HCL Digital Experience is based on the former IBM Web Content Manager and IBM WebSphere Portal products, acquired by HCL Technologies from IBM in late 2018. The product allows the user to create, manage and deliver engaging omnichannel digital experiences to audiences with responsive content, targeted offers, seamlessly integrated applications and consistent branding across channels (web, mobile, and hybrid mobile/web applications and more).
N/A
Modern Campus CMS
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Modern Campus CMS (formerly Omni Campus) is a CMS for institutions of higher education. It can be deployed as a cloud-based service or hosted locally. It is built in Java, uses open standards, and is extensible through APIs.
N/A
Pricing
HCL Digital Experience
Modern Campus CMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HCL Digital Experience
Modern Campus CMS
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HCL Digital Experience
Modern Campus CMS
Considered Both Products
HCL Digital Experience
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose HCL Digital Experience
Each of the options had good points and bad points. Building a site with tight integration to HCL Commerce and SAP backend systems was just easier with HCL DX. Security is also a concern and HCL DX provided better fine-grained security across the board. HCL DX also allowed us …
IBM Web Content Manager comes with IBM WebSphere Portal. Both [have been] leaders in the portals and content management space for a long time with proven capabilities. Our clients also have other products from the IBM stack and they fit along nicely.
I used Liferay WCM; the open source system is too customizable such that what you get out of the box is not adequate. However, the portal pages in Liferay blend better with WCM than IBM: This is not always an advantage if you want to build a WCM site separated from portal …
During the RFP process, we also evaluated Hannon Hill Cascade and Terminal Four. Both CMS systems had pros and cons, but overall, OU Campus was an easy choice. The features were better, non-technical users liked the simplicity of the interface, and the price was competitive.
We selected OU Campus after reviewing a number of CMS products and are extremely happy.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Modern Campus CMS
Before using OU Campus Content Management System we were using Adobe's DreamWeaver suite for creating and maintaining web pages. The core web development environment was cumbersome to set up. Non-tech people also had trouble understanding how the web works and how web pages are …
I don't know how OU Campus stacks against other products because I have been using OU Campus while I have been employed at my university.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Modern Campus CMS
MUCH easier to use than other CMS systems. Quite intuitive. Pleasant interface. Reduces anxiety for beggining users of cms system, and supports stronger users comfortable doing more.
I have evaluated Ektron, PHP Nuke, Drupal, Joomla!, typo3, Reason and SharePoint. OU Campus outshines all of these in the web CMS space. The OU Campus interface is more intuitive, more user-friendly, and the system itself is more flexible and scalable and capable in almost …
Features
HCL Digital Experience
Modern Campus CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
HCL Digital Experience
5.0
Ratings
48% below category average
Modern Campus CMS
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Role-based user permissions
5.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
HCL Digital Experience
4.1
Ratings
66% below category average
Modern Campus CMS
9.3
Ratings
18% above category average
API
4.10 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
4.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
HCL Digital Experience
2.9
Ratings
85% below category average
Modern Campus CMS
8.9
Ratings
13% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
7.00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
3.10 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Admin section
3.10 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Page templates
1.10 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Library of website themes
1.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
4.00 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Publishing workflow
1.10 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Form generator
3.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Web Content Manager is well suited for intranet employee portals, websites which drive extensive marketing content, and e-commerce sites to provide product images and details. It cannot be used a document management system to store large volumes of data as it's purely a web content management system.
This website works well in an academic setting. It's easy to add pages as your site expands/grows. It's really easy to use and modify pages once you know what you're doing, but it can be a little tricky to get the hang of it at first. It is definitely useful to have in-person or virtual training before you dive in.
Well designed web content management system with clearly defined relationships between the various web content objects such as sites, site areas, authoring templates, presentation templates, library resources, components, web content objects, etc.
Can create robust content creation and publishing workflows with workflow stages and workflow actions
Web Content can be rendered on multiple devices and browsers in a responsive and adaptive manner.
Assets are easily managed and can be edited independently of the page they exist on.
Version history is handled well. Allows for a comment section to note what changes have been made.
Dependency tags are perfect for media that is used in several places. Upload a photo once, use it in multiple places, edit the photo or its description in one place.
Search is not working well. We could not get it work even we worked it with IBM support.
Java Applet in Ephox editor is pain. You have to watch that you update your Java version correctly or You cannot edit anything. This might work somehow on enterprise environment with tight workstation configuration. I think that Java Applet editor is the worst part of IBM WCM
IBM WCM needs lot of capacity on database and appserver.
OU Campus could use some improving on their upload changes as far as naming the document because when you are trying to upload the same document with minor revisions, OU Campus requires you to change the name of the document within OU Campus which creates multiple documents in the workfolder.
When naming documents to upload into OU Campus, it would be nice if we could name out documents the way we would instead of having to put an underscore to indicate a space in the document. Most users of OU Campus has not had proper training to know that you need to do that.
IBM products always moves forward to adapt to new requirements and technologies. I have used versions 6, 6.1, 7 and 8 of IBM WCM, and I know IBM is ready to revamp the tool based on emerging needs, and still provide the capabilities to migrate your old system to the newer versions.
I don't work at the college any longer, but I believe they will renew the license for the OU Campus Content Management System because of all the great benefits they have had since they initially deployed it. The system is very intuitive and easy to use. Department leads love it. The IT department also loves it because it saves them a lot of time and resources.
Each of the options had good points and bad points. Building a site with tight integration to HCL Commerce and SAP backend systems was just easier with HCL DX. Security is also a concern and HCL DX provided better fine-grained security across the board. HCL DX also allowed us to use multiple technologies and maintain a cohesive feel across everything.
Unique, easy and user friendly solution that has increased business benefits such as a single repository for all company's products. It provides a better customer service.
A huge network of offices managed centrally increasing SEO, marketing, business and clients.
Employee efficiency reducing time through a single automated solution.
Internal communication within the company has been helped by Web Content Manager as a way of transparency, shared repository and networking with the goal of bringing teams and colleagues together.
Increased satisfaction with user experience. OU Campus has made it easier for us to address problems when they arise, making our website more efficient.
Role-based control. Our old CMS made it very easy for users to change fonts and colors on their sections, which was very detrimental to the overall brand. That's not a problem anymore.
Reduced training times. OU Campus is so easy to use, I've been able to cut training times down by half.