IBM Confluent vs. M‑Files
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Confluent | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
M‑Files | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | M-Files delivers Context-First Document Management with a metadata-driven architecture that improves productivity across the document lifecycle. By linking documents to the people, processes, clients, and projects that give them meaning, M-Files creates a unified environment that strengthens governance. | N/A |
| IBM Confluent | M‑Files | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | M‑Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 18 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 11 Answers | |
| IBM Confluent | M‑Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | pdfFiller Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Confluent | M‑Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 9.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.9 |
| Usability | - | 8.2 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| Online Training | - | 9.1 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.2 |
| Configurability | - | 9.6 |
| Product Scalability | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 7.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 7.0 |
| IBM Confluent | M‑Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| In-Person Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | M‑Files Screenshots |









