IBM Confluent vs. Kissflow
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Confluent | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
Kissflow | Score8.3 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Kissflow is a low-code platform for custom application development tailored to business operations. Kissflow empowers process owners and IT developers to automate and build processes and applications for internal business operations. | $1,500 per month 50 Users |
| IBM Confluent | Kissflow | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Kissflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Would buy again 4 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| IBM Confluent | Kissflow | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-Code Development |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Kissflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | Zoho Creator Score7.7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | AppSheet Score8.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 | Oracle APEX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Confluent | Kissflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.5 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 9.7 |
| IBM Confluent | Kissflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Kissflow Screenshots |









