Jirav, headquartered in San Francisco, aims to deliver smarter financials and faster insights, helping to understand where a business has been and predict where it will go. The system joins cloud-based Accounting, HR, CRM and billing data to automatically surface an interconnected model that is unique to a business. The solution helps eradicate spreadsheet errors, produce monthly reports that occur in real-time, and connected data enables teams to collaborate on multiple scenarios – bookings,…
$10,000
per year
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
OneStream is an enterprise finance platform that unifies financial and operational data, embeds AI for better decisions and productivity, and can extend to meet the evolving needs of businesses without adding technical debt. Presented as an operating system for modern Finance, it unifies core financial functions and empowering the CFO to become a critical driver of business strategy, innovation, and growth. It is a cloud-based platform that modernizes the Office of the CFO. The…
$0
Pricing
Jirav
OneStream
Editions & Modules
Starter
$10,000
per year
Pro
$15,000
per year
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Free
$0
Basic
$12
per month billed annually
Basic
$15
per month
Standard
$32
per month billed annually
Professional
$39
per month billed annually
Standard
$39
per month
Professional
$49
per month
Enterprise
$83
per month billed annually
Enterprise
$99
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jirav
OneStream
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
The solution is only for Enterprises. Pricing for software is based on number of total users and one user gets all software functionality. Implementation would be based on what business problem or problems the solution will be used to solve, such as financial consolidation and reporting or planning or account reconciliations, etc.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jirav
OneStream
Considered Both Products
Jirav
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Jirav
Fathom was the cheapest and most basic as an add-on directly to Quickbooks Online Plus, but you lose functionality with Fathom if you use Quickbooks Online Advanced (QBOA). The main loss of functionality for me was the lack of multiple department reporting, which was absolutely …
Specifically talking with OneStream is very useful and considering easy to access more standardized and help to easy to navigate. Most common is user friendly and best financial planning tool which I ever seen! Compare with other tools OneStream provide best excel integration …
OneStream appears to be the best-in-class solution. Still, SAP Analytics Cloud integrates so seamlessly with SAP that it's tough to justify going "out of the family" when you're already deeply integrated with SAP.
For me, the choice for OneStream is due to the amount that can be configured and pre-configured which allows us to create standard and reusable content. This speeds up our service delivery.
OneStream is much more robust, has functionality around creating financial statements in Common Currency which other systems we used could not handle. OneStream has a really good structure around it. We believe it's a much better fit for a Global company of our size. We're just …
Compared to some of the options we researched, OneStream is a much more modern product in the way it combines the different capabilities of intense calculations, highly customizable dashboards, great narrative reporting as well as the much loved Excel plug-in capability. We …
The performance gains with OneStream alone are a reason to switch from Oracle, but the versatility of the application is the icing on the cake. Versatility is added by the additional dimensions, the customizable dashboards where you can plan for Revenue and Expenses, People …
OneStream gave me my life back. Working in outdated Essbase for closing the books & Forecasting it would take us 10-12 days working 12 - 16 hour days. 2020 we went to OneStream. I have not worked a weekend since, closing and forecasting went to 5-7 days working 8-9 hours a …
IBM Analytics seemed quite competitive. OneStream was selected because it has the consolidation and planning functionalities in the same cube. Overall cost for implementation and use were lower. Lucanet and Anaplan seemed to have less flexibility to adapt the planning …
OneStream had a lot more capabilities as an all rounder tool that could leverage Actuals, forecast planning plus the other features like Tax and Transaction matching. OneStream also offer a Marketplace where a lot of bolt on modules are available for free with only some …
OneStream is the only one that seamlessly integrates close/consolidation with budget and planning in one tool. It integrates easily with ERPs and supports full financial statement AND management reporting
OneStream offers a comprehensive toolset to facilitate most modeling requirements. Our primary focus for selecting onestream was to facilitate a fast, robust and fully auditable consolidation tool that would meet our growing business requirements. OneStream has delivered on all …
OneStream is able to integrate faster and has a broader scope of newer technologies which makes it interact with other systems much more efficiently and seamlessly.
OneStream combines functionality that is normally spread over multiple solutions with other vendors, and provides an integration that previously could only be achieved via complicated technical structures to integrate and combine solutions for actual reporting and planning on …
OneStream single unified platform capabilities are outstanding. The flexibility around OneStream has allowed us to mold OneStream into our business model, whereas, I felt SAP forced us into their model. As an analyst, the reporting capabilities are my bread and butter and they …
I think HFM is very good at consolidation as well, but it is less flexible, not a platform, not as modern (look-and-feel), not as fast. In my opinion, OneStream stands out in the platform thinking. You have one licence which you can use for consolidation, tax, FP&A and even ESG …
OneStream is still being further developed and improved. Their marketplace provides some nice pre-built solutions. These are not as common with competitors. OneStream has a helpdesk that customers can reach out to instead of going through a middle man like consultants or …
OneStream is quite updated comparing with BPC. It has instant updates and it has more features like quick view, cubeview, dashboards, BI, Task scheduler. It's good for businesses to use it with a wide range of options to make their business decisions in short times. OneStream …
OneStream is the overall clear winner against HFM. There are a few things HFM does better (a couple things in Smart View), but it just doesn't have as much capability. The single, integrated platform that OneStream is provides a massive upgrade from HFM.
Hyperion HFM was a previous market leader in the EPM space but the OneStream FX platofrm far surpasses its offerings from Dashboarding, Workflow, Planning and forecasting all in one platform which under Hyperion was bundled in separate modules.
I feel that Jirav would be best suited for companies with less than 75 employees that need a more robust software than Fathom (Quickbooks Onlne integrated FP&A tool based in Australia) that is very customizable, with simple revenue modeling, few personnel changes every month, few departments, no multi currency, and need collaboration only with top-level personnel. I think Jirav is a product that is being highly recommended in the accounting industry for outsourced accounting firms, but accounting only looks at historical information and there needs to more finance industry influence, approval, and input so they can improve their product.
OneStream is best suited for medium to large companies that find themselves doing a wide variety of manual processes during their financial close cycle will get the most benefit. That does mean a lot of change so there has to be very intentional communication around change management in order to get the buy in that is necessary for success.
Jirav integrates well with Quickbooks Online (QBO), and I like how you can easily customize the reporting presentation by combining GL accounts and showing more or less details as needed for managerial reporting
I like that Jirav is browser-based and that I can easily share reports with internal and external parties for comments
I feel more confident using Jirav than I do with Excel because there is more data validation, and some notifications will appear if there are errors in the model
The sales capacity model and ramping employees schedule that their implementation / professional services team built for us works well overall (with some limitations)
Ideally, having a direct integration into Jirav would be great for all our data. However, some of our software didn't have a direct integration, so I was glad that Jirav offered the ability to use a connected Google Sheet that lets me input data that can be imported directly into the system
Consolidation engine is powerful, we have around 500 entities translating from multiple source currencies into a common currency at good speed.
We leverage the Flash and Quarterly forecast providing users with pre seeded data so they only need to make tweaks rather then filling in a lot of manual forms.
We use Transaction matching for processing a lot of intercompany matching invoices from the ERP systems which helps end users a lot. Data is fed in from source ERPS and TXM generates the auto matches based on criteria provided.
We have a custom Tax module which we use to pull in tax entries from the consolidation side and this gives the Tax teams starting position for their tax calculations and enables them to also do a quarterly forecast estimate.
OneStream has great dashboarding capabilities for a whole range of use cases from charts and graphs, to drill-back data to running even steps that users can execute without having access to the source code/rules in the background!
At times, I feel that Jirav is too customizable. It would be great if they could tailor the system to be more industry-specific. For example, if the system could provide standard formulas for SaaS industry metrics already within the system, then that would have saved me a ton of time with having to create the metrics myself. The formula creation for metrics is quite tedious as well because you can only do simple calculations, such as A + B or A x C. You cannot do A + B + C or A x B x C.
I struggle with the way they have their staff planning set up because I have to reimport an Excel every month with all the changes (new hires, terminations, pay changes), and the changes appear to be retroactive on reports, which doesn't make sense if someone receives a raise or pay change during the year. It would be much easier for planning for bookings if they could add a column for quota by salesperson.
If there are notifications of errors in the model, then the notifications will continue to present themselves after I resolve the issue. It would be nice if I could clear out notifications I know are not relevant anymore. I also still find errors in the system that I would have expected the system to notify me about, such as Assumptions that are set up but they are not included in any formulas, so I should delete that assumption to prevent anyone from thinking changing that assumption will impact the model.
There is some functionality for sharing reports and information, but there is not enough granularity in security settings to allow me to share certain information easily. For example, if I want to share information with managers to manage their departments' budget, but also not see their boss' compensation, then it takes some work to set that up. Or, if I want to share a report with a recruiter of planned headcount and salary, then I need to export it to Excel first and delete Actual headcount and salary, so they don't see current employees' compensation (including the person's boss' salary).
Customer and vendor names do not import, only the totals, so if you look at Actuals vs Plan, the actuals will show a total figure and the plan will show detail, creating the need for an external and manual reconciliation
There is no multi-currency available
Scenario analysis can be difficult to do quickly. For example, if I want to see the plan with planned hires and without planned hires, then I would need to create two separate plans, individually select and delete the planned hires in one plan and keep then in another plan, which is time-consuming
Using Google Sign-In causes the system to time-out frequently for me, so I get kicked out of the system and have to log back in. If I have multiple tabs of Jirav open, then re-logging in sometimes doesn't bring me back to where I was originally at.
You can export reports to Excel, but there are no formulas of the calculations, which makes it more difficult to understand how calculations are being performed unless you look in the browser and dig into the calculations. This also might make it more difficult if you decide to go to another software in the future since you may need to start from scratch in the next software
Seasonality has been difficult to model. For example, the way our model is set up, I can use an assumption for Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4. However, if I update Q3 for this year, then it also updates Q3 of all subsequent years, which I don't want. A more complex model and additional maintenance would be needed to accomplish more accurate seasonality planning
Provide some more prebuilt dashboards that serve as reference examples for specific topics, to allow users to gain an idea of all that is possible
Provide some clear cut explanations to explain some of the standard concepts, to allow companies that start their implementation to gain a quick understanding of how things work
Currently we are using OneStream with people 80 - 100 to load the PL, BS , Forecast budget and People Planning. OneStream give us more visibility on trend and way forward thinking. Thanks to OneStream for the tool which helps the business in growing way. Thinking of innovation OneStream is right path.
Overall usability as an end-user is very easy. There are more people in the system getting information now than the prior platform used. People are gathering their information quicker as well. From an administrator standpoint, there are fewer glitches and issues than the prior platform. This is very good.
OneStream support is focused on the infrastructure. Which means mainly when there issues with accessing to the system, they will be able to help. When the question is to much leaning towards functional it really becomes billable. The other issue is that the response time is not optimal. There is a lot of pingpong of messages and the time between the message can sometimes be long. Sometimes this result into a simple ticket to be taking days before it is closed.
onestream offers a range of training. I have attended a number of trainings. During the trainings a vast amount of information is discussed. The trainings also include exercises. The speed of the training is pretty high. When reviewing the training material afterwards, I found that the material is not complete as reference as it relies also very much on the verbal explanation and elaboration.
Fathom was the cheapest and most basic as an add-on directly to QuickBooks Online Plus, but you lose functionality with Fathom if you use QuickBooks Online Advanced (QBOA). The main loss of functionality for me was the lack of multiple department reporting, which was absolutely necessary for my analysis. Jirav was half the price of Moscaic.tech, but I've heard Mosaic has standard metrics for the SaaS-industry, which is appealing after going through the tedious process of setting up metrics in Jirav. QBOA has additional reporting than QBO Plus, but not enough robust features for planning and modeling. PlaceCPM is Salesforce-based and a I felt having a strong Salesforce admin that can great reports made their unnecessary, and I feel like most of the time you need a Salesforce admin just to run Salesforce. Cube, Vena and OnPlan are spreadsheet-based, but I don't want to use spreadsheets. Prophix, Board and Anaplan seem outdated. Workday was more than what I needed
OneStream is much more robust, has functionality around creating financial statements in Common Currency which other systems we used could not handle. OneStream has a really good structure around it. We believe it's a much better fit for a Global company of our size. We're just scratching a surface of what the system capabilities are.
Customers have moved from multiple EPM systems as well as multiple EPM applications to OneStream.
Their ROI has been quite high as lesser admins are required, no need to move data back & forth, no need for an additional dashboarding / BI tool, once a user is on OneStream can leverage it for more than 50+ use cases at no additional license cost.
Automation, direct integration, scheduling, complex calculation capabilities, all help to further improve ROI and free up the time for the team to do value-adding tasks.
Last but not the least is the confidence on the numbers is much higher.
