Hornetsecurity VM Backup vs. OpenText Availability

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Hornetsecurity VM Backup (formerly Altaro) is a backup and replication solution for Hyper-V and VMware virtual machines. VM Backup can manage large infrastructures, with the revamped backup repository providing long-term storage and more efficient use of disk space.
$59.80
per VM/per year
OpenText Availability
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Carbonite acquired Double-Take, a data replication and disaster recovery option, in early 2017. The technology now powers OpenText Availability, the high availability and data replication product.N/A
Pricing
Hornetsecurity VM BackupOpenText Availability
Editions & Modules
Subscription License - Standard Edition
$59.80
per VM/per year
Subscription License - Unlimited Edition
$73.80
per VM/per year
Subscription License - Unlimited Plus Edition
$89.20
per VM/per year
Perpetual License - Standard Edition
$595
per host
Perpetual License - Unlimited Edition
$695
per host
Perpetual License - Unlimited Plus Edition
$875
per host
Free
Free
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hornetsecurity VM BackupOpenText Availability
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hornetsecurity VM BackupOpenText Availability
Considered Both Products
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Each of the products got its own strengths. For me, it is all about the customer, and about their requirements. Altaro is very good software, and I can get protected what I need to for our customers, and that is the most important part.
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
I have not previously used any other VM backup solution prior to testing Altaro VM Backup.
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
The only other competitor I am personally familiar with is Carbonite. I use that for file-level backups throughout my network and it works well but while it does offer backups for virtual machines, I have never found it to be a reliable option. Jobs failed for me regularly for …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
While there are other solutions on the market, we have stuck with Altaro because it is such a great value for the dollar.
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
When we have looked for a VM backup solution we've tried some other competitors, even to backup just data and not all VM. We've tested Acronis backup that is a complete solution but more expensive and more complicated, we've also tried Nakivo but didn't convince us the …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
We backup all VMs with both Altaro and Arcserve. Altaro is very powerful when it's time to back up and restore, but gets corrupted too often. Arcserve assures that we always have a safe copy of the VMs, but the backup and restore process is very slow. Can take days to restore a …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
  • Veeam seems like another excellent backup solution, and appears to have many similar features to Altaro VM Backup but also seemed more complicated to set up when I tried 5+ years ago.
  • Also, at the time, Veeam's licensing was very confusing where you needed to count CPU's on the …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Altaro brings value to organizations looking at other platforms. It's definitely less expensive overall than Veeam, Datto or Infrascale. The recovery solution for Altaro is very good and reliable. Any organization looking at Veeam should consider Altaro as a potential …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Lower cost, same reliability, 24 hour support
OpenText Availability
Chose OpenText Availability
Carbonite Availability does an outstanding job competing against competitors like Druva and Veeam. It provides useful tools that every organization needs in this day and age. Companies will rely on Carbonite Availability more and more as IT organizations become ever more …
Chose OpenText Availability

Zerto is a very nice tool when performing virtual to virtual replication. If you were to add a physical server in the mix, it would not be able to handle that server or the data on it.

Veeam is a way is similar to Zerto where it only has the ability to handle virtual to virtual …

Chose OpenText Availability
It's a cost effective solution for our smaller clients. However since doubletake is quite different from RecoverPoint. I can't do an apples to apples comparison.
Chose OpenText Availability
It is better for critical apps than Veeam due to the lower RPO. Veeam is favoured by some customers due to it's attractive price point.

Zerto is a very strong product and is innovating continuously. I don't see so much of this from DoubleTake.
Chose OpenText Availability
I was not involved in the initial review of DT so I have nothing to compare too.
Chose OpenText Availability
I'm not sure anyone else out there can provide what Doubletake has. [It's] Unique software that did exactly what we needed it to do.
Chose OpenText Availability
DoubleTake was recommended by our VisionSolutions partner, because we already using Mimix.
Features
Hornetsecurity VM BackupOpenText Availability
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
9.5
Ratings
10% above category average
OpenText Availability
-
Ratings
Universal recovery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant recovery8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Recovery verification10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business application protection8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Snapshots7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management dashboard10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform support10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
9.0
Ratings
5% above category average
OpenText Availability
-
Ratings
Continuous data protection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Replication10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware protection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Hornetsecurity VM BackupOpenText Availability
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cohesity Data Cloud
Cohesity Data Cloud
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cohesity Data Cloud
Cohesity Data Cloud
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Hornetsecurity VM BackupOpenText Availability
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Hornetsecurity VM BackupOpenText Availability
Likelihood to Recommend
Altaro VM Backup is great if you have 1 or 2 VMs that aren't backed up by any other means. I initially had some issues with setting it up so it backed up to a NAS, and sometimes the host wouldn't sync to the client. There probably wouldn't be an issue if the host system is the backup location. The interface and configuration were pretty intuitive and gave you a lot of information on the status of your backups.
Read full review
I believe it would work well with continuous replication in a DR scenario with no time limits and having the ability to fail back is a bonus, but in a one off move the decision to restrict the time it can sync for has proven to be an issue for us.
Read full review
Pros
  • Fast and simple setup. I didn't need to read through ANY documentation to set up and have a backup running.
  • Easy and cost-effective licensing. I didn't need to count CPU's or VM's or other random facts to work out my licensing. Just how many hosts, and then one of 3 feature levels of which two have unlimited VM licensing. Hosts x Feature Set = Cost.
  • Easy Restores. Backing up is one thing, but restoring and having confidence in the restore is another. It just works, simple and effective.
  • Help is easy to find if you need it. From within the app, it gives you options of email, phone, and live chat, which is usually available even with odd time zones in play.
Read full review
  • Allows for easy review and updating during replication processes. The Portal is user-friendly and very accessible with little user training.
  • Allows us to know when we have errors in replication and actions needed.
  • Their support is very quick and reliable in the event we have questions or issue.
Read full review
Cons
  • More cloud-based storage options. Currently, only Azure is supported, which is excellent, but it would be good to have AWS and Google storage options too.
  • It would be AWESOME if they could do a restore from Azure cloud direct to an Azure VM instance. Currently, you need to set up an Azure VM machine with nested Hyper-V, install Altaro on that, and then restore into a nested VM, this gets crazy expensive.
  • Better notification of errors, or more around having a threshold, so if it misses one backup of a constant backup that happens every 5 minutes but recovers at the 10 minutes back, it is ok. Just think it needs to identify significant or long-running issues better than the occasional little issues.
Read full review
  • License management is poor and the online system is very restrictive, We are using a one time "Move" product that has a fixed life ... but sometimes in a small team other high priority tasks come along.
  • We lost all access to all licenses in the portal and all support because we hadn't used them in ninety days. Very poor service. We did get access back eventually but it took a lot of "bargaining".
  • Failover isn't always as smooth as it could be. VMDKs don't release properly and the move fails and has to be done manually. Not hard just frustrating. VMWare to VMWare.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It simply works and it is making our lives easier. The renewal process is also really good
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
A lot of people in the technical industry deliver what I would call snack crackle pop topics, where the software gets over complicated, and they drown people in all the "fancy" features. Altaro, from my point of view" has designed the software to be super usable, easy to implement, as well as support. It is really one of the best designs
Read full review
Cabonite Availability is a very practical and useful tool that can help any business weather any type of IT disaster. The ease and quickness of restoring data helps us provide as seamless an experience as possible. Many times our customers will never know there was an outage. This brings confidence in our brand and improves our organization's standing and reputation.
Read full review
Support Rating
One of the most important benefits of the Altaro HyperV backup solution is the support. From the free edition, you're able to chat with the support that can assist you in a remote session an find a quick solution that solves the issue. It is always available. The email support is also.
Read full review
Once through to support it is very good and they have assisted us through a number of issues. I don't always think that they provide a solution, more a workaround, but in a move situation where each copy is moving once, that isn't an issue. I'd be more concerned if we were using it to manage a DR scenario.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Altaro has really designed their product so well that you can honestly implement this within a couple of minutes
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The only other competitor I am personally familiar with is Carbonite. I use that for file-level backups throughout my network and it works well but while it does offer backups for virtual machines, I have never found it to be a reliable option. Jobs failed for me regularly for no apparent reason. In the handful of times I have needed support, they were helpful and straight-forward.
Read full review
Zerto is a very nice tool when performing virtual to virtual replication. If you were to add a physical server in the mix, it would not be able to handle that server or the data on it. Veeam is a way is similar to Zerto where it only has the ability to handle virtual to virtual replication. The big difference is that it's not continuous replication. It uses a snapshot technology to grab the changes from the last snapshot and replicate that over.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Restoring our primary ERP VM has already saved many hours of rebuilding from data backups, so that in itself already gave us an excellent ROI for having Altaro running.
  • The quick and easy setup also makes sense for a fast ROI as we didn't need to spend much time or effort in its set up.
  • Lastly, any other restores we have done for retrieving files or testing backups were so simple and easy to do that the process didn't take long and saved us time and cost.
Read full review
  • It has helped us to service our customers
  • It has helped us provide tools for re-sellers
  • It has allowed our customers to keep their critical apps running in the event of a disaster
Read full review
ScreenShots