Foundation Software headquartered in Strongsville, Ohio offers their construction accounting and payroll software. The vendor states that their job costing construction accounting software is designed to be easy to use and provides the accounting and management tools needed to run a successful construction business.
N/A
JAGGAER
Score6.2 out of 10
N/A
JAGGAER is a procure-to-pay provider in the higher education and government sectors. JAGGAER eProcurement and strategic sourcing customers gain access to suppliers on a scalable, customizable platform. The JAGGAER SaaS-based, source-to-settle solution provides unparalleled visibility, insights and recommendations to procurement leaders and suppliers. The result is a fluid supply chain driven by spend analysis, contract management, and an accounts payable solutions.
N/A
Pricing
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
JAGGAER
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
JAGGAER
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
JAGGAER
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Foundation Software Construction Accounting and JAGGAER
Feature
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
7.4
4 Ratings
6% above category average
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
5.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
9.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
5.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Foundation Software Construction Accounting and JAGGAER
Feature
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
8.0
4 Ratings
16% above category average
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Foundation Software Construction Accounting and JAGGAER
Feature
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
7.7
3 Ratings
12% above category average
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Foundation Software Construction Accounting and JAGGAER
Feature
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
8.2
4 Ratings
7% above category average
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Dashboards
9.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Foundation Software Construction Accounting and JAGGAER
Feature
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
9.1
4 Ratings
17% above category average
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
9.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
7.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change orders
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Foundation Software Construction Accounting and JAGGAER
Working as a general contractor or subcontractor, I highly recommend Foundation Software Construction Accounting. I would not recommend it for anything outside construction, but it could still be used for other businesses.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As a purchasing app, it is excellent. I cannot speak to its usefulness in the AP area. it may be less useful in a different environment, such as manufacturing. For research and healthcare use, it is excellent. Also, we use Banner as our ERP. SciQuest is well versed with integrating with Banner. Users with a different ERP may experience less pleasant results.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Source to settle: Although we did not purchase all the new applications in the suite SciQuest made, what we did use, worked and worked nicely. With SciQuest you can get a turn-key system.
I love the way SciQuest rolls out changes, measuring customer feedback, and rolling out major changes 3 times a year. Like clockwork you know what to expect ahead of time, deciding whether or not you need a particular enhancement (if optional), having plenty of time to make adjustments in business processes if needed, and/or user-base announcements.
I was always astonished to see both clients and potential clients come to the conferences. SciQuest would allow the "mixing" of clients and potential clients, apparently unafraid of any negative commentaries the potential clients might get. That has always been impressive to me as a techie myself.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Their existing pricing model for the number of Suppliers onboarded or removed has been a little disappointing as there are times when suppliers do have to be switched out.
They have greatly helped in making UNSPSC updating easier, but I would like to be able to get an extract with a delta that would make it easier for us to update our ERP as this information needs to be stored on both sides.
There are some things it lacks, certain reports or history audits. I have to call them to do certain things-submit a ticket and wait on someone to call back instead of getting someone immediately. Especially if it's urgent. I have to wait on them to push an update-and they usually run a week or 2 later- to pull quarterly or annual tax forms.
Simplified and user friendly system that has been implemented across our entire institute and with all of our vendors. We really like this program and it works well for us. Changing to another program would be a significant time investment and hassle
I give Foundation Software Construction Accounting this rating because once you learn the software and how detailed its with multiple steps to complete transactions, it is very user friendly and keeps you from making user errors.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
There is a 3 month learning curve and then the features are easy to use. My AP team processes 400 invoices daily through the system. The things to watch for are vendor billing mistakes (no/incorrect PO number, information discrepancies) and buyer purchase request inconsistencies. Those are part of AP anyway so maybe it is what it is. The Sciquest AP software performs as designed some improvements needed. In our system I have documented a list of 60 improvements that could increase throughput up to 50%. Those improvements include making the AP records GUI format more customized for AP purposes, and improving the QC tolerance functionality, which can be laborious to sync (Match).
They have had only a couple of very quick occasions where they were down for 1-2 minutes. One time they had a problem adding attachments. Very Reliable!
Having used SciQuest for over five years and having their competitors, SciQuest offers the best user experience and integration between vendors and ERP.
They usually respond to medium-to-low priority issues very quickly, and high priority issues almost instantly. Their support team is knowledgeable and responsive. Their Supplier Enablement team is very good and is a feature that most of their competitors don't have. The company makes a serious effort to maintain good relationships with their customers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We had an internal project manager who was well versed in PMI methodologies. I think the implementation would have gone far less successfully, or may even have failed entirely, without her. She was able to do all the things a project manager is supposed to do, and in an ordered and organized manner.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Personally, I did not have a hand in deciding the software, but for our company is has not led to increased productivity or made things easier. It has been more difficult for payroll to be inputted correctly and the payroll reports for certified payroll often come out incorrect and we need to manually figure out how to correct the issues and get them in correctly
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Again, our SciQuest system integrates with Banner. Banner does have a way to create, approve and report on POs. However, the SciQuest product is so much more user friendly, so the learning curve is very steep. Also, SciQuest gives us a lot more detail in our reporting and PO history, which is helpful when trying to remember what happened 6 month ago
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Highly reliable remotely hosted PTP solution that interfaces with our remote OCR vendor and with university sited operational servers. Twice a year over the last 3 years a SciQuest/OCR system file handling or network problem occurs that gets fixed within a day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Customers seem to be fine with selecting requisition items and having them pushed back via carts to a legacy system.
Converting one's legacy ERP system to a SaaS solution may prove to be too much of an overhaul in regards to converting to a new set of rules which do not fit exactly with current business processes. The inability to enhance in great detail is also a drawback for customers coming from a highly modifiable system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info