Fin by Intercom vs. Zendesk Chat

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fin by Intercom
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Fin is Intercom’s AI Agent for customer service, designed to deliver high-quality answers, even for complex queries. It works with any helpdesk, or it can be paired with Intercom’s next-generation Helpdesk to get the full Intercom Customer Service Suite.
$0.99
one-time fee per 1 resolution
Zendesk Chat
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Zendesk Chat (formerly Zopim) is a live chat tool developed by the Singaporean company also called Zopim, acquired by Zendesk in April 2014.
$11.20
per month
Pricing
Fin by IntercomZendesk Chat
Editions & Modules
Fin with your current helpdesk
$0.99
one-time fee per 1 resolution
Copilot add-on
$35
per month per user
The Early Stage program
$65
per month (6 support seats)
Proactive Support Plus add-on
$99
per month
Fin with Intercom’s Helpdesk
from $39 + $0.99 per Fin resolution
per month per seat
Lite
$0
per user
Basic
$14
per user
Advanced
$25
per user
Premium
$55
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fin by IntercomZendesk Chat
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsFin comes with a 90-day money-back guarantee. Here's how it works: Use Fin in at least 250 conversations within the first 90 days after trial. If you're not satisfied, you can request a refund of up to $1M. Refund requests must be submitted within 90 days of starting the subscription.The pricing above is price per user per month. You will get a discount when you opt for annual payment.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Fin by IntercomZendesk Chat
Considered Both Products
Fin by Intercom
Chose Fin by Intercom
Intercom is a little more user friendly than Zendesk. Also, the ability to have all tickets flow to one channel as opposed to having to have Zendesk Chat & Zendesk Support was a big factor.
Chose Fin by Intercom
Zendesk Chat provides live chat functionality and is part of the larger Zendesk suite, which includes customer support and ticketing solutions. However, we chose Intercom after careful consideration of our specific needs, budget, and the level of integration with our existing …
Chose Fin by Intercom
Intercom is just so much better; Our company was using both Zendesk and Intercom for two different products we offer. We brought them all over to Intercom, and they are really happy about the shift. They didn't use any AI in Zendesk, though, so Fin is their first experience …
Chose Fin by Intercom
We used it a few years ago, and it was not as feature-rich for our needs. It lacked true AI capabilities, was hard for users to understand, and created workaround issues. The internal ticket system was difficult to use and led to many missed issues and calls.
Chose Fin by Intercom
Fin by Intercom outperforms Zendesk in almost all metrics as a user-friendly, experienced-focused platform. Zendesk's chat functionality is more limited than Intercom's and the AI agent is not as helpful.

Our primary business partner uses Zendesk, and this is what we use to …
Chose Fin by Intercom
Zendesk isn't even in the same league (I last used zendesk in 2023)
Chose Fin by Intercom
Beats them all in my opinion, Intercom's ease of use and intuitive design cannot be beat compared to others. We had a look at both Zendesk and Freshchat in the past and we saw very quickly that we're already using the best tool for the job. My only "complaint" would be the cost …
Chose Fin by Intercom
I used Zendesk briefly but found it difficult to navigate — I often couldn’t tell what was going on or how to simply reply to a ticket. In contrast, Intercom is much more intuitive and user-friendly. Its clean interface and support for multiple communication formats like …
Chose Fin by Intercom
As explained previously, most of these platforms were focused on tickets, most reports only work with tickets, there is no way to postpone a service without turning it into a ticket, and since our response time target is a maximum of 2 minutes, these platforms were unable to …
Chose Fin by Intercom
Honestly, we haven't really looked at this, but we do use it for another team because a third-party works with it.

Otherwise, I am extremely happy with Intercom and have not looked towards another software.
Chose Fin by Intercom
Intercom missing the merging option, it's way easier but the merging is very important. However, Zendesk is little bit old fashion and not modern like Intercom
Chose Fin by Intercom
The ease of usage and AI abilities of Intercom make it the best out of the group
Chose Fin by Intercom
Intercom is better for those, as It is easier to customize and implement integrations/automation. The UI/UX is much simpler in Intercom.
Chose Fin by Intercom
Intercom does an exceptional job of linking my service offerings to customer support. Its proactive support is a significant differentiator among all these competitors, which sets it apart the most. It dramatically enhances customer engagement and streamlines communication …
Chose Fin by Intercom
We found Intercom's layout to be more user-friendly and the options for integration and setup to be much easier than with other products we looked for.
Chose Fin by Intercom
LiveChat was our previous solution and was so bad for us that we decided to switch - the functionalities are so basic and/or requires dev support for everything, that it was hard to maintain.
Zendesk was not a flexible enough system for us and the LiveChat support was not good …
Chose Fin by Intercom
Intercom is a lot smoother and has more integration ability. It's macro features are a lot easier to navigate and control as well. The help center is also a huge bonus and the way it integrates into the chat is a lot less stressful to put together and utilize. Intercom makes …
Chose Fin by Intercom
I didn't make the call. It was my manager or leadership who decided that, so this one does not apply to me, unfortunately. However, as I've mentioned, it should've been for ease of use and efficiency. The exact reasons are not disclosed to me. Great job Intercom you're doing it …
Chose Fin by Intercom
Zendesk was very slow and clunky to operate.
The system often bugged out and the assigning of emails was poor at best, once assigned it would be very hard to find that ticket again unless it was assigned to you directly.
The search function and live chat function of Zendesk were …
Zendesk Chat
Chose Zendesk Chat
ZD chat is much better at being streamlined with ZD email, obviously. but the functionality of Intercom and the way it worked was a lot cleaner. However, we use a round-robin style of messaging with our CSRs, and ZD chat does this much better.
Features
Fin by IntercomZendesk Chat
Chat Analytics and Reports
Comparison of Chat Analytics and Reports features of Product A and Product B
Fin by Intercom
-
Ratings
Zendesk Chat
8.4
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Chat history and transcripts00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Chat reporting00 Ratings8.65 Ratings
Chat and web analytics00 Ratings8.54 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Fin by IntercomZendesk Chat
Small Businesses
LocaliQ
LocaliQ
Score 8.8 out of 10
Gist
Gist
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Piper the AI SDR by Qualified
Piper the AI SDR by Qualified
Score 9.2 out of 10
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Conversica
Conversica
Score 4.1 out of 10
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Fin by IntercomZendesk Chat
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(385 ratings)
8.6
(23 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(21 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(294 ratings)
7.0
(5 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.8
(10 ratings)
8.4
(3 ratings)
Online Training
7.4
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.6
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Fin by IntercomZendesk Chat
Likelihood to Recommend
Intercom
It's great for a web-enabled tool, so there is immediate ability to give feedback or ask questions. It isn't as easy to set up a desktop application as it would require more coding experience. Some older users are skeptical of its abilities, and that it is taking away from customer service, but in our use, it enhances it - that is a tough barrier to breach.
Read full review
Zendesk
Zendesk Chat is suited for all the support teams that provide real-time assistance. Like if someone wants to block the debit/credit card, it is a high-priority case that needs real-time assistance. Whereas issues like close my account, and invoice request doesn't need real-time assistance, where Zendesk tickets support will be perfect.
Read full review
Pros
Intercom
  • Serves as the first point of interaction.
  • Answers questions based on the knowledge base.
  • Tries to suggest a solution for reported issues (in some cases).
  • Gives the option to improve its answer.
  • Learns from other conversations and replies by humans.
  • Understands other languages.
  • Interprets images (somewhat).
Read full review
Zendesk
  • Extremely fluid chat interface allows for easy communication.
  • It can be used directly on a website page or as a widget.
  • Allows the end user to translate the chat into their own native language.
  • Notifies you with pending chats via on-screen notifications and sound effects.
Read full review
Cons
Intercom
  • While Fin by Intercom AI is great, I think it still struggles a little in giving nuanced answers. For example, we provide a custom product to customers, to the same question may have different answers for different customers. While I don't expect Fin by Intercom to know all nuances etc., Fin by Intercom often gives overly certain or in-flexible answers despite Fin by Intercom guidance etc added.
  • Letting conversations go to a teammate: There are times when Fin by Intercom simply keeps trying to answer the customer, even as they get more frustrated or Fin by Intercom is clearly going in loops. We have added guidance that improves it somewhat, but this still happens to an extent. At the end of the day, some queries just need a person, and I think Fin by Intercom should err on the side of caution in this case. No person is going to be unhappy to be offered to speak to a person if it's not needed. But they will get frustrated if it's not offered when needed.
  • Repeatable/reliable answers: This one is odd. So often, I have found that Fin by Intercom gives different answers to the same prompt or question, with no changes or updates to the content. This is frustrating as I can work hard one day trying to fine tune an answer Fin by Intercom will give (via content, guidance, and snippets), test the answer, and it is fine, then another test, it gives a different answer. It may be correct, but I don't understand why this happens.
  • Fin by Intercom knowledge sources: Sometimes the sources or information Fin by Intercom uses for an answer makes little to no sense. I have seen examples where Fin by Intercom has answered a query with a mainly unrelated source, where a help article which matches a lot of the keywords wasn't used or further down in the list. I feel like there needs to be better control/options in giving feedback to Fin by Intercom which articles or relevant to certain topics.
  • AI topics: Not purely Fin by Intercom AI, but AI topics, used in Fin by Intercom AI Analytics, could be better. I wish I could edit or amend them, as they're often a little vague or not useful on their own.
Read full review
Zendesk
  • Linking with a telephone, so the agent is only working on 1 channel at a time
  • More simplified way to create and use templates
  • Link users who may have provided us a new/different email from what we have on file for them
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Intercom
We have been and will be continuing our journey with Intercom and nothing too concerning has happened that I have experienced or heard of that has us on the edge yet. If it ever happens it will be something along the lines of "Outgrowing" the use of need of the platform.
Read full review
Zendesk
Due to staffing issues, we have temporarily stopped offering chat as an available channel. We're also interested in the best ways to integrate chat with our FAQs and AI to provide quick responses, either during off-hours or prior to speaking with a live agent. I've also found that reporting is rather limited where some of the interesting and useful data made available and visible during the chat cannot be pulled post-chat; it would be great to pull a high-level report so we can analyze this data.
Read full review
Usability
Intercom
It's very user-friendly and intuitive to use. We never get any comments from customers saying they don't understand how to use it or what is happening. However, we have had some issues where customers' previous conversation history was being wiped, and it was very difficult to tell if this was an Intercom issue or something on our side, so it took a lot of time to dig into.
Read full review
Zendesk
As mentioned previously, it's a clunky product that lacks user-friendliness. It feels old and behind the times compared to other products we have used. The inability to have a wrap-up time before a new chat comes in is also a big issue for our team.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Intercom
always there
Read full review
Zendesk
No answers on this topic
Performance
Intercom
works perfect
Read full review
Zendesk
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Intercom
Intercom is the premier customer support/engagement model and it definitely has one of the top tier customer support teams as well. I don't think I have ever waited more than 5 minutes to get the information I need or get help with an issue. They are incredible and I aim to model our customer service department after them.
Read full review
Zendesk
Getting assistance and/or troubleshooting anything with Zendesk can be quite frustrating. In my years of experience with Zednesk, I have almost never found the answer to my question without going through multiple articles, ultimately getting frustrated and reaching out to our contact for more assistance. So for a consumer, the support is not as relieving as Zendesk Chat is to our customers in getting the questions answered by us.
Read full review
Online Training
Intercom
Easy to know the learning path
Read full review
Zendesk
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Intercom
The implementation was surprisingly easy but we are having to adapt from our old process to work well with Intercom.
Read full review
Zendesk
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Intercom
Fin definitely stacks up pretty much at the same level when it comes to leveraging the input data KB to address customer queries. However reporting flexibility is something missing compared to the two mentioned platforms. The categorization of issues is much easier and accurate making it further analysis less time intensive. Why we selected Finis a difficult question for me to answer as the above platforms are from my previous company and when I moved to my current role Fin was already in place.
Read full review
Zendesk
Zendesk Chat is far more user friendly than some of the other competitors on the market. It has a very all the features that you require to ensure your customers are contacted in 'real time'. Its main tools include a live chat interface for quick communication, customisable chat widgets to fit your brand, mobile responsiveness for all devices, and canned responses for common questions. The platform can also start chats based on visitor actions, like time on a page or exit intent. A real must for any leading company
Read full review
Return on Investment
Intercom
  • With Fin, we achieved higher customer satisfaction and faster response times.
  • It saves time for our support team, allowing them to focus on more complex questions or issues.
  • It provides the opportunity for support staff to work at a more strategic level.
Read full review
Zendesk
  • Positive impact - Compared to our old system, this newly updated system provides features and functionality that has increased our agent productivity and provided customer insight like we've never had before. This has resulted in fewer hold times and higher customer satisfaction.
  • Negative impact - Our reporting team still struggles with obtaining the right information from time to time with the chats. This leads to loss of productivity and more resources dedicated to reporting.
  • Positive impact - Due to Zopim's embed, we are able to more successfully place them on the appropriate self-service portals and pages, reaching a larger audience, and being more readily available to answer our client's questions. This has resulted in an increase in our self-service portal usage, driving down the phone and email support channels, which in turn reduces support costs.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Fin by Intercom Screenshots

Screenshot of Fin, delivering conversational support experience to customers.Screenshot of where to monitor, analyze, and optimize Fin by spotting trends, filling content gaps, and fixing quality issues topic by topic.Screenshot of where to customize Fin's tone of voice, teach it support knowledge and policies, and configure how it handles complex tasks in over 45 languages.Screenshot of where to test answers, review the sources and settings that shape them, and get tailored recommendations to optimize performance.Screenshot of Fin, as it appears across email and live chat to phone, SMS, and social. Fin can answer any question, across any channel, any time.

Zendesk Chat Screenshots

Screenshot of How Zopim Chat Widget looks on the website.Screenshot of This is how the chat window looks like to your visitorsScreenshot of This is a screenshot of the visitor list.Screenshot of