TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Forcepoint CASB vs. Solutions2Share Teams Manager

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Forcepoint CASB

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AForcepoint CASB delivers comprehensive security for SaaS and Generative AI applications by combining API integration with real-time inline controls, ensuring sensitive data stays protected without compromising performance or user experience.N/A

    Teams Manager

    Score8 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    IT administrators can keep control of their Microsoft 365 environment with Teams Manager. Teams Manager is used to prevent the uncontrolled creation of Teams and Groups and automate governance processes. Key Features: • Governance Dashboard and Reports – provides an overview of the M365 environment (inactive or ownerless teams, teams with guests etc.) • Provisioning of new teams & SharePoint sites – with channels,…

    $1.60

    per year

    Pricing
    Forcepoint CASBTeams Manager
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Extra Large (4,000+ users)
    $1.60
    per year per user
    Small (up to 249 users)
    1,599
    per year per installation
    Medium (up to 999 users)
    4,049
    per year per installation
    Large (up to 4000 users)
    6,499
    per year per installation
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Forcepoint CASBTeams Manager
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Prices are starting prices. Not listed here are the different support and service packages.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Forcepoint CASBTeams Manager
    Considered Both Products
    Forcepoint
    No answer on this topic
    Solutions2Share
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    User Ratings
    Forcepoint CASBTeams Manager
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Forcepoint CASBTeams Manager
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Forcepoint
    It is appropriate for medium to large-scale enterprises, especially the ones that have remote employees. The live-monitoring feature is extremely useful in this case. However, the implementation and initial processing are headache-inducing so you definitely need a dedicated IT team. Be warned though, that not only is their interface quite complex, their customer service is also extremely unhelpful so you won't be able to implement this or tackle any issues without a skilled team. But if that isn't an issue, this is definitely worth a try!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Solutions2Share
    It's well suited if you or your organization performs tasks incorporating other Microsoft programs such as OneNote or Planner. Teams Manager allows for easy management of that software usage; if you do not use any of those, I'm not sure if there is much advantage in using it to manage workflow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Forcepoint
    • Integration with Forcepoint DLP.
    • Excellent in monitoring shadow IT.
    • Cloud Monitoring can be conducted.
    • UEBA is excellent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Solutions2Share
    • Handles different teams and teams members
    • Giving them permissions as per their job profile and necessity
    • Seeing the projects' progress through one platform
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Forcepoint
    • Better reports
    • Better technical support
    • Better integration with other solutions as proxy and onpremise DLP
    • Did I say better support?
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Solutions2Share
    • user interface can be enhanced to seperate the color coding for different channels
    • It would be great to receive notifications in Outlook for Shifts and be able to approve/deny requests and schedule changes there while it's synced with the Outlook calendar.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Forcepoint
    The platform is really good but needs a lot of customization and effort. Need to build an AI platform that will help in customizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Solutions2Share
    It is a well-designed and polished application on Teams. Most of its issues stem from Teams UI and UX, which could be improved further. However, if you can fit the team manager to your needs, it can become a very powerful tool to manage data flow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Forcepoint
    The expertise is highly lacking in the implementation side.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Solutions2Share
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Forcepoint
    The interface of both the softwares is complex, but Forcepoint is certainly more complicated. But once you get past that, it is quite smooth and offers a lot of amazing features. It is one of the best options for remote security, although I would love to see more features - like encryption. The one place where it truly lacks is customer service, and since it has such an intricate implementation procedure, this one carries a lot of weight and needs to be improved to make this software even more accessible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Solutions2Share
    We still use it for our one-off situations, but mostly stick to Teams as it is much more user-friendly and allows better sharing capabilities through virtual meetings. Skype is not as easily customized, so it's a no-brainer to use Microsoft Teams and Team Manager for all of our instant messaging and virtual meeting needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Forcepoint
    • We are working on strategies to understand what to do with the information that CASB gave to us, it would be good if Forcepoint gives us a few key points but they haven't.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Solutions2Share
    • Positive in regards to easy access to quick answers through instant messaging
    • Positive in that the Managers have a secure place to go to retrieve sensitive information.
    • Negative in that we do not fully utilize the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Teams Manager Screenshots

    Screenshot of Governance Dashboard and Reports – for an overview of Microsoft 365 environmentsScreenshot of Automated request and approval process for new teams, M365 groups and SharePoint sitesScreenshot of Templates and provisioning for teams and SharePoint sites (with channels, tabs, apps, folders, Planner with tasks, OneNote with content and more)Screenshot of Lifecycles for teams: inactive or obsolete teams can automatically be archived or even deleted after a specified period of timeScreenshot of Naming conventions for teams, OneNotes, Planners and SharePoint URLs: rules for uniform, relevant names with predefined prefixes and suffixesScreenshot of Policy packages for teams: automatically enforce governance policies for team requests, approvals, access reviews and more