Google Cloud Contact Center AI vs. OpenText CX-E Voice

Well suited for sites where the product is hardware because with those if there are any questions then the site could help eliminate having to contact the company directly and waiting for answers days later. This would be suited for products as the answer could be given and the more complex questions would be directed to the company.

Incentivized

OpenText CX-E Voice has been a solid and reliable application and a valuable component of our voice infrastructure. Support has been consistently excellent.

Incentivized

• Google Cloud Contact Center AI is based on the same foundation infrastructure and services as Google Assistant, therefore, it is robust and flexible. The APIs are very well built and documented as well. Any newbie can start using the service with a very little learning curve.
• Seamless integrations are also a great add-on. Google makes sure that Contact Center AI service integrates well with leading customer service platforms which helps any user to use only the required functionalities from Contact Center AI and meanwhile use any other primary platform.
• Robust documentation which is always alive and is updated within no time is of great help! Google makes sure its end customers know what to do where and when in clear plain text and any issues/ bugs are also documented.

Incentivized

• Call recording is useful. It was quite needed actually because it does not just help with keeping records, but also feedback for the employee because if something gets escalated, we can go through the call again to see where mistakes can be avoided in the future.
• IVR is another well thought out tool.
• Ability to distribute calls is top notch.

Incentivized

• It's still in the beginning phase of sentimental Analysis and more data sets can really help during tough conversations.
• Automation can be made a little simpler and basic for anyone to be able to work on it.
• Each instance of the software can have its own AI learning for a wider range of real time issues.

Incentivized

• Pricing Tier
• Glitch during call sometimes.
• Regular enhancements for every release.

Incentivized

We are happy with the implementation and functionality of the software and associated systems. In general, unless something better can replace this system we intend on continuing. We think the ease of systems implementation and integration adds value and substantiates the use and excellent functionality of the product and associated services.

Incentivized

Generally intuitive and easy to learn. I would like more guides but the learning curve is rather quick and makes the software rather an easy study for the average user. Generally, the support and functionality of the software make for a generally good outcome and easy implementation of the software and user experience.

Incentivized

Apart from reports, OpenText CX-E Voice ease of use is consistently excellent

Incentivized

Only IBM Watson Assistant has been the one we have used in the company, in fact, it was the first to use it because currently in the market there are not many options to use, and if there are they are not receiving enough publicity, so we have limited ourselves to google cloud contact center AI.

Incentivized

We choosed OpenText TeamQ instead of acmatel CCS because of its simple nature. Acmatel CCS was having limited feature with call tracking support. Also, OpenText TeamQ is one of the better tool when you consider the fact of consistency in calling support. I am totally grateful that I had choosen this tool for our business demand.

Incentivized

• Reduced the number of minutes spent by live agents on trivial queries.
• Our client saved thousands of dollars by using the AI contact center as now the agents spend most of their time solving real issues.
• Customer satisfaction got increased exponentially.

Incentivized

• Supervision can work remotely.
• We do not need to invest in new computer telephony.
• Global employee can be connected to the same interface.

Incentivized