Epsilon PeopleCloud (formerly the Agility platform with Agility Harmony) is an enterprise-level email marketing and cross-channel campaign management platform competing with Responsys, Cheetah Mail, ExactTarget, etc. The vendor has a strong international presence with staff in 14 countries.
N/A
Mail250
Score1 out of 10
N/A
Mail250 is an e-mail marketing delivery platform.
$20
per month
Pricing
Epsilon PeopleCloud
Mail250
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$20
month
Plus
$30
month
Plus Pro
$50
month
Dedicated
$150
month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epsilon PeopleCloud
Mail250
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Epsilon PeopleCloud
Mail250
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Epsilon PeopleCloud and Mail250
Feature
Epsilon PeopleCloud
-
Ratings
Mail250
6.3
1 Ratings
24% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Epsilon PeopleCloud and Mail250
Feature
Epsilon PeopleCloud
-
Ratings
Mail250
6.0
1 Ratings
24% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Epsilon PeopleCloud and Mail250
Appropriate for large organizations who want customization in their emails. The tool - while intuitive if you have previous background - is hefty and large in scope of capabilities. It's great for organizations who have multiple users and shows the name of person who last made changes. The reporting is really good - but may be a bit overwhelming for organizations who don't need a lot of detailed information
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The tool could be improved to "remember" where you last left off (specific user). Having to constantly retrace steps if you get logged out is annoying.
Hitting the "back" arrow sends you back to a main section, when it should send you back to where you previously were.
It would be nice to see performance reports available within the campaign itself, as well as within the reporting section.
Ability to NOT be able to change anything in a campaign after it has launched. This has happened multiple times. We usually copy a previous campaign to start a new one but often, we end up changing content on the version we are copying from -- this is very annoying and dangerous.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
While both Epsilon Agility Harmony and Oracle Responsys are great for larger organizations that send a lot of emails, I think Epsilon Agility Harmony is more robust than Responsys and is easier to use. It is significantly more complex than HubSpot and requires previous knowledge of using an email tool that has content blocks and or dynamic content.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I picked Mail250 because they seem designed for sending 1-time bulk mail for an affordable price. Open rates for MailerLite, GetResponse, ConvertKit, and SendPulse were all over 50%. Sender.net was extremely low at under 10%. Mail250 was around 10%, but also had an extremely high bounce rate of 10%.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info