ibi WebFOCUS vs. IBM Planning Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ibi WebFOCUS
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
The ibi™ WebFOCUS® product is an enterprise business intelligence and analytics solution equipped with data management, visual discovery, predictive analytics, and visualizations. Combining these capabilities and data science in one unified containerized platform, the WebFOCUS® solution can be used to make data-driven decisions across the enterprise and provide reports, dashboards, and customer-facing applications at scale.N/A
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Pricing
ibi WebFOCUSIBM Planning Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ibi WebFOCUSIBM Planning Analytics
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ibi WebFOCUSIBM Planning Analytics
Features
ibi WebFOCUSIBM Planning Analytics
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
7.7
11 Ratings
6% below category average
IBM Planning Analytics
7.5
107 Ratings
0% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.06 Ratings7.494 Ratings
Customizable dashboards9.011 Ratings7.4107 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.011 Ratings7.8101 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
9.3
13 Ratings
15% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
7.6
113 Ratings
3% below category average
Drill-down analysis8.013 Ratings7.9110 Ratings
Formatting capabilities10.013 Ratings7.4111 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages9.08 Ratings7.485 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration10.012 Ratings7.8109 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
8.2
11 Ratings
0% below category average
IBM Planning Analytics
8.0
107 Ratings
0% below category average
Publish to Web10.09 Ratings7.9101 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.09 Ratings7.9100 Ratings
Report Versioning6.010 Ratings8.398 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling10.011 Ratings7.991 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
6.3
10 Ratings
24% below category average
IBM Planning Analytics
7.3
108 Ratings
1% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)6.08 Ratings7.8108 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.09 Ratings6.9101 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.07 Ratings7.898 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings6.831 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
9.0
11 Ratings
6% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
7.9
113 Ratings
7% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)8.011 Ratings7.9111 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model10.011 Ratings7.5112 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)10.011 Ratings8.0113 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.04 Ratings8.4105 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings7.540 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
5.9
11 Ratings
27% below category average
IBM Planning Analytics
7.1
99 Ratings
5% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access9.011 Ratings7.596 Ratings
Mobile Application3.32 Ratings6.761 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.08 Ratings6.071 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
8.6
3 Ratings
11% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
-
Ratings
REST API10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
122 Ratings
6% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings8.3118 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.6121 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings9.2121 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings8.9120 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings8.3121 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
113 Ratings
8% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings9.2109 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings9.2101 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings8.2102 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.2100 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings8.893 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings7.3105 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings7.9107 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
114 Ratings
7% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings8.0110 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.6111 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.3113 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings9.2103 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings6.975 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
116 Ratings
2% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.9115 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings7.9110 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings8.2113 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings8.0111 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.3111 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.382 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
ibi WebFOCUS
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
114 Ratings
6% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings8.4111 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings8.9112 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings8.8103 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ibi WebFOCUSIBM Planning Analytics
Small Businesses
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ibi WebFOCUSIBM Planning Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(16 ratings)
8.0
(121 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(5 ratings)
9.1
(5 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(3 ratings)
7.8
(69 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(3 ratings)
7.4
(93 ratings)
Online Training
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ibi WebFOCUSIBM Planning Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
IBI (Information Builders)
I would less recommend it because it looks like IBI is receding a bit from the European market. I would not be certain for future support. Knowledge in the market in western Europe is limited Functional wise the application suits almost all situations. I would for sure recommend it purely based on its capabilities
Read full review
IBM
Very powerful modeling capabilities. It has a really good OLAP engine memory. Strong scenario planning for what if analysis. Flexibility of integration with ERPs or WM systems for both cloud and on premises. Centralized planning and alignment of governance is also a plus. Having one single system for many different functions.
Read full review
Pros
IBI (Information Builders)
  • One thing that has always been good at WebFOCUS is how they interact with the customer on items. They take suggestions and implement them. In addition technical support is timely and very detailed.
  • I think they keep up with and lead in implementing new technologies in the BI space. One case of this are the ability for user to create their own easy dashboard using the green plus buttons. Also the ability to link d3 into and have the ability to implement new types of graphs is nice.
  • I have been to a spoke at one of their user conferences and they are worth going to. In addition to all of the great seminars the interaction you get with vendors and other users is key in the growth of your knowledge. I've learned so much for my time at these conferences.
Read full review
IBM
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
Cons
IBI (Information Builders)
  • The newest versions of WebFOCUS have an unnecessarily complicated security layout that makes configuration difficult to accomplish without bringing in the vendor for installs.
  • This software tries to cover too many bases allowing you to switch from writing code manually to creating reports using only GUI tools. This sometimes complicates screens and functionality where the two methods don't always work well together. -though its nice to have the choice.
  • The sales force is not as top notch as many software companies
Read full review
IBM
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBI (Information Builders)
This software is deeply engrained with my organization and has become a tool that would not easily be replaced without spending more money and resources to get the same results. License cost is comparable to other report writing tools and the capabilities are greater than the competition without having to buy multiple apps to do the same thing.
Read full review
IBM
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Usability
IBI (Information Builders)
Best BI tool/product I have used. The others don't compare overall. Some can look fancier, but when you actually use them with large data and data from numerous systems/sources that is where most of the competition falls away. I also don't like downtime. I have basically none for a large user base with WebFocus. Even SAP Crystal Reports went down for 4 days once - 4 days because the admin password got locked out due to a glitch and we had zero reports for 4 days. WebFocus has never had more than a few minutes of downtime. It's like a tank that just keeps rolling. There is no other choice for reliable BI.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBI (Information Builders)
Tracking availability formally for almost two years and we are at 99.8%
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBI (Information Builders)
They have extremely knowledgeable techs that I have worked with over the years. Some have actually become really good friends of mine. I see them often at local user groups and when we show them how we are using their tools to save millions of dollars throughout the company
Read full review
IBM
IBM support has been very quick to respond and handle the very few issues we've had. We've had a third-party who partners with IBM to be our consulting team which has helped greatly reduce the need for us to contact IBM directly. I highly recommend researching and selecting a well-respected partner to help with an implementation as well as ongoing support as needed.
Read full review
Online Training
IBI (Information Builders)
It's hit and miss, the last class was overcrowded and people were having trouble connecting which took up much of the time. Instructors vary
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBI (Information Builders)
Plan ahead on what data will be accessible and the type of security required on the database and if you will want to use security that is built into the software. It is worth consulting with the vendor on what your plan is and how they recommend you proceed in order to get results you are happy with.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBI (Information Builders)
Webfocus handles the side of our business that is involved with our catalogs. Our catalogs is a huge revenue driver for us and this tool has been extremely useful with planning feature catalogs. Tableau is used more for marketing and merchandising purchases since we can filter data based on website sales.
Read full review
IBM
As it is related to MS Excel, IBM Planning Analytics is a much more robust and complete solution for the CFO or COO in mind. Oracle Hyperion stacks up nicely against IBM Planning Analytics. However, IBM's investment in AI allows Planning Analytics users more options and speed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBI (Information Builders)
  • We are not yet a success story. Though we've been implementing WebFOCUS for over a year, we have very few products in our Production portal. Of course, this is not all the responsibility of Information Builders, but we were ill-advised by our 'training coordinator' in our training of staff and coming up to speed with the tools has been very slow.
  • Once skilled analysts and professional IT staff achieve a grasp of the products, they are able to very quickly create polished and well-received products.
  • The DW/BI project has helped us to establish standards and protocols of communication that will allow us to more quickly meet knowledge transfer requirements
Read full review
IBM
  • Automate direct data connections to multiple data sources
  • One secured version of the the truth (for data and formulas)
  • Ability to scale to much more detailed planning with option to create predictive forecasts at detail
  • Business user friendly with powerful Excel integration
  • Very flexible and powerful modeling, can handle custom modeling needs at scale
  • Can make the same data available across finance and ops, but at the level of details and timeline that makes sense for them
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis