Grasshopper vs. Lifesize CxEngage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Grasshopper
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Grasshopper is an IP telephony business communication solution that provides companies with a toll-free or local phone number. It has both desktop and mobile applications and includes features such as custom greeting recording, call forwarding, call transfer, call reporting, and voicemail.
$29
per month
Lifesize CxEngage
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
CxEngage is a cloud contact center solution designed to meet users' needs and work in their environment. Unlike monolithic architectures and on-premises solutions, CxEngage is a ‘born-in-the-cloud’ platform to deliver unified visibility across voice, video, and digital channels. CxEngage is designed to just work anywhere, and to be implemented in a few days or weeks.
$85
per month per user
Pricing
GrasshopperLifesize CxEngage
Editions & Modules
Solo
$29
per month
Partner
$49
per month
Small Business
$89
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GrasshopperLifesize CxEngage
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GrasshopperLifesize CxEngage
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
GrasshopperLifesize CxEngage
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
9.7
46 Ratings
20% above category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Hosted PBX9.423 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)10.024 Ratings00 Ratings
User templates10.019 Ratings00 Ratings
Call reports9.433 Ratings00 Ratings
Directory of employee names9.434 Ratings00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
9.6
51 Ratings
14% above category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Answering rules9.247 Ratings00 Ratings
Call recording9.622 Ratings00 Ratings
Call park9.812 Ratings00 Ratings
Call screening10.036 Ratings00 Ratings
Message alerts9.243 Ratings00 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
7.9
12 Ratings
1% below category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Video conferencing7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio conferencing7.77 Ratings00 Ratings
Video screen sharing8.23 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant messaging8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
8.9
48 Ratings
10% above category average
Lifesize CxEngage
-
Ratings
Mobile app for iOS8.935 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android8.929 Ratings00 Ratings
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
-
Ratings
Lifesize CxEngage
6.9
2 Ratings
19% below category average
Agent dashboard00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Outbound response00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Call forwarding00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Interactive voice response00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
REST APIs00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Call tracking00 Ratings7.72 Ratings
Multichannel integration00 Ratings6.42 Ratings
CRM software integration00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
-
Ratings
Lifesize CxEngage
7.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
Inbound call routing00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Recording00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
Call analytics00 Ratings6.82 Ratings
Historical reporting00 Ratings5.92 Ratings
Live reporting00 Ratings6.42 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GrasshopperLifesize CxEngage
Small Businesses
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 8.6 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 8.6 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GrasshopperLifesize CxEngage
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(56 ratings)
7.7
(2 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(42 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
GrasshopperLifesize CxEngage
Likelihood to Recommend
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
Grasshopper is well suited for basic needs of texting in and out as well as calling out if you would like to avoid using your personal line. It also eliminates the need to have a dedicated land land in your office or business. You can obtain a vanity number and forward calls through grasshopper.
Read full review
Lifesize
CxEngage can handle some more complex flow options that other vendors don't seem to be able to do. The integration for voice calls with Salesforce is a huge plus. The integration of email support with Salesforce is a BIG miss. After fighting with it for a year, we finally just turned it off and use Salesforce Omnichannel for email support. Chat using Salesforce Live Agent worked fine enough.
Read full review
Pros
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
  • I like that there are differing voicemails for each extension, to keep up with the image of calling a separate line.
  • I love the voicemail text emails. I believe we pay a little extra, but worth every penny for those urgent calls while I am in a meeting.
  • The cost is very reasonable for the value added to our company.
Read full review
Lifesize
  • Great flexibility working with flow creation and editing
  • Great support staff
  • Good overall package for workforce management and quality monitoring
  • Integrates well with our tools.
Read full review
Cons
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
  • It would be nice to have the ability to transfer some calls to another Grasshopper IVR, for those customers who mistakenly dial the wrong number (we have two incoming numbers, one for corporate and one for sales).
  • Likewise, it would be nice to have the ability to forward to a toll-free number, which would have allowed us to work around the inability to transfer between IVRs (see above).
  • Lastly, it would be great to have an 'emergency' switch setting (default off but could be toggled on) that would let us override all IVR settings and transfer all incoming calls elsewhere (either to a direct dial or toll free number) for those rare times when we cannot take any calls (such as a weather emergency OR the one time each year we take all of our staff on a retreat) - that would allow us to send all calls to a backup answering service rather than just voicemail.
Read full review
Lifesize
  • Stronger support and more reliable system for users not on a commercial network
  • Consumer friendly and intuitive reporting and dashboard tools. build canned reports
  • Reporting: Ability to get a combined SVL for all queues included on a report (now we manually calculate after exporting the report into excel). Same for all major data points (ASA, AHT, etc.)
  • Ability to include abandoned calls and an abandonment percentage which excludes short abandons on the Queue summary report. Now the report just shows total abandons and abandonment percentage so if we want to exclude short abandons we have to pull a separate report to find out how many calls abandoned in less than 10 seconds then calculate the "true abandoned number" (calls abandoned minus short abandons)
  • Ability to change what is considered a "short abandon" and then report on it. Right now the only option is the built in tracking of calls that abandoned in equal to or less than 10 seconds.
  • Ability to "save" an agents "default" skill profile so that any changes we make can be returned to "BAU" with a click of a button
  • quicker data/historical report retrieval
  • way to separate what we have listed as a queue name for reporting vs. what is used for the queue name in the "whisper" (the issue we had with WT queue naming conventions because we had to have the whisper be super precise)
Read full review
Usability
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
The admin functions are kind of confusing in the old interface which was my most recent experience on the admin side.
Read full review
Lifesize
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
When I was setting up my account I contacted support a couple of times. They were also very professional, personable, and helpful. Their response is prompt and thorough. I'm confident I can get any question answered as well as help with any issue I might have. That's pretty important to me.
Read full review
Lifesize
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
No answers on this topic
Lifesize
We implemented in 2018 and were only given 8 weeks to do it...as per the direction of our parent company at the time. Serenova at the time responded well and we were able to go Live within 8-weeks...albeit the product overall was a big change and had gaps in features over our previous contact management solution.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
I have not used any other phone services like Grasshopper. I know that there is another option out there called Ruby, which is more like a virtual receptionist but since I did not try it out I cannot compare the two. When I started my company I found the services that Grasshopper offers to be perfect. It still works for us and we have no need to change to anything else right now.
Read full review
Lifesize
It's been too many years...I don't remember. Except in 2021 we looked briefly at Amazon and Salesforce call center offerings. Both were too basic at the time that even if we got a great deal on licensing (we are a Salesforce house for other things), we couldn't easily (or at all) do things like Callbacks and some of the more robust flow buildouts that we have in place today with Lifesize.
Read full review
Return on Investment
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
  • It's allowed us to keep cost down. Other phone systems can seriously get outrageous in implementation and monthly fees!
  • It's allowed our team the confidence to work in locations outside of the office and still be seen as professionals.
  • It's decreased the amount of time spent on unwanted sales calls via the call screening application.
Read full review
Lifesize
  • lower operational costs
  • improved agent productivity
  • improved flexibility in design and admin work
Read full review
ScreenShots

Lifesize CxEngage Screenshots

Screenshot of Agent Interface - SFDC Integrated AgentScreenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Desktop Chat InteractionScreenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Mockup 1Screenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Mockup 2Screenshot of Chat - Mockup 1Screenshot of Chat - Mockup 2