IBM Planning Analytics vs. Synoptix

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Synoptix
Score 7.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Synoptic provides ERP financial reporting tools and analysis. This solution is designed to deliver real-time data. The vendor’s value proposition is that their solution empowers users to create financial and operational reports with spreadsheet ease of use.N/A
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsSynoptix
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsSynoptix
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Planning AnalyticsSynoptix
Considered Both Products
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
If compared to Excel, it eliminates version control issues and manual consolidation, which saves time and reduces errors.
On the other hand, if we compared with Hyperion, IBM Planning Analytics is more agile and user-friendly, especially with the Excel integration (PAx) and the …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics was far more robust and worked well with our existing tools and processes.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
The overall tool is robust and complete in its capabilities.
It has an edge over other competitors and state of art technology.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It is truly hard to compare both products. I like both products and would suggest choosing one but trying both. Some things are better through IBM Planning Analytics and some things are better through the IBM Analytics engine. Ultimately I believe that IBM Planning Analytics …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
instead several, manual maintained excel spreadsheets, we have now implemented a save repeatable process to get data in and out to the users
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
We chose IBM Planning Analytics because we find that it still uniquely positions with OLAP engine
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is my primary focus
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM watsonx.ai and IBM Cognos Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In our organization, we chose IBM Planning Analytics because, in our opinion, IBM Planning Analytics has more features
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics flexibility is what makes it stand out between the others. Generally in other platforms you are restricted to predefined flows. Although it sounds good in the beginning, when you start using those systems you face some challenges when trying to adapt new …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Workday Adaptive Planning is really tough to set up and use as a fresher. So I have always faced difficulties helping new joinees to set up and use it. But with IBM Planning Analytics, it is more straightforward and easier to use with a good interface.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
As it is related to MS Excel, IBM Planning Analytics is a much more robust and complete solution for the CFO or COO in mind. Oracle Hyperion stacks up nicely against IBM Planning Analytics. However, IBM's investment in AI allows Planning Analytics users more options and speed.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It includes Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Anaplan, and Adaptive Insight before deciding to choose IBM Planning Analytics. We selected Planning Analytics because of its work with complicated and many area models, the capability to work with big amounts of data, and compatibility …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Other options, namely Anaplan, Oracle EPM Cloud, and SAP Analytics Cloud, were also considered. Anaplan's interface lacked analytical depth. For product design metrics, flexibility was not as good in Oracle EPM Cloud. The final choice was moved by the fact that it was driven …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Prior to making the decision to go with IBM Planning Analytics, we had considered such options as Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, and SAP Analytics Cloud. Despite the collaborative solutions offered by Anaplan and the good connection with other systems by SAP, the superb set of tool …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In this case, Vena and Planful are considered as other products that can be compared with IBM Planning Analytics, but among them, IBM Planning Analytics is more optimal in terms of user interface and integration. Its preconfigure risk assessment model and its format and …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
This was an older verions that was also very good, but the new IBM Planning Analytics is a far better tool that enables better scenario planning or what-if analysis.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM PA is like having pivot tables on steroids. Possibilities are endless.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Ability to plan more products, locations, customers
Less expensive
Client already had IBM PA for FP&A
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Sandboxing,Integration and Flexibility
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is easier to use and setup for me. Easier to make reports. Works fast
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
We have been using IBM Planning Analytics and haven't explored other products that could cover our business needs.
Synoptix
Chose Synoptix
I can't think of any other report writing software/platforms that I've used in the recent past.
Chose Synoptix
Synoptix was in place before my employment began (12 years ago) and there has never been a discussion about switching to anything else.
Chose Synoptix
Synoptix is more oriented to users as their own developers. You do not need to understand any sort of coding or languages. If you are working in financials you just need to know your trial balance. The menus and programing are so user friendly the programming is "kinda …
Chose Synoptix
Doesn't have all the capabilities of some other report writers but is much more affordable and provides us with what we need.
Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsSynoptix
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Synoptix
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.30 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.30 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.70 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Synoptix
7.4
Ratings
5% below category average
Drill-down analysis7.90 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.80 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Synoptix
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
Publish to Web7.90 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.90 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report Versioning8.30 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.90 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.3
Ratings
2% below category average
Synoptix
6.9
Ratings
8% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.70 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization6.80 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.80 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.80 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.8
Ratings
7% below category average
Synoptix
7.6
Ratings
10% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)7.80 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.50 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.30 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.1
Ratings
5% below category average
Synoptix
6.7
Ratings
11% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access7.50 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Mobile Application6.70 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile5.90 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Synoptix
6.6
Ratings
20% below category average
Long-term financial planning8.30 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Financial budgeting8.70 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Forecasting9.30 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Management reporting8.30 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Synoptix
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Financial data consolidation9.20 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.20 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.30 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Minority Ownership8.80 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting7.20 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails7.80 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
Ratings
6% above category average
Synoptix
7.2
Ratings
9% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting8.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Management Reporting8.50 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting9.20 Ratings7.30 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing6.80 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Synoptix
6.5
Ratings
22% below category average
Personalized dashboards8.90 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.90 Ratings5.90 Ratings
KPIs8.20 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.30 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data8.30 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Synoptix
7.4
Ratings
9% below category average
Flat file integration8.40 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Excel data integration9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.80 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsSynoptix
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsSynoptix
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsSynoptix
Likelihood to Recommend
For a CFO or a COO to do budgeting and planning, IBM Planning Analytics would be essential. It is a tool that can take in multiple data sources and showcase them in a multidimensional way. If you are looking just for a BI or reporting tool, Planning Analytics would be considered "overkill".
Read full review
Synoptix has been great for us to allow end users access to the data and information they need to make informed decisions without letting them have full access to all ERP functions. It has also been very easy to create custom reports that meet our needs. It is also nimble enough to create quick reports that are needed with a small turnaround
Read full review
Pros
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
  • Easy report building interface with an query interface that allows financial users the ability to conduct complex queries without difficulty.
  • The ability to create reporting that allows us to review in-depth financial review by drilling down into accounts to find transnational data easily.
  • Easily maintained and monitored with simple upgrade installations and end point installation.
  • Great knowledge base for review and trouble-shooting.
  • Highly knowledgeable and easy to work with staff.
Read full review
Cons
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
  • The web portal could be improved both in its presentation and organization of data and speed of delivery.
  • It would be ideal to run and publish reports for multi-departmental users in one report. In other words, have a single report with multiple tabs representing each department and not have multiple reports (one for each department).
  • When new production filters (under financial setup) are added these should automatically appear in order.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Great product and great support.
Read full review
Usability
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
It didn't take long to learn how it works and has always been easy to navigate and accomplish all that we have needed. Whenever there have been any issues Synopotix has been great to address them in a timely manner and have always been able to resolve the issues we have had
Read full review
Support Rating
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
Support does not know much about software solutions. As an example, I have struggled for weeks just to set up LDAP that should be fairly simple.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Good guidance of what steps will halppen.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. If deeply invested into SAP already than the SAP BPC will be the best fit to maintain the investment.
Read full review
Synoptix is more oriented to users as their own developers. You do not need to understand any sort of coding or languages. If you are working in financials you just need to know your trial balance. The menus and programing are so user friendly the programming is "kinda obvious"
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Much higher degree of accuracy in forecasting with the use of predictive analysis from historical data
  • Dozens of man hours saved in routine processes that are now handled with minimal human interaction
  • One system that holds the "source of truth," consolidating multiple systems together that were only accessible individually before
Read full review
  • The cost of Synoptix is fairly minimal compared to what it's used for. I would say that strictly from a cost perspective it is a very good value.
  • It does save a decent amount of time when pulling financial data, so there are some labor cost savings there.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis