IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
WebSphere Hybrid Edition from IBM is a collection of WebSphere application runtimes and modernization tools that provides support for on-premise and major public cloud deployments, in virtual machines, containers and Kubernetes. The user can choose any WebSphere edition and deploy Liberty and application modernization tools to help move to a cloud-native architecture, modernize existing applications and support an existing WebSphere estate.
$88.50
per month
OCI
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is Oracles's infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) platform which combines the utility of public cloud with the granular control, security, and predictability of on-premises infrastructure.N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
Pricing
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionOracle Cloud InfrastructureOracle WebLogic Server
Editions & Modules
Application Server
$88.50
per month
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionOCIOracle WebLogic Server
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionOracle Cloud InfrastructureOracle WebLogic Server
Considered Multiple Products
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Websphere Liberty has a cloud ready runtime, embebed with a Developlment standards like spring, ee standards

IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition has a native connections to IBM products, so when you have a IBM Environtment it the best way to get all IBM Beneffits
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
IBM Websphere was better suited for our needs as we are a primarily Java shop, and it provided better customization and potential ROI. It also requires less downtime, and support is easier than Weblogic. Also, Websphere is better suited for a hybrid environment.
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
IBM and weblogic are equally robust and support JVM's very well but where IBM is better is its out of the box integration with active directory that makes it easier to manage access control and security posture. In addition, the licensing model for IBM is lot more flexible for …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
WAS is an IBM product and gels with IBM database product. So, we have decided to go with IBM WAS. WAS supports more data sources than Oracle web logic. So, ideally it can be used with multiple databases.
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
IBM support is better than Oracle, from past experience. Weblogic and WebSphere Application Server are somewhat similar versus the open source JBOSS. For many applications we had selected WAS to have a supported platform and used some of the competitors in other various use …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
I have worked on JBOSS and WEBLOGIC Application servers apart from Websphere application servers. WebSphere Application Server has a more user friendly admin console GUI. I believe WAS administration and maintenance activities are more easy and effective as compared to other …
Chose IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Websphere Application Server supports enterprise Java open standards, streamlines deployment, has very flexible management capabilities and better reliability and availability.
OCI
Chose Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
AWS is very costly compared to OCI and most of the Oracle Database and applications are not certified to run on AWS.
Oracle WebLogic Server
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I have only used WebSphere for an evaluation period but I felt it was even harder to learn and it's cost was going to be bigger in the long run. Oracle WebLogic Server was more like the middle ground for what we needed at the time, both in terms of costs and learning curve.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
My manager considered switching a few years ago to other application servers like JBoss or IBM WebSphere. The big reason behind the idea was cost. We all knew that WebLogic Server was suited to do the jobs very well. Oracle sales representatives worked well with my manager to …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
WebSphere is another major contender and they have pitching and are more updated/streamlined. I still prefer WebLogic from an administrator standpoint. Support is much better and there are more options for finding answers to issues or new features.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We tested Red Hat JBoss. Then we decided to use WebLogic because of support issues we had with the other.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle WebLogic Application Server and IBM WebSphere Application Server provide an enterprise-level well-supported platform for robust architecture solutions. They provide tools for management, monitoring, and interaction with multiple other platforms in the market. JBoss is …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
IBM Websphere is less easy to use, you need sometimes consultants from IBM to get the same things done by yourself with WebLogic
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Weblogic is better than JBoss in many way such as:
  • being able to deploy in multiple ways
  • clustering is supported for all of basic APIs and even JMS is also supported which is advantageous for high-availability
Features
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionOracle Cloud InfrastructureOracle WebLogic Server
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
7.3
31 Ratings
9% below category average
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
-
Ratings
Oracle WebLogic Server
8.1
36 Ratings
1% above category average
IDE support5.626 Ratings00 Ratings6.032 Ratings
Security management8.231 Ratings00 Ratings9.034 Ratings
Administration and management7.731 Ratings00 Ratings7.036 Ratings
Application server performance8.131 Ratings00 Ratings8.535 Ratings
Installation7.530 Ratings00 Ratings8.036 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance6.726 Ratings00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
-
Ratings
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
7.0
137 Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle WebLogic Server
-
Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime00 Ratings8.1132 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic scaling00 Ratings7.9132 Ratings00 Ratings
Elastic load balancing00 Ratings7.6121 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-configured templates00 Ratings5.6121 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring tools00 Ratings6.8132 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images00 Ratings6.6119 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating system support00 Ratings6.4131 Ratings00 Ratings
Security controls00 Ratings7.4133 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation00 Ratings7.095 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionOracle Cloud InfrastructureOracle WebLogic Server
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.4 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionOracle Cloud InfrastructureOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(33 ratings)
7.8
(149 ratings)
7.5
(43 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.5
(4 ratings)
8.6
(6 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(6 ratings)
7.0
(14 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.4
(27 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.7
(4 ratings)
7.7
(19 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionOracle Cloud InfrastructureOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM WebSphere Hybrid edition is well-suited for the development and deployment of large enterprise-level applications such as Electronic Health Records that are used in our organization. IBM WebSphere is appropriate for organizations that require strong security and compliance as it provides a high level of security and compliance features. This works well with organizations that are subject to strict regulatory requirements, such as hospitals.
Read full review
Oracle
As per our usage Oracle Cloud Infrastructure for almost 6 years hosting 500 + customers I can say its well suited application for any small scale to larger scale application as it can handle that capacity and provide more reliable cloud service only if you need any messaging service like pub/sub or sqs better to consider other services.
Read full review
Oracle
If you need to have complex options in place you can count on Weblogic to be a robust Applicational Server you can rely on. But you would need to keep an eye on maintaining the framework updated quite frequently to avoid security breaches and subsequent severe situations. If you don't have other infrastructure for test purposes, I wouldn't advise you on having devs and QA installing this heavy application in their local machines, there are other lightweight solutions that would be a better fit for that.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition has done marvelous in building and deploying Java Enterprise applications.
  • It also does well in automating deployment and scaling. This has made it easier for our organization to deploy updates to our applications.
  • IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition does well in security by providing features that protect enterprise applications.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure has a generous free tier, moreso than other hyperscalers, with an always-free tier that guarantees certain products are always free
  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure allows you to size VMs with differing combinations of CPU and RAM, which is contrary to other hyperscalers that have specific pre-defined combinations only
  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure regularly provides free certification exam offers
Read full review
Oracle
  • The brand relation between Java and WebLogic Application Server usually provides a quicker access to programming features and their availability for the applications deployed.
  • The access to centralized configuration both from console and command line WLST eases the implementation of changes major or not in an organized and expedite way.
  • The maturity of the product is also visible in the available tools provided by the product itself, for both monitoring of resources and alerting for availability and thresholds
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Ease of use in terms of deployment, give simple interface to do simple stuff like Tomcat, JBoss or GlassFish.
  • Takes long time to start the server.
  • The Liferay wars need to be decorated and then deployed. Perhaps we could simplify that.
  • Some of the concepts are good for complexity that WAS can handle but could be simplified and better documented, like concepts of well and profile, context, etc.
  • A Liferay war file created using Liferay Developer studio runs fine in Tomcat, however that may not run in WAS 7.x because it needs to be decorated. I had one war for a Liferay portlet with a simple cron job, and had hard time running to WAS server. It was running on the latest free download done on my friends m/c. Other times I have seen that there are issues running a war file that runs on Tomcat but runs on WAS after lot of customization for WAS.
  • The corporations like this however, the product may need better vibrant community of users where issues can be discussed.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Navigating the UI takes lots of getting used to. It reminds me of older GCP (just to get used to where everything is).
  • Permission for different things always seemed to be more difficult than it really needed to be. Once you got them set up you were good but updating anything or creating new permissions for just about anything took longer than I thought it should.
  • Based on how the buttons were laid out, it was pretty easy to delete all of your DNS records, and backing them up was not as intuitive as I'd like with the UI, but it was easy to do using a script.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Debugging issues has been difficult sometimes, the documentation is too dense and finding the the root cause for an specific issue takes time.
  • The Oracle WebLogic Server console UI feels old and gives a sense of lack of innovation even though it provides so much functionality.
  • I'm not sure if Oracle WebLogic Server supports more modern frameworks, but it feels more like a Java EE specific, maybe there's an opportunity there to appeal to newer application platforms
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Mostly we will be renewing unless the strategic direction changes drastically or there are other complelling external circumstances. We've been on a multi year project to modernize our legacy applications and that effort will continue for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Oracle
Reliability: Very dependable and stable OCI services have been for the business operations.Performance: The speed and efficiency of OCI in meeting their computing and storage needs.Scalability: The ease and effectiveness of scaling resources up or down to accommodate changing demands.Security: The robustness and effectiveness of OCI's security features in protecting their data and applications.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
WebSphere Application Server is used across our organization. Most projects use this for Java products and applications. Being robust and scalable makes it even more usable. We love using WebSphere Application Server due to its configuration management ability made simple and vast across all java related parameters. It is dependent on the features and upgrades and IBM releases some great upgrades to WebSphere Application Server.
Read full review
Oracle
The services & products in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure needs more improvement to beat other Cloud service providers. The price is good & Security processes are good. We are requiring to put more effort in supporting this Oracle Cloud Infrastructure than other Cloud service providers. Probably better ways are there but is not super easy to find or not super available
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Server has so many features that sometimes it's hard to find the right place to setup things, I think the dated user interface does not help with that either. This has a direct impact when deciding to use it as your application server, you'd need to have the right people and invest the time needed to master it. If you're application justifies it then it will definitely be a great choice in the long run.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Yeah sometimes we had to face unplanned outages due to underlying infrastructure issues, so not every time,e but once in a while we face issues with availability. But the good thing is we have redundancy with DR setup and multi region so we can manage.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
Deploys fairly quick enough and like the roll-out update feature decreasing the downtime and also plays well with other integration tools as well.
Read full review
Oracle
From the start, I was surprised by response times and image quality accessing windows VMs with RDP. GCP, Azure and -many offerings in AWS- don't perform this speed. Also, that's evident in the quality of Infrastructure Management Team, because I just received one warning regarding a region failure, what confirms that's a mature platform.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
IBM was quick to respond when we had an issue with our specific infrastructure. We raised a PMR, which they picked up quickly and updated us about every step of the way. We had an appropriate fix for quite a business critical issue within a fortnight, which was impressive!
Read full review
Oracle
Overall it is amazing, there is always room for improvement. We have weekly updates that tend to slow the program used more and more. We had to change some reports within Oracle because the others wouldn’t load. This is tied to our payroll and the delays are causing many time constraint issues and panic. We have to create a new report when one breaks. Otherwise awesome!
Read full review
Oracle
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Effective training provided, much data productivity while doing training
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
detailed and easy to understand.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Easier way to implement, vary much supportive way doing the implementation
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Cleo Integration Clould has many bells and whistles; however, when we added more maps and trading partners, it really slowed down. We found that the Cleo support was very slow to respond and there was a language barrier. IBM Websphere had better customer support and its processing was much faster than Cleo Integration Cloud
Read full review
Oracle
We used Microsoft Azure and Docker earlier and faced some difficulties like Microsoft Azure and Docker. Occasionally, the generation of large images can delay deployment. It is also necessary for me to admit that Microsoft Azure and Docker have a somewhat steep learning curve. Proper paperwork needs to be there. Docker has issues with performance on a number of platforms. On the other hand, OCI is easy to deploy and easy to understand.
Read full review
Oracle
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like Apache Tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from time to get code into production.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
was not part of initial purchase team. Anyways, i think unit pricing and billing frequency is good compared to other Cloud service providers, when it comes to Cloud Capital expenditure & Operational expenditure. Would be more interested in exploring more options where customers can get more cost relaxations on trying out new cloud services in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure for example a new App or a feature
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
We have hosted around 500 + customers on this cloud so till day not faced any major issues, so we can use it for any kind of products and it can hold the load and easily scale based on need.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Services & Infra wise is ok to use & host applications & services. Security wise also good for a Cloud service provider. It is a interesting area to explore & using it for day to day needs can be further improvised in future probably. Modern day Services like AI and Machine learning could be improved
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Continuous uptime of the business applications we manage
  • It's now much simpler for me to build and deploy cloud-native applications.
  • Because it can offload for me management and maintenance of the application server to IBM I can focus on the development, deployment and testing of the applications which is more important
Read full review
Oracle
  • Oracle Cloud helps us build and deploy apps quickly, getting our products out the door faster.
  • With real-time insights from Oracle Cloud, we can give customers personalized experiences that boost satisfaction.
  • Migrating to Oracle saves us cash on hardware and maintenance, which we can use for innovation and growth.
Read full review
Oracle
  • WebLogic Application Server definitely had a positive ROI since all the applications are deployed on a single platform and making maintenance extremely cost effective.
  • Since all major cloud vendors support and maintain WebLogic, it gives us an opportunity to explore possibilities to move the organizational infrastructure on to the cloud without too much effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots

OCI Screenshots

Screenshot of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Global FootprintScreenshot of 2-5x Faster Performance vs On-premises and Other Clouds (Storage Review)Screenshot of One Cloud for the Most Intensive Enterprise and Infra-heavy WorkloadsScreenshot of Gen 1 vs Gen 2 Cloud AdvantageScreenshot of Always Free Services