IBM Analytics Engine vs. Jaspersoft vs. Orbit Reporting and Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM BigInsights is an analytics and data visualization tool leveraging hadoop.N/A
Jaspersoft
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Jaspersoft commercial edition is an embedded business intelligence suite designed to be built-into SaaS products as an integrated reporting engine. It provides reports and dashboards for customer-facing applications without requiring app developers to build their own reporting engine.N/A
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Orbit Reporting + Analytics is a self-service reporting and BI solution for all ERP, Custom and Cloud applications from the company of the same name in Alpharetta. Orbit integrates with ERP and key business applications, providing access to real-time data from all data sources -- empowering business users to build interactive reports, charts, and dashboards.N/A
Pricing
IBM Analytics EngineJaspersoftOrbit Reporting and Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Analytics EngineJaspersoftOrbit Reporting and Analytics
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsJaspersoft offers flexible pricing for ISVs and SaaS per customer or by CPU core.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Analytics EngineJaspersoftOrbit Reporting and Analytics
Considered Multiple Products
IBM Analytics Engine
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
We have tried the following solutions in the past and I must say they can't compare to IBM Analytics Engine:

Chose IBM Analytics Engine
Our data analytics team happened to try IBM Analytics just to get acquainted with it & it turned out that this tool fits our business requirement better than the one which we were using in terms of the features along with the level of support that they provide. so, choosing the …
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics is a great tool and a welcome addition to your overall IBM strategy. I think in cases of tools like this, you either go with what your platform works best with or you go completely different with a 3rd party, like Snowflake. We are an Azure shop and just happened …
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
We initially wanted to go with Google BigQuery, mainly for the name recognition. However, the pricing and support structure led us to seek alternatives, which pointed us to IBM. Apache Spark was also in the running, but here IBM's domination in the industry made the choice a …
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
We did an evaluation of Google Analytics and Microsoft Azure Stream Analytics in comparison to the IBM Analytics Engine product. We choose the product offering from IBM because we felt that for our company, this product offered a more complete and comprehensive package to …
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
Hortonworks Data Platform, Apache Spark, Tableau Desktop and Tableau Online
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
  • I have been using Azure for my previous analysis, I had a difficult time in understanding the Analytics engine rather IBM provided step by step tutorial for setup.
  • Also turning off a machine was not an option in Azure for some of the services so I had to pay for the service …
Chose IBM Analytics Engine
Our professor has worked with IBM And many major tech companies. He’d recommend us which tools to use. And comparing to Azure, IBM is more convenient to use.
Jaspersoft
Chose Jaspersoft
TIBCO does a better job in providing seamless data mapping and migration from one legacy system to other without any loss of traffic or compromising the security of the data. Whereas with another tool sometimes because of the integral framework there may be some questions as to …
Chose Jaspersoft
Much easier to use for the first time. Better collaboration. Sharing the dashboard to the web was easier.
Chose Jaspersoft
The community Edison allowed us to use the product enough without licensing restrictions until we moved to enterprise edition.
Chose Jaspersoft
Very cost-effective and was easy to work with. However as I’ve said before, when your data volumes grow significantly over the years it’s important to plan what your needs will be. Twice in my career, we chose Jaspersoft Enterprise Edition and both times outgrew it in under 6 …
Chose Jaspersoft
We evaluated Burst which was very nice but the pricing wasn't in our budget. They actually provided the data warehouse whereas Jaspersoft does not.
Chose Jaspersoft
Power BI has a more user-friendly UI and tools but is hard to integrate with our application. Qlik Sense is default vendor for our organization in some countries.
Chose Jaspersoft
We selected it for multi-tenancy, low maintenance, and server options.
Chose Jaspersoft
Price was a big factor. Jaspersoft is well priced compared to Tableau. We found Glow scaled badly. With Jaspersoft, we can add as much horsepower as we need.
Chose Jaspersoft
I was not involved in the selection and purchasing process.
Chose Jaspersoft
As I believe Business Objects was no longer being supported, we moved onto using TIBCO Jaspersoft. We have used Jaspersoft to create new reports, as well as, convert existing reports from different platforms, such as BO. We selected Jaspersoft as it seemed like a good fit that …
Chose Jaspersoft
Facility in Data integration was one of the main reasons to choose TIBCO Jaspersoft. Besides the multi-dimension in analytics.
Chose Jaspersoft
When looking at the different features of these reporting engines, and what we were going to be using it for, the answer seemed clear. Jasper offered exactly what we were looking for, and did so for a price that we were happy with. For a scalable, feature-rich reporting engine …
Chose Jaspersoft
It's been a long time since we have been using Jasper, so I can't really remember the details, but mainly it was about comparing how easy it was to integrate with our Java-based product, reporting capability, and datasources/platform supported.
Chose Jaspersoft
We used Business Objects for reporting, but the licensing exceeded our budget so we had to look for other reporting server options. We used the community version of the reports server for some time with no problems, just limitations on what we could/couldn't do. We were very …
Chose Jaspersoft
The support and chances of implementing the own branding, as we ship TIBCO Jaspersoft as a stand-alone server we did our own branding for the Jasper server with the login page and the theme, hiding the unnecessary options to the user. The ease of creating canned reports using …
Chose Jaspersoft
More flexible than Qlik, easier to integrate and cheaper to run.
Less polished and ultimately capable than Tableau, but more flexible commercially and technically.
In terms of commercials and support, easier to deal with than either Qlik or Tableau.
Chose Jaspersoft
Tibco Jaspersoft is a stronger competitor than the Microsoft Reports and ETL products. The flexibility and power of using the software, multi platform and deployment and monitoring has no comparison to what you use.

It would be interesting to integrate some features of …
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
Chose Orbit Reporting and Analytics
It provides a wide range of functionalities that are absent in the other platform. There are a large number of customizable services offered. It is very user-friendly and output-driven which makes it easier to interpret. It also supports ad-hoc reporting and data stories in an …
Features
IBM Analytics EngineJaspersoftOrbit Reporting and Analytics
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
7.6
Ratings
7% below category average
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
5.7
Ratings
36% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings7.60 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings7.50 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.80 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
6.5
Ratings
21% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings7.20 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.30 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.70 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
7.7
Ratings
6% below category average
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
6.0
Ratings
31% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings7.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.70 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.70 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.50 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings7.50 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
6.7
Ratings
17% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings7.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
8.1
Ratings
5% below category average
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
5.8
Ratings
38% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.10 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.50 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings7.70 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
7.0
Ratings
10% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings7.90 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings5.50 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings8.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
IBM Analytics Engine
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
6.0
Ratings
25% below category average
REST API00 Ratings7.90 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings7.70 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings8.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings6.50 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings7.70 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Analytics EngineJaspersoftOrbit Reporting and Analytics
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.6 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudera Manager
Cloudera Manager
Score 9.9 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Score 8.9 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Analytics EngineJaspersoftOrbit Reporting and Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Analytics EngineJaspersoftOrbit Reporting and Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
We are at present utilizing IBM Analytics Engine and it works incredible. Following are the things that I like the most about this product is:- - Simple to Utilize - Reasonable Cost - With only a couple seconds you can ready to fabricate and convey groups - you can without much of a stretch break down information through different applications
Read full review
TIBCO Jaspersoft is well suited for users who are not too technical. These users are able to easily drag and drop domain fields from their database to create friendly table reports. Users can easily add filters to their reports which allows for reusability. On the other hand, if a user is looking to add information that has many-to-many relationships, duplicates will appear. Having duplicates in an ad-hoc view and not being able to easily remove them is a big issue for many of our clients.
Read full review
It has been very useful in a wider variety of different scenarios within our organization, I could not be more pleased with my experience. It is appropriate for business decision makers who really need analytics to influence what they do day to day. I would say that ORBIT probably is not as useful for developers, but there are other software solutions out there that provide information that is more useful.
Read full review
Pros
  • We are able to build and deploy clusters within minutes to simplify user experience and increase scalability and reliability.
  • We are able to scale and compute on-demand to handle newer workloads like machine learning.
  • We really like that we are able to access and administer the application via multiple interfaces.
Read full review
  • Jaspersoft has an excellent self-service module that allows ad hoc report creation and can be easily worked by non-technical users as well.
  • Using this tool, it doesn't matter if you are viewing the report on a desktop screen or smaller mobile screens, the experience is seamless.
Read full review
  • User-Friendly
  • Results-Driven
  • Aesthetically Pleasing
Read full review
Cons
  • I would like to see a more robust version of their online help
  • The speed of their business support is adequate, but I kind of expect more from such a powerhouse.
  • Problems with duration of cluster life
Read full review
  • The UI on the report designer, Jaspersoft Studio, looks a little outdated. I think that Studio as a whole could use a facelift. Additionally, Jaspersoft Studio tends to slow down over time, requiring a restart of the program.
  • There is a bit of a learning curve with all of the intricacies of Jaspersoft Studio, it's kind of overwhelming when trying to learn it from nothing.
  • One functionality that seems to be missing, that would help our use-case, would be the ability to parameterize a JSON URL as a data source. For example, if there was a call to a set of JSON data, it has to be a static URL. But in many cases, APIs that return JSON take parameters via the URL. Jaspersoft does not support that.
Read full review
  • Sometimes it becomes difficult as to how to go about a particular function
  • Lagging
  • Unclear User Interface
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We've converted our library of reports to use Jaspersoft. Our clients have had a taste of Jaspersoft and we've had very positive feedback from those interactions. Our internal employees have had great success using iReports and JasperStudio to create very robust reports that better show the data our clients expect to see. Overall, our experiences with Jaspersoft have been great and it's proven to be a very good decision for the direction of our business.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
I think it's a tool well suited for a software developer. Others with less coding skills could struggle somewhat with the tool. I find java a little unforgiving as a language for expressions and not very user friendly for the technically dis-inclined. Sometimes the numeric conversions cause issues (who knew that 0 and 0.0 would cause different things to happen). Previous experience with a reporting tool that used visual basic for its' expressions that I found much simpler to use. On the other hand, java is so widespread, you can easily google the syntax to accomplish what you need to do.
Read full review
ORBIT is so incredibly user-friendly. It makes things so much easier and it makes them go so much quicker.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
There have been a few instances where Tomcat has consumed 100% CPU, which requires a restart to resolve, but other than that reliability has been excellent.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
No answers on this topic
Complex reports on heavy data load may take considerable amount of time. We have experinced some latencies/misfires regarding to this.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
They have a great customer support ticketing system in which they always respond same-day. They offer conference calls with srcreensharing as well in order to better understand your issues.
I wish that the lower level support access came with more than just 12 cases per year though as this makes us less likely to reach out for questions on things that we then instead try to solve ourselves which results in loss of time in trying to acquire new features and or solve a problem.
Read full review
I never had a chance to work with the support team for Orbit Reporting and Analytics, hence cannot really comment here.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
It did the job of getting us to our deadline we set for ourselves for initial launch. The customer we launched the product for was also there to learn about it at the same in order to better understand the capabilities. This helped greatly so that the customer was on the same page on what was possible when using jaspersoft. I think most people would not want their customers aware the product they are using is third-party but in this case it was a new experience for us both and so as we learned more about jaspersoft, we both had better communication on what the future road map was for their business needs in BI.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Resources available in the TIBCO Knowledge Base are covering almost everything. They are well organized, and covering almost every possibility. There is always the change to get back to the TIBCO support or to the dedicated Customer Success Manager whenever something very specific or bound to a customization is not covered.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Super easy to install and/or upgrade! For all the big name software out there that does some business critical things, Jasper is a pleasure to install and/or upgrade. The bundled installer is all ONE install (one shell script execution at least) that sets up everything. Vastly superior to most other software of this caliber.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
  • I have been using Azure for my previous analysis, I had a difficult time in understanding the Analytics engine rather IBM provided step by step tutorial for setup.
  • Also turning off a machine was not an option in Azure for some of the services so I had to pay for the service whether I use it or not
Read full review
TIBCO does a better job in providing seamless data mapping and migration from one legacy system to other without any loss of traffic or compromising the security of the data. Whereas with another tool sometimes because of the integral framework there may be some questions as to why the data packets were lost during mapping and migration.
Read full review
It provides a wide range of functionalities that are absent in the other platform. There are a large number of customizable services offered. It is very user-friendly and output-driven which makes it easier to interpret. It also supports ad-hoc reporting and data stories in an easier manner and format which makes it easier to use for users who are just beginners.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We haven't really started to explore the scalability of the product as yet, but in terms of existing deployments it has done what we need it to do.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It has saved us quite a bit of time managing our catalog of clusters and keeping things organized.
  • Since we had a division we acquired running IBM Cloud, it was easy to get it running and try it out, but we found we prefer our Azure configuration better simply to keep our technology in alignment across corporate functions.
  • I definitely see some cost savings by separating out the storage and compute. It helps you start to put an appropriate price tag on certain instances of big data.
Read full review
  • I used the free version, so obviously the positive side is we did not have to pay
  • Next advantage is you can pick it up relatively fast, even though I think the UI can be much improved. Otherwise creating PDF reports by programming is quite a complicate task, to me anyway
Read full review
  • Good reporting
  • Better Analytics
  • Enhanced decision making abilities
Read full review
ScreenShots

Jaspersoft Screenshots

Screenshot of Report DesignScreenshot of Ad-hoc ReportingScreenshot of Mobile ReportingScreenshot of Dashboard