HCSS is a construction software suite. It includes functionality for bidding, time card and project management, safety, planning, scheduling, equipment management, and data warehousing and reporting. Each module can be purchased separately. The suite can be hosted in the cloud.
N/A
IFS Applications
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Pricing
HCSS
IFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HCSS
IFS Applications
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HCSS
IFS Applications
Features
HCSS
IFS Applications
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
5.1
34 Ratings
37% below category average
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
5.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
5.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
5.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
5.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
6.031 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
5.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
5.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
7.029 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.4
3 Ratings
50% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
6.83 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
5.83 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
16% above category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.75 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.5
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.15 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.0
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
9.15 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.1
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
8.85 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
7.95 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
7.94 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.64 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
8.64 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.64 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.4
2 Ratings
24% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
9.42 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
9.13 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
7.24 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.5
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.12 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
8.72 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
7.72 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
7.23 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
9.13 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.44 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
HCSS
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
22% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
9.44 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Our operation uses several pieces of what we call specialty equipment (not used every day on every job). The foreman when finished will give a location of where this equipment is left, this many times can be very vague and lead to a lowboy driver trying to block around to find the piece or driving down a street he cannot get turned around in. With the GPS devices, the driver can pinpoint exactly where the unit is and if he has room to turn around at that location.
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
#1 is support! HCSS is by far the best software support of any product we have ever used. Unlike most software companies HCSS utilizes their support calls to help upgrade their software. When you here them tell you that they will write down a particular issue you come across during a support call if they can't help you then and there they will research and get an answer to you extremely fast. If the software will not do it, you can bet there is a good chance it will be on the list of enhancements you will see come out in the near future.
Estimating software is very extensive. Their software is capable of handling the smallest estimate all the way to the largest joint venture estimate. It has advanced features that make it extremely useful for analyzing job materials, subcontractors etc.
HeavyJob is an extremely useful tool for the field to keep the office up to date with job costs. Everything is at the Foreman's fingertips on Tablets to allow the information from the field to get uploaded to HeavyJob manager which then can export to accounting. We are also able to give our Foreman the ability to deal with the Daily and weekly safety needs (Tailgate Meetings, incident Investigation, observations etc.) right on the Tablets thru HeavyJob.
All their apps are on mobile devices. Although there is not a clear company policy on Android versus iPhone. Updates for features lag behind on Android. Some apps are exclusive to one platform making it hard to fully interconnect all programs.
As mentioned, user interface appears messy and complicated at initial onset. Training is necessary but becomes easy to maneuver through after solid daily use.
I have never had a bad experience or heard of one in 4 years of doing business with HCSS. That is unheard of even with the hurricanes and flooding in Houston area it feels like HCSS was always there and willing to help in every way.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
I was not employed with PPI upon implementation. I would prefer to reference my previous statement, that each company needs to evaluate its culture and address your implementation accordingly. The purchasing company should assign an employee as point person and really take charge of not just the technical side of the implementation (HCSS pretty much handles that), but focus on company culture and training.
Other estimating products I have used consist of ICE/MC2 and MS Excel. ICE was not a good fit for our company, as they have awful technical support and offer very poor training. MS Excel is great for simple estimates where there is not a lot of data being compiled. However neither hold a candle to the power of HCSS Heavybid
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Because of the codebooks (bid item codebook for DOT's specifically), we're able to carve off significant time in "stick-building" estimates
It's very easy to train newer estimators with HeavyBid due to the abundance of resources available on HCSS Academy and elsewhere (i.e. Arthur Nix's material)
The KPI's and Insights that Pre-Con offers helps us to make better decisions on Bid Day.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.