Epic Cadence is the company's medical scheduling module.
N/A
RXNT
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
RXNT is an ambulatory healthcare tech solution for medical practices and healthcare organizations. Since 1999, RXNT has offered integrated, customizable, ONC-certified Clinical and Practice Management software for medical offices, healthcare organizations, and specialists across the United States. RXNT's suite of technology includes provides Clinical EHR, Practice Management, Medical Billing and RCM, E-Prescribing, Practice Scheduling, Patient Portal for medical professionals.…
$118
per month per user
Pricing
Epic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
RXNT
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
EHR Bundle
$118
per month per provider
PM Bundle
$207
per month per provider
Full Suite
$319
per month per provider
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epic Cadence
RXNT
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
Pricing includes a free setup and training period, free data transfer and storage, and free in-house support. Plus, 24/7 cloud-based access, regular system upgrades, and mobile applications. All plans are per provider, and the pricing structure is an annual contract, billed monthly or yearly. A 10% discount is available for yearly billing.
Cadence Enterprise Scheduling is particularly useful in a multiple provider, multiple location scenario. It is also quite useful in situations where there are multiple rooms or pieces of equipment that need to be scheduled.
For my psychiatric telehealth practice, RXNT is just about perfect! Once the patient paperwork packet was completed, the portal is opened and my encounter templates were up and ready to use - I could spend time actually listening to the patient because my paperwork pulls into the chart and subsequent visits can be duplicated/updated easily. It just takes time to get everything completed and ready for use. I didn't have much down time between switching my EMRs which was a little stressful trying to get patient charts moved and my paperwork built.
The system is simple to use it helps schedulers create appointments and, avoids placing patients in situations where they are scheduled at the same time in different facilities.
It has many reports that can help managers maintain a smooth operation and shows what areas need to improve.
It has a one place for all scheduling information for schedulers to see patient's appointments, especially when patients do not recall where or when their next appointments will be.
The system can be created in such a way that you can control who can make appointments and who can't.
They system when built provides warnings to schedulers helping to minimize many scheduling errors like overbooking.
Questionnaires: EPIC seems to be very stringent on questionnaires and how may can be attached (only 1) on a Cadence level causing us to be quite inventive on how to get questioned answered on only certain visit types. One big stumbling block was the Ebola questionnaire. Currently we have a particular questionnaire for new Phy. Therapy patients which prevents us from adding the Ebola questionnaire to NEW patients. We are still struggling with this.
Patient Itinerates used for multiple appointments: Not very professional looking regardless of how you set up (OP visits, instructions etc: Most practices will not use the itinerary therefore adding dollars to having printing cards with the practice name on them. (the old fashioned way)
Building new DEP records: Wish there was a way to copy entire builds from one DEP to another.
Security": EPIC security is a nightmare to develop for multi faced users. RN that schedule appointments. Many of our practices are small practices that only have 2-3 people (the doc, the RN and the scheduler/biller . This creates the need for everyone to do everything from a scheduling perspective and building this security can become very cumbersome from practice to practice as each is unique.
The ads are very annoying and distracting. I would like to see these removed.
Sometimes when using the prescribing feature, the list of meds is unscrollable. This is likely a glitch that could be fixed.
Same thing after choosing a pharmacy. The preview page of Rx is unscrollable, making it impossible to see all of them. Would like to see this fixed as well.
Would like to be able to add more templates under the macros but it is not clear how to do this.
As stated earlier, it seems to be the best out there, from a built perspective as well as a user application. While some practices feel it to be time consuming (Cadence/Prelude) together others who see the whole integration thru the Epicare and Resolute systems love it. From an IT perspective, while sometimes cumbersome to build, the end results are pleasing and satisfying. We can usually accomplish what we set out to do with the practice vision in mind.
Having used other systems, there are still items I would like to see added to this platform. Additional forms, understanding of how to load those forms into the system. Ability for clients to access those forms. And the ability to upload forms that are coming in externally. This would be helpful.
EPIC has been great in their support and communication at all hours. They also openly communicate when an application TS (Technical Support) will be away and who is covering for that person. During standard non working hours - you always know what number and who to call to get resolution to issues that arise at those times
Use implementation team from EPIC but know what you want and make sure that it=s what you get. You can be easily swayed by lack of knowledge on the application and therefore decisions are made that are not correct and then have to be redone. EPIC including Cadence needs a great understanding of the workflows you currently have and how they will be impacted by your build. We had a great understanding of the existing workflows in the offices, however lack of knowledge on the Cadence IT side, had a large impact on what was delivered as our implementers believed that a standard EPIC workflow would suffice and did not.
Centricity was limited in ability to scale and customize compared to Cadence for our environment. Also the regular updates for Cadence vs. Centricity is where Cadence really shines. Vendor support is also much better with Cadence over Centricity. We also like the robust capability of the reporting module in Cadence over other vendors.
RXNT offers better quality and more customization for the cost. Valant was very expensive regardless if you wanted a few features or the entire EHR. eClinical Works is easy to duplicate records but then it can take a while to update with current information. And their updated version...you might need a magnifying glass especially if you are using on a laptop. I love the larger font and overall appeal of RXNT much better
