IBM API Connect vs. Informatica Cloud API & App Integration vs. Microsoft BizTalk Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM API Connect
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM API Connect is a scalable API solution that helps organizations implement a robust API strategy by creating, exposing, managing and monetizing an entire API ecosystem across multiple clouds. As businesses embrace their digital transformation journey, APIs become critical to unlock the value of business data and assets. With increasing adoption of APIs, consistency and governance are needed across the enterprise. API Connect aims to help businesses…
$83
per month
Informatica Cloud API & App Integration
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Informatica Cloud API & App Integration is a cloud-based service used to manage APIs for enterprise services and processes. It can also be used to create and manage custom APIs.N/A
Microsoft BizTalk
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
IBM API ConnectInformatica Cloud API & App IntegrationMicrosoft BizTalk Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM API ConnectInformatica Cloud API & App IntegrationMicrosoft BizTalk
Free Trial
YesYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM API ConnectInformatica Cloud API & App IntegrationMicrosoft BizTalk Server
Features
IBM API ConnectInformatica Cloud API & App IntegrationMicrosoft BizTalk Server
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM API Connect
8.4
57 Ratings
0% below category average
Informatica Cloud API & App Integration
-
Ratings
Microsoft BizTalk Server
-
Ratings
API access control8.957 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies8.852 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API usage data8.755 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API user onboarding8.656 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API versioning8.356 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Usage billing and payments7.645 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging8.256 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM API ConnectInformatica Cloud API & App IntegrationMicrosoft BizTalk Server
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
Boomi
Boomi
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM API ConnectInformatica Cloud API & App IntegrationMicrosoft BizTalk Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(50 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(43 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM API ConnectInformatica Cloud API & App IntegrationMicrosoft BizTalk Server
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Based on our experience, IBM API Connect clearly excels in large enterprises navigating complex B2B ecosystems, especially within the Fintech and Banking sectors. Its capabilities are particularly valuable for achieving Open Banking compliance, facilitating the monetization of data and services, and seamlessly operating in hybrid cloud environments. However, it's crucial to understand that IBM API Connect primarily functions as an API management and orchestration tool. This means that backend integrations with providers like databases are best handled by dedicated integration middleware, such as IBM App Connect, allowing API Connect to then securely and efficiently expose those functionalities to external entities.
Read full review
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
BizTalk is well suited as middleware. Where you wish to translate an input file into an output file and send it to some endpoint. In our case, we used it to convert and send files to SAP. In many ways, it very flexible, and you can do almost anything you want with it. In many ways, it's a better solution than your SAP XI or PI as middleware, since it's much less expensive, and allows you do interface with non-SAP systems.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • API discovery feature is very helpful to allow us to scope the work required before diving into things.
  • The ability to set permissions and rulesets at a user level is essential to restrict access to specific datasets.
  • Ability for external users (those from outside our organisation) to leverage the API in more restrictive manner.
Read full review
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • It is very user friendly. Users can change rules during run time and change workflow.
  • Huge capacity for queueing messages. It supports all types of adapters like Oracle, Salesforce, SMTP, FTP, etc. Also users can built custom adaptors.
  • If users want to dynamically deploy their solution without any downtime, this is a perfect solution. BizTalk will be a good fit, especially for public-facing websites.
  • Well-proven in the market. I used it when developing a website for Virgin Trains, catering more than 800K user requests per day.
  • Helps in load balancing.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Improvement can come in the interface of the tool, which is sometimes complex and requires a deep understanding of the tool.
  • Improving the different levels of access to the playroom could be helpful because product owners and developers need to see other information.
  • Publishing API and integration of API can be more straightforward.
Read full review
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • Microsoft BizTalk is over engineered for some situtations
  • Microsoft BizTalk can be frustrating to use as it forces you to use the GUI as opposed to code
  • Microsoft BizTalk is very resource intensive to create integrations
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
No answers on this topic
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
BizTalk will always be required at this hospital.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
I can honestly say that the availability of the platform has been incredible, with almost no disruptions during the two years of the implementation. Availability is provided through the distributed architecture that may be deployed in multiple zones. We have had almost no cases of unplanned outages, and most maintenance operations were done during planned downtimes.
Read full review
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I gave a 7 because this product BizTalk does need time and training to get familiar with the usability and features, it is not that easy to use.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
BizTalk Server has been supported for more than 15 years. It is well proven in the market. Microsoft has provided excellent support with technical issues.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Make sure you have everybody and all depts. On board during testing on test server.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
IBM API Connect and Apigee are both robust API management platforms. IBM API Connect was selected for its strong integration capabilities, hybrid cloud deployment options, and comprehensive analytics. It aligns well with organizations seeking flexibility and control over their API ecosystems, especially when dealing with complex integration scenarios across diverse environments.
Read full review
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
BizTalk was selected here mainly because it is easy to integrate to a .NET application (most of them are Web Service, WCF SOAP, WCF REST and Web API) and many backend databases are Microsoft SQL Server. Another benefit is that the monitoring job is easy to set up and centralize with other .NET application monitoring jobs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Our company benefited from IBM API Connect's assistance in establishing cooperation with our outside providers and efficiently managing the API. As a result, we were able to expand our vendor ecosystem.
  • Additionally, creating APIs and implementing them on the goods was not too difficult. Additionally, we were able to ensure that only appropriate people could publish the APIs following evaluation by using role-based access control.
  • Our teams were able to reuse and share departmental APIs and services with each other thanks to the simple, self-service developer site.
Read full review
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • A positive impact has been the quicker turnaround time of a part request and that part showing up in SAP using Biztalk as middleware.
  • A somewhat negative impact has been the somewhat insufficient error logging/message capture settings that Biztalk provide. This has caused occasional delays when attempted to create parts for the business.
  • A somewhat negative impact has been the need to have a specialized developer who understands Biztalk to troubleshoot issues with the Biztalk and SAP interaction when creating parts, and when adding new fields to the parts.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM API Connect Screenshots

Screenshot of API tests and insightsScreenshot of API Manager customization interfaceScreenshot of the API designer