FileHold Document Management vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FileHold Document Management | Score7.7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | FileHold is a document and records management software. FileHold is integrated with both Microsoft Office and Microsoft Teams and provides secure single log in to both FileHold and Office 365. FileHold can be deployed on a customers own servers or private cloud or hosted by FileHold on the Azure Cloud Standard features include; document scanning, version control, search, tagging, full user audit trail, archiving and scheduled disposition. Out of the box, users can search the FileHold… | $30 per month per seat |
![]() Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving | Score8.4 out of 10 | N/A | Exchange Online Archiving from Microsoft is a tool that helps the user solve archiving, compliance, regulatory, and eDiscovery challenges. Hosted on Microsoft globally redundant servers, with IT-level phone support 24 hours a day, seven days a week, Exchange Online Archiving is compatible with Exchange Server 2019, 2016, 2013, and 2010. It’s also available as an add-on service for mailboxes that are hosted online. | $3 per month per user |
| FileHold Document Management | Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | In all cases the price per user will decrease as more users are added to the system. FileHold has many optional and custom features that can be chosen and will change the price. For outright purchase of a license there is an optional 20% per year support and upgrade fee. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FileHold Document Management | Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| FileHold Document Management | Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | Amazon S3 Glacier Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | Google Vault Score9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | Arctera Enterprise Vault Score5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FileHold Document Management | Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 8.3 |
| Usability | 6.0 | - |
| Performance | 7.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 6.0 | - |
| FileHold Document Management | Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| ![]()
|
| Pros |
| ![]()
|
| Cons |
| ![]()
|
| Usability |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| ![]()
|
| Return on Investment |
| ![]()
|
| ScreenShots | FileHold Document Management Screenshots |







