TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. Vonage Communications APIs

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM InfoSphere Information Server

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AIBM InfoSphere Information Server is a data integration platform used to understand, cleanse, monitor and transform data. The offerings provide massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities.N/A

    Informatica Cloud Data Quality

    Score6.9 out of 10
    N/AThe vendor states that Informatica Data Quality empowers companies to take a holistic approach to managing data quality across the entire organization, and that with Informatica Data Quality, users are able to ensure the success of data-driven digital transformation initiatives and projects across users, types, and scale, while also automating mission-critical tasks.N/A

    Vonage Communications APIs

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AVonage APIs (formerly Nexmo and TokBox) help growing startups and agile enterprises enhance customer experience and realize new business outcomes at scale. With a comprehensive suite of communication channels, a global platform, and expert support, users can abstract the complexity of communications and innovate faster.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data QualityVonage Communications APIs
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data QualityVonage Communications APIs
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    IBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data QualityVonage Communications APIs
    Data Source Connection
    Comparison of Data Source Connection features of IBM InfoSphere Information Server and Informatica Cloud Data Quality and Vonage Communications APIs
    Feature
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    8.7
    4 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Informatica Cloud Data Quality
    -
    Ratings
    Vonage Communications APIs
    -
    Ratings
    Connect to traditional data sources9.94 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL7.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Transformations
    Comparison of Data Transformations features of IBM InfoSphere Information Server and Informatica Cloud Data Quality and Vonage Communications APIs
    Feature
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    9.6
    4 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Informatica Cloud Data Quality
    -
    Ratings
    Vonage Communications APIs
    -
    Ratings
    Simple transformations10.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Complex transformations9.24 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Modeling
    Comparison of Data Modeling features of IBM InfoSphere Information Server and Informatica Cloud Data Quality and Vonage Communications APIs
    Feature
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    8.0
    4 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Informatica Cloud Data Quality
    -
    Ratings
    Vonage Communications APIs
    -
    Ratings
    Data model creation8.72 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Metadata management7.74 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business rules and workflow8.44 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Collaboration8.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing and debugging7.14 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Governance
    Comparison of Data Governance features of IBM InfoSphere Information Server and Informatica Cloud Data Quality and Vonage Communications APIs
    Feature
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    9.7
    4 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Informatica Cloud Data Quality
    -
    Ratings
    Vonage Communications APIs
    -
    Ratings
    Integration with data quality tools10.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with MDM tools9.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Quality
    Comparison of Data Quality features of IBM InfoSphere Information Server and Informatica Cloud Data Quality and Vonage Communications APIs
    Feature
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    -
    Ratings
    Informatica Cloud Data Quality
    8.2
    4 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Vonage Communications APIs
    -
    Ratings
    Data source connectivity00 Ratings8.94 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data profiling00 Ratings8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Master data management (MDM) integration00 Ratings8.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data element standardization00 Ratings7.14 Ratings00 Ratings
    Match and merge00 Ratings7.94 Ratings00 Ratings
    Address verification00 Ratings8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data QualityVonage Communications APIs
    Small Businesses
    Skyvia
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Telegram
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
    Score9.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Telegram
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SolarWinds Task Factory
    Score8.3 out of 10
    SAP Data Services
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Telegram
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data QualityVonage Communications APIs
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (19 ratings)
    7.1
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.6
    (14 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.2
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (2 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM InfoSphere Information ServerInformatica Cloud Data QualityVonage Communications APIs
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    Information Server is extremely useful to replace manual developments that require a lot of coding effort. It significantly increases the productivity of the initial development and the future maintenance of the processes since it has a visual development environment with self-documentation.
    Read full review
    Informatica
    For effective data collaboration, systematic verification of customer information, and address, among others, Informatica Data Quality is a fruitful application to consider. Besides, Informatica Data Quality controls quality through a cleansing process, giving the company a professional outline of candid data profiling and reputable analytics. Finally, Informatica Data Quality allows the simplistic navigation of content, with a dashboard that supports predictability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vonage
    While there are likely a variety of scenarios that would work well with Vonage [Communications APIs (formerly Nexmo)], implementations that need transactional message and response actions are a great fit. Our experience with transactional messaging has been really good and we are continuing to look at opportunities to expand our usage of this part of their service.
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • IIS best for ETL ,not ELT , and many and diffrent source systems.
    • It also can process big data , unstuctured data
    • It is not only DWH , you can use infosphere for analys and see the bigger architecture of your OLTP systems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Informatica
    • The matching algorithms in IDQ are very powerful if you understand the different types that they offer (e.g., Hamming Distance, Jaro, Bigram, etc..). We had to play around with it to see which best suit our own needs of identifying and eliminating duplicate customers. Setting up the whole process (e.g., creating the KeyGenerator Transformation, setting up the matching threshold, etc..) can be somewhat time consuming and a challenge if you don't first standardize your data.
    • The integration with PowerCenter is great if you have both. You can either import your mappings directly to PowerCenter or to an XML file. The only downside is that some of the transformations are unique to IDQ, so you are not really able to edit them once in PowerCenter.
    • The standardizer transformation was key in helping us standardize our customer data (e.g., names, addresses, etc..). It was helpful due to having create a reference table containing the standardized value and the associated unstandardized values. What was great was that if you used Informatica Analyst, a business analyst could login and correct any of the values.
    Read full review
    Vonage
    • I like the delivery speed, it's very instantaneous. As soon as the delivery status changes on the website, the message gets delivered. The rates are also cheap and affordable.
    • The accuracy of the services and the non-stop supportive team.
    • Simple API, easy to integrate with existing notification functionality in your Laravel apps.
    • Ease of implementation. We needed less than one month to go live.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • I would be nice to have a new web development environment for DataStage.
    • Connectivity Packs such as Pack for SAP Application are a little pricey.
    • It is confusing for new developers the possibility of developing jobs using different execution engines such as Parallel or Server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Informatica
    • Several partnerships diminishing the value of technologies
    • Unable to get list of objects from Repository (like sources & targets) that don't have any dependency
    • Scheduling: The built-in scheduling tool has many constraints such as handling Unix/VB scripts etc. Most enterprises use third party tools for this.
    Read full review
    Vonage
    • Written documentation and discovery could be a lot better.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    • Scale of implementation
    • IBM techsupport
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Informatica
    As pointed out earlier, due all the robust features IDQ has, our use f the product is successful and stable. IDQ is being used in multiple sources (from CRM application and in batch mode). As this is an iterative process, we are looking to improve our system efficiency using IDQ.
    Read full review
    Vonage
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Informatica
    Easy to use not only for developers but also business users
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vonage
    The overall usability of Vonage [Communications APIs (formerly Nexmo)] system for message delivery is sufficient for our implementation. Some improvements and additional reporting options in the account administration interface would increase our utilization of the post-delivery data further in order to provide further value-added features for our clients.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Informatica
    The application works well except an occasional error out while using the system. It usually gets fixed when restarting the Infa server
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vonage
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Informatica
    Performance works just fine. It was able to load 200+ business terms, 150+ DQ automation, etc. very well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vonage
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Informatica
    No answers on this topic
    Vonage
    The product feels a bit like a black box since it's built to be an off-the-shelf solution so sometimes it feels like the only way to really understand it is to talk to an engineer directly as the documentation is so-so.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    DataStage is more robust and stable than ODI The ability to perform complex transformations or implement business rules is much more developed in DS
    Read full review
    Informatica
    IDQ is used by a department at my organisation to ensure and enhance the data quality.
    The usage was started with address standardization and now it had been brought to altogether a next level of quality check where it fixes duplicates, junk characters, standardize the names, streets, product descriptions.
    In the past we had issues mainly with duplicate customers and products and this were affecting the sales projection and estimates.
    Read full review
    Vonage
    Nexmo is the best platform in the industry for sure. We don't use all the features that the API provides but we are really satisfied with the ones we use. We are sure this is the best solution in the market if you need to solve the communication in real time with your customers. When we have to build a new website we are going to support the solution with Nexmo.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Informatica
    Scalability works as expected and it is truly an enterprise system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vonage
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Productivity of the development of integration processes.
    • Better documentation and governance.
    • Reduce training costs of various technologies.
    Read full review
    Informatica
    • Integration with tools like PowerCenter helped faster delivery of product, and at the same time conversion
    • Reduce overall project cost due to bad data , bad quality, exceptions identified nearing go-live and post production
    • Employee efficiency is increased exponentially due to more automated, customized tool
    Read full review
    Vonage
    • Allowed us to go to market faster (positive).
    • Greatly limits our claim to quality as the ceiling on video quality is lower than other platforms (negative).
    Read full review
    ScreenShots