Hippo CMMS vs. Primavera Unifier

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hippo CMMS
Score 2.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…
$35
per month per user
Primavera Unifier
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Facilities Asset Management Software Oracle Primavera Unifier aims to drive best practices that increase visibility and efficiency, allowing users to leverage extensive configurability along with prebuilt processes to automate any business process with custom forms and workflows. Key Benefits: - Configurability and governance—automate any process, from simple to complex, with total control and data ownership - Cloud or on-premise deployment - A comprehensive…N/A
Pricing
Hippo CMMSPrimavera Unifier
Editions & Modules
Hippo Starter
$35
per month per user
Hippo Plus
$55
per month per user
Hippo Pro
$75
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hippo CMMSPrimavera Unifier
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$600 Single UserNo setup fee
Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hippo CMMSPrimavera Unifier
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Hippo CMMSPrimavera Unifier
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Hippo CMMSPrimavera Unifier
Likelihood to Recommend
2.2
(8 ratings)
8.5
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Hippo CMMSPrimavera Unifier
Likelihood to Recommend
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
Read full review
Oracle
Well suited: Used for construction domain for management of multiple vendors and sites. Used in cost management in energy domain company Not suited for: Partner users- once the company is inactive, all users will be inactive.
Read full review
Pros
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Simple to use Work requester.
  • Great customer service and support.
  • Not filled with non-essential items like a lot of "Larger" company CMMS systems
Read full review
Oracle
  • Submittals
  • RFI's
  • Change Management
Read full review
Cons
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Completed work order reporting can be improved. It seems harder than it should be to get the data I need.
  • I would like to streamline the work order closing procedure. I feel like it takes longer than it should to open various screens and add labor, mark tasks complete, change status, etc. It is a minor inconvenience, but just waiting a few seconds opening up a new window is time-consuming with many WO at a time.
  • Labor tracking and reporting could be improved.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Allowing to hyperlink within Unifier.
  • Ability to paste from Excel into Unifier.
  • The need for a modern design look and feel.
Read full review
Support Rating
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I've used Hippo for several years now. I'm sure other programs have been developed since I did my comparison testing. But Hippo has always done everything we needed it to do. It's very reliable. My guys don't doubt whether or not it's doing its job. The calendar view, ease of use and floor mapping set this program apart from others.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their task.
Read full review
Oracle
It is more user friendly , easy in cost management, good for integrating with multiple tools as data sources
Read full review
Return on Investment
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Allows tracking something that we did not have before
  • Decision making is now with hard data
  • Replacement and repair cost have been reduced with tracking of maintenance.
Read full review
Oracle
  • In my organization, multiple companies like Metrolinx are using, and business is increasing day by day.
  • Energy domain company like GE wind is using it now to manage their new project in sea wind installation.
  • Used BI reports user defined reports, and custom reports to get data from multiple sources.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Hippo CMMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Primavera Unifier Screenshots

Screenshot of Cash Flow ManagementScreenshot of Project Cost ControlScreenshot of Contract ManagementScreenshot of Earned Value ManagementScreenshot of Fund ManagementScreenshot of Maintenance Management