IBM SPSS Statistics vs. Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM SPSS Statistics
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
SPSS Statistics is a software package used for statistical analysis. It is now officially named "IBM SPSS Statistics". Companion products in the same family are used for survey authoring and deployment (IBM SPSS Data Collection), data mining (IBM SPSS Modeler), text analytics, and collaboration and deployment (batch and automated scoring services).
$105
per month per user
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Qlik Sense® is a self-service BI platform for data discovery and visualization. It supports a full range of analytics use cases—data governance, pixel-perfect reporting, and collaboration. Its Associative Engine indexes and connects relationships between data points for creating actionable insights.
$200
per month
Pricing
IBM SPSS StatisticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Editions & Modules
Base
USD 3,830
one-time fee per user
Standard
USD 8,440
one-time fee per user
Professional
USD 16,900
one-time fee per user
Premium
USD 25,200
one-time fee per user
Monthly subscription
USD 105
per month per user
Annual subscription
USD 1,188.00
per year per user
Starter
$200
per month
Standard
$825
per month
Premium
$2750
per month
Qlik Sense (On-Premise)
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM SPSS StatisticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM SPSS StatisticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Considered Both Products
IBM SPSS Statistics

No answer on this topic

Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Tableau is too expensive. Microsoft BI is what we might switch to in terms of our department's skill set, available (free) training resources through forums and youtube, and pricepoint for a nonprofit.
Chose Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)

I have worked on IBM Cognos , Power BI for reporting and Dashboards in different organisations.

I can say the Cognos is for standard reporting with inbuilt scheduling and mail delivery services, Power BI is a bit more user friendly unlike Cognos and QlikSense.

I have also worked …

Features
IBM SPSS StatisticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM SPSS Statistics
-
Ratings
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.9
315 Ratings
4% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.3216 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.0313 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.4228 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM SPSS Statistics
-
Ratings
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.0
326 Ratings
14% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.0322 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings6.0315 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings6.1154 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.9299 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM SPSS Statistics
-
Ratings
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.8
278 Ratings
5% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings6.3210 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings7.3257 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.9176 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.9183 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings8.4108 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM SPSS Statistics
-
Ratings
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
6.7
314 Ratings
18% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings6.7307 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.4283 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings6.1195 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings5.62 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM SPSS Statistics
-
Ratings
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.8
297 Ratings
8% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings6.6276 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.5272 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings7.4275 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.9218 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM SPSS Statistics
-
Ratings
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.5
221 Ratings
3% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings8.0215 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings8.0133 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings9.0185 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
IBM SPSS Statistics
-
Ratings
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
8.4
145 Ratings
8% above category average
REST API00 Ratings8.0125 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings8.594 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings8.094 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings8.571 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings8.597 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings8.984 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM SPSS StatisticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Alteryx Platform
Alteryx Platform
Score 9.1 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Alteryx Platform
Alteryx Platform
Score 9.1 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM SPSS StatisticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Likelihood to Recommend
5.6
(103 ratings)
8.3
(331 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(23 ratings)
8.4
(7 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(15 ratings)
8.3
(14 ratings)
Availability
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(12 ratings)
7.3
(9 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.7
(7 ratings)
7.3
(5 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
5.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM SPSS StatisticsQlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
SPSS's ability to deal with things like survey verbatims is a significant competitive disadvantage. The ability to do most of what researchers do without having to learn to program (think R or Python) is the primary advantage SPSS brings to bear.
Read full review
Qlik
Qlik Sense is a program whose purpose is to greatly improve all your operations and use of all data in an organic way. The mission will always be to increase the economic and commercial processes of the company in a short time. I recommended it for its high technology, which was Created for this area, the results are successful. We have noticed how it has increased relationships with our clients thanks to the credibility and security that we provide.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • SPSS has been around for quite a while and has amassed a large suite of functionality. One of its longest-running features is the ability to automate SPSS via scripting, AKA "syntax." There is a very large community of practice on the internet who can help newbies to quickly scale up their automation abilities with SPSS. And SPSS allows users to save syntax scripting directly from GUI wizards and configuration windows, which can be a real life-saver if one is not an experienced coder.
  • Many statistics package users are doing scientific research with an eye to publish reproducible results. SPSS allows you to save datasets and syntax scripting in a common format, facilitating attempts by peer reviewers and other researchers to quickly and easily attempt to reproduce your results. It's very portable!
  • SPSS has both legacy and modern visualization suites baked into the base software, giving users an easily mountable learning curve when it comes to outputting charts and graphs. It's very easy to start with a canned look and feel of an exported chart, and then you can tweak a saved copy to change just about everything, from colors, legends, and axis scaling, to orientation, labels, and grid lines. And when you've got a chart or graph set up the way you like, you can export it as an image file, or create a template syntax to apply to new visualizations going forward.
  • SPSS makes it easy for even beginner-level users to create statistical coding fields to support multidimensional analysis, ensuring that you never need to destructively modify your dataset.
  • In closing, SPSS's long and successful tenure ensures that just about any question a new user may have about it can be answered with a modicum of Google-fu. There are even several fully-fledged tutorial websites out there for newbie perusal.
Read full review
Qlik
  • Flexibility in data recording, from the app, as well as in handling them. Allowing you to view reports quickly and effectively.
  • Easy to generate dynamic graphics according to our needs.
  • It is very easy to use, intuitive, so it does not generate costs in the learning process compared to the tool with collaborators
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • collaboration - SPSS lacks collaboration features which makes it near impossible to collaborate with my team on analysis. We have to send files back and forth, which is tedious.
  • integration - I wish SPSS had integration capabilities with some of the other tools that I use (e.g., Airtable, Figma, etc.)
  • user interface - this could definitely be modernized. In my experience, the UI is clunky and feels dated, which can negatively impact my experience using the tool.
Read full review
Qlik
  • Scalability is RAM limited, all data is associative and in-memory so server's RAM is directly proportional to performance
  • Limitation on advanced analytics capabilities in the form of R integration to perform complex statistical and analytical calculations
  • Can have more intuitive interface
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Both
money and time are essential for success in terms of return on investment for any kind of research based project work. Using a Likert-scale questionnaire is very easy for data entry and analysis
using IBM SPSS. With the help of IBM SPSS, I found very fast and reliable data
entry and data analysis for my research. Output from SPSS is very easy to
interpret for data analysis and findings
Read full review
Qlik
Qlik Sense is a constantly improving it's software and working with its' users to make it better. They are great at keeping their users informed of progress and care about delivering a quality product
Read full review
Usability
IBM
Probably because I have been using it for so long that I have used all of the modules, or at least almost all of the modules, and the way SPSS works is second nature to me, like fish to swimming.
Read full review
Qlik
Qlik Sense has a better and easy to learn user interface compared with other analytics tool which always help us to create regular and adhoc reports within the stipulated time frame and can be easily refreshed at a scheduled time and sent to multiple stakeholders for timely update regarding the Key metrics indicator.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
SPSS can tend to crash when I am trying to do a lot of data. This can slow me down when I need to do a lot of data
Read full review
Qlik
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
SPSS does the job, but it can be slow. I do have to plan a lot of time to get through a huge amount of data.
Read full review
Qlik
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
I have not contacted IBM SPSS for support myself. However, our IT staff has for trying to get SPSS Text Analytics Module to work. The issue was never resolved, but I'm not sure if it was on the IT's end or on SPSS's end
Read full review
Qlik
Qlik is great for companies with lots of business domains and departments because it scales well, especially if data that is reported is saved in SQL and similar structures. Its ease of use and good UI enables business units to create and manage their own reports. That removes a great burden of creating and managing/modifying these pages from the IT team. Overall, it's a win-win for both IT and business units.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Qlik
The instructor was very knowledgeable.
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Qlik
The online instructor was very knowledgeable.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
Have a plan for managing the yearly upgrade cycle. Most users work in the desktop version, so there needs to be a mechanism for either pushing out new versions of the software or a key manager to deal with updated licensing keys. If you have a lot of users this needs to be planned for in advance.
Read full review
Qlik
Hire Qlik consultants. It's better done by them or with their aid.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
If you have made it this far, you should have a very good idea of how SPSS stacks up the competition (data processing and analytics tools). Even the free ones, such as r Studio or Stata, are leaps and bounds ahead of SPSS. IBM is resting on a reputation developed nearly 30 years ago and has shown no desire to improve.
Read full review
Qlik
The customization of the platform opens up plenty of other options depending on the use cases. The API layer is incredibly rich and makes integration of Qlik based visualization into web pages a simple and effective pattern. It's been very easy to use with a great community made up of professionals. Qlik Sense has introduces artificial Intelligence into my data visualization and reporting activity.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
IBM Cognos Analytics may have been designed to scale up to a very large number of users however we are a small business with small number of users and the program worked equally well for us. We would highly recommend the product for any business no matter the size, small to large.
Read full review
Qlik
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • I found SPSS easier to use than SAS as it's more intuitive to me.
  • The learning curve to use SPSS is less compared to SAS.
  • I used SAS, to a much lesser extent than SPSS. However, it seems that SAS may be more suitable for users who understand programming. With SPSS, users can perform many statistical tests without the need to know programming.
Read full review
Qlik
  • Once an app is published and running good, we can quickly see the time we save to analyze data.
  • It's hard sometimes to realize the money we save by using this system.
  • People start understanding the power of data and asking more questions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM SPSS Statistics Screenshots

Screenshot of SPSS Statistics Forecasting. This enables users to build time-series forecasts regardless of their skill level.Screenshot of SPSS Statistics Regression. These predict categorical outcomes and apply nonlinear regression procedures.Screenshot of IBM SPSS Statistics Neural Networks. These can discover complex relationships and improve predictive models.Screenshot of IBM SPSS Statistics Curated Help. These can interpret correlation output.Screenshot of IBM SPSS Statistics AI Output Assistant interprets statistical output in easy to consume language

Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense) Screenshots

Screenshot of Qlik Sense Cash Flow DashboardScreenshot of Qlik Sense Global Smart SearchScreenshot of Qlik Sense Smart Data Compression - Get immediate insight on large dataScreenshot of Extend, mix and mash-up with our APIsScreenshot of Add "External data" with Qlik DataMarket - Data as a ServiceScreenshot of Visualization Bundle