RSMeans data, from Gordian (formerly Costworks) is a construction and estimation software offering acquired by the Gordian Group in 2014. It includes cost books and construction project estimating software tools.
N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum is a cloud-based construction ERP suite with project management, accounting, resource management, and reporting and analytics. Key features include workflow automation and collaboration tools, document imaging and sharing, cost estimating tools, and RFI management tools.
N/A
Pricing
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
Viewpoint Spectrum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
Viewpoint Spectrum
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Prospective buyers may contact vendor directly for a price quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
Viewpoint Spectrum
Features
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
Viewpoint Spectrum
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
7.8
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost calculator
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bid creation
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.0
22 Ratings
38% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
7.722 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
7.016 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.219 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.3
9 Ratings
33% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
5.39 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.3
27 Ratings
1% below category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.522 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
7.027 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
3.7
30 Ratings
66% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
7.829 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
3.430 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
2.528 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.8
28 Ratings
14% above category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
8.027 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
8.025 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
9.28 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.319 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
8.722 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
9.219 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.423 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.2
17 Ratings
25% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
5.117 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
7.46 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
15 Ratings
0% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
7.212 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
7.213 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
8.111 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.1
27 Ratings
8% above category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
9.523 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.022 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
8.823 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.7
7 Ratings
5% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
7.16 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.36 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
7.24 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Well Suited: Construction cost estimates for new larger projects where the construction will start within the next 6-9 months. Budgetary estimates for future buildings through its square foot models. Not Well Suited: Not accurate enough on small projects where labor, travel to sites, and OH&P are a higher percentage of unit costs than on larger projects where these costs are spread out across more units.
The Installation team is amazing. They provide clear guidance at the beginning of the process regarding what is expected and what needs to be done. The implementation manager follows up monthly with you to make sure you are on track and if you need additional help. They are very helpful and responsive in resolving issues.
CostWorks is very good at generating quick and valid estimates for standardized facilities such as office buildings, schools, etc. It allows you to validate other cost estimates at the UniFormat level when doing an estimate validation.
CostWorks' database of detailed line-items is a very resourceful asset when it comes to finding a very specific line-item. Sometimes, when using Success or MII, I will have CostWorks open on the other screen so I can find an item that the other softwares just don't have and build it into the other software from the CostWorks entry.
CostWorks does a very good job of generating reports that are both well-developed and have enough detail at the summary level to be able to sit with a client or a project manager and have them follow along and understand without being overwhelmed with detail and numbers.
Support isn't readily available. You can submit a ticket and wait days before it's picked up. Even critical issues (system outages) can wait an hour or two before someone responds.
Large companies will feel limited. This product wasn't designed to handle large amounts of data, and performance seems to slow when there are more than 80 concurrent users.
The new developments are limited. HR Management is less robust than a third-party product specializing in HR Management. Viewpoint Analytics is nowhere near as robust as Power BI or Tableau.
There's a little bit of a learning curve, but once you've been working in the system for a while, it becomes second nature. I would say that out of all of the other software that I've personally used, Spectrum has been the easiest one to pick up and learn quickly
For the most part the product is very reliable. Since we are hosted we sometimes have connectivity issues but I would say that is more our ISP than Spectrum.
The support has recently changed. Last year, you could call in and get an immediate response. Now that doesn't seem possible unless you have an urgent situation with access to the software, payroll or payables. I have found that using chat or e-mail works nicely for the most part, but sometimes I feel it would be easier if someone from support would jump on our site and take a first-hand look rather than going back and forth
Our trainer was excellent and navigated the time zone differences expertly. She gave us test assignments to complete and was available for questions at any time.
CostWorks is a unique software for estimating as compared to the other softwares I have listed above. PACES is mostly used for federal modeling and really cannot be compared to Costworks. It has its own developed modeling database and has its own quirkiness and issues. MII has been developed for the USACE and utilized a user-developed folder structure and RS Means Database. I use CostWorks along side this software to find line-items that are not in the MII RS Means Database. Success has been developed for NAVFAC and again, utilizes a user-developed folder structure and RS Means Database. When I use this software, I ALWAYS have CostWorks open on the other screen as Success' RS Means database is extremely lacking when it comes to the number of detail line-items. Timberline is by SAGE and I use it mostly for DOS and FAA work. Of the 3 RS Means Database softwares, this one has the most detailed database for reference, however, there are times when I do have to look up an item that Timberline does not have and the first software I open is CostWorks.
I have previously used Sage Masterbuilder, another construction industry software. This has been a number of years ago. The company I am working for already had Spectrum and have been using it for as long as it has been around when it was known as Forefront. Based on conversations I've had with the personnel that were here at the time of purchase, Spectrum clicked off all the boxes they were looking for.
You can grant user specific access which is nice. Project managers do not need all the same modules as Accounting. But Accounting does need access to PM modules as well
I don't really see any "negative" impacts on my business or my ROI by purchasing CostWorks. It's a valuable tool that we use, however, some of my colleagues do not use it or use it very infrequently.
I find it well worth the cost even though we don't develop complete estimates in CostWorks due to client dictated softwares.
It has provided very quickly-built estimating models that let our team and project managers know that the RFP or the task that they are contemplating bidding on or starting to work on is actually feasible to construction given the budget and directive.