Emptoris
8.3
4 Ratings
3% above category average
servicePath™ CPQ+
-
Ratings
Contract creation
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract templates
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided logic
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Emptoris
7.9
4 Ratings
3% below category average
servicePath™ CPQ+
-
Ratings
Contract sharing
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract editing
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval process
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Emptoris
7.8
5 Ratings
6% below category average
servicePath™ CPQ+
-
Ratings
Contract database
7.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract search
7.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom contract reports
7.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tracking contract status
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance check
7.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
If you have a highly bureaucratic organization that is heavily focused on procurement, Emptoris can provide some value. It seemed to be very good at linking the contract information to procurement for better spend control. If you are trying to implement a standalone contract management solution that allows you to easily create contracts and store them in a central location, this isn't the tool for you. There doesn't appear to be a simplified implementation. In general, when a SaaS solution has a complicated and expensive implementation, I am very skeptical. This does not show that the vendor is trying to move customers forward on a single code base. If that many things need to be done during implementation, you are starting to customize the solution for every customer. This hurts the vendor's ability to scale and make improvements in the future.
Very well suited to technology and technology service provider businesses. Very much best in its class for those focused on more than just vendor product resale.
Document protection - the Check Out contract feature is a great way to allow external parties to make modifications to contract language without the ability to accept those changes. Those redlines can then be imported back into Emptoris and reviewed or further modified as needed.
Notifications & reminders - you can trigger an email manually from within the system, or you can configure automated notifications andreminders to alert users when a new task is received or has aged a given amount of days, etc.
Interview wizard - there is a lot of value in the interview wizard. Administrators can configure screens with selecting options via check boxes, radio buttons, or typed-in values. Variables and conditions can be used to selectively populate fields within the contract or apply other options, making for a quick and convenient method to generate contracts conforming to corporate standards.
Field customization - administrators can customize a list of options for various fields including contract substatus, address type, and user created business term variables.
Approvals - many different options are available to configure approvals to trigger automatically upon presenting and/or executing the contract including specific individuals, one or more approver groups, or based upon various criteria including terms within the contract, type of contract, or the contract's owning organization.
Reporting, Emptoris comes with standard reports which can not always can be fit into our business. This needs to be improved. I hope Emptoris is addressing this issue in their latest releases.
Though the feature of editing language in MS word is excellent, loading MS word takes time.
There are a lot of new, exciting products coming out in every field and I believe that there is always something better right over the horizon. If it was my choice, I would review my usage of Emptoris and other software periodically to make sure I'm using the most efficient software possible.
The above rating for the overall support from Emptoris is for their product / product support, roll out training and refresher training / ongoing training, which is not only good but superior. There is no major or reconizable bad review that can be given to Emptoris at this point in time, from where is stands.
I am a fan of Ariba to be used for the entire lifecycle of Sourcing. From RFX's to cutting PO's. I feel Emptoris misses the boat on the idea of a "One Stop Shop" for all of your Sourcing/Purchasing needs
ServicePath stood out from the rest due to: a) Product management including cost modeling, through CPQ, and client lifecycle management capability. b) Easy of use and simplification of complex scenarios. c) Easy to use, very capable, no code configured, and guided products.
We won the 2005 Baseline Magazine Award for best ROI related to a technology implementation with an ROI 5544% (see 2005 Baseline ROI Awards, GlaxoSmithkline).
We always felt we could do "two times the work, with half the people and deliver double the savings".