Jitterbit vs. Planview Hub

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jitterbit
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Jitterbit is a cloud integration technology for cloud, social or mobile apps. It provides accessibility for non-technical users, including easily creating API’s and data transformation scripts within the integrations.
$1,000
per month
Planview Hub
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Planview Hub provides scalable, sophisticated near real-time integrations to help IT leaders and their teams eliminate inefficiencies.N/A
Pricing
JitterbitPlanview Hub
Editions & Modules
Jitterbit
$100.00
Starting Price Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JitterbitPlanview Hub
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JitterbitPlanview Hub
Features
JitterbitPlanview Hub
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Jitterbit
7.2
12 Ratings
11% below category average
Planview Hub
8.0
2 Ratings
0% below category average
Pre-built connectors8.012 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Connector modification7.211 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration7.012 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Data quality services8.09 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Data security features7.09 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Monitoring console6.011 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Best Alternatives
JitterbitPlanview Hub
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JitterbitPlanview Hub
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(25 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(9 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
JitterbitPlanview Hub
Likelihood to Recommend
Jitterbit
This is a great tool for bringing data out of your locked, internal systems and getting it into the cloud. It meshes well with Salesforce and is fairly easy to use, helping the transition from other older, more complex tools into a more modern environment. It has lots of competition in this space and some are better than others, but if your data is straight forward and you know it well, Jitterbit will get the job done. If you are not as close or comfortable with your data and need to do some wildly complex migrations, there might be better packages out there for you.
Read full review
Planview
Planview TaskTop Hub is very well suited to implement the integrations to synchronise data such as requirement, task, bugs. We have very good experience with the integration between Jama and Jira as well as between two Jama instances. In the context test management, related to Test steps in a test case, it's quite complicated. Test Case synchronization between two Jama instances works with Steps. But we aren't able to implement the synchronisation of Test Cases including Steps to such Plugin of Jira like Xephyr.
Read full review
Pros
Jitterbit
  • UI is super easy to understand with a low learning curve so admins can figure it out and maintain it without breaking anything.
  • It's FREE! There's a paid version too but I like that you can use most of the features for free and they're not pushy with buying.
  • There's a great user community that you can google and ask any questions. Most problems I've encountered have been posted and answered already.
Read full review
Planview
  • Allows for one- vs bi-directional field flow which is useful per segment
  • Allows for the relationship mapping of Parent/Child cards
  • Allows for customization of mapped fields
Read full review
Cons
Jitterbit
  • Migrating operations from QA to Production work well for initial deployment, however, when migrating an update to an existing job to production, sometimes certain project items are duplicated. This is not the end of the world... the duplicates can be removed, but would be nice if it was not required.
  • I have not found a way to trap under-the-covers SOAP errors (for example, when a query you are running against Salesforce takes too long). You get a warning error in the operation log that the job only pulled a "partial" file, but it does not fail.
Read full review
Planview
  • I'd like to see more robust reporting capabilities available from the UI.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Jitterbit
I have been evaluating other tools as a continuous improvement practice. I would like something that would be easier to use for a non-technical user. I work for a small organization and have no back-up for Jitterbit if something happens to me. We don't have the technically savvy employees to understand it.
Read full review
Planview
Planview TaskTop Hub supports our use cases. I think its continuous development goes in the right direction.
Read full review
Usability
Jitterbit
No answers on this topic
Planview
A great integration tool, which comes with a wide range of supported end tools. Planview TaskTop Hub works with an integration concept that maximizes the scalability and flexibility of integrations across more than just two tools. For example, from our experience, we started with the integration between Jama Connect and Jira. We were able to extend our integration concept to a new tool, Pro Cloud Server, by ourselves. The element was synced within 10 minutes.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Jitterbit
No answers on this topic
Planview
We're hosting Planview TaskTop Hub by ourselves. The availability was good until now. A part of that, we have a strict plan for the quality control on any update of both Hub and End tools to avoid as much as possibily any disruptions.
Read full review
Performance
Jitterbit
No answers on this topic
Planview
Planview TaskTop Hub does generate traffic for some end tools. It is still in an acceptable range. For certain kind of retry to resolve issue in synchronizing relationships, an additional manual attention was required.
Read full review
Support Rating
Jitterbit
They have some of the best support of any software vendor that we use. They always get our issues resolved quickly
Read full review
Planview
I was considering giving a rating between 9 and 10. Overall, the support has been very good so far. However, I have noticed that the members of the support team have varying levels of know-how about Planview TaskTop Hub. When a ticket about a complex technical issue reaches a member such as Christoph T., Sr. Customer Engineer, the analysis is done thoroughly, and a sustainable solution is provided. With other members of the support team, the experience might be different.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Jitterbit
No answers on this topic
Planview
We've received a good, in-deep training from Christoph T. during the implementation phase.
Read full review
Online Training
Jitterbit
No answers on this topic
Planview
The integration documentation was sufficient.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Jitterbit
No answers on this topic
Planview
We had a very good collaboration with the enabling team from Tasktop in 2018. The enablement program was adequately structured, starting with building an integration concept based on use cases of the synchronized data. The training provided a good foundation for us to operate and maintain the tool. The tool administration and architecture were straightforward.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Jitterbit
Evaluated Dell Boomi and Celigo as alternatives prior to purchasing Jitterbit. We went with Jitterbit at that time because we could handle all changes ourselves without any assistance from Jitterbit, and we liked their size and nimbleness. Dell Boomi was too big for us, and Celigo at that time did not have a self-service model. Every change had to go through them (although that has since changed). We were not in a position to be able to wait for someone to make changes for us given the rate of change within the business.
Read full review
Planview
Jira Align does not synch items outside of JIRA and Azure Dev Ops; TT Hub is specifically utilized to address connections to various other SDLC application.
Read full review
Scalability
Jitterbit
No answers on this topic
Planview
We don't need to deploy Planview TaskTop Hub in other units but we could extend the integration to cover the new data, new data type and new projects.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Jitterbit
  • The time it takes to connect systems has reduced by orders of magnitude. Previously, we would custom-develop connectors between various systems and they would all be managed by different vendors. With Jitterbit speed-to-deploy and the efficiency gained by managing all connections in one dashboard has been the greatest piece of the ROI.
Read full review
Planview
  • We track monthly updates and each month there are typically over 30,000 updates being made which we know is saving time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planview Hub Screenshots

Screenshot of Monitor ROI and usage to measure integration's impact on the business.Screenshot of Visualize the integration landscapeScreenshot of Pre-built connectors for over sixty toolsScreenshot of Model-based integration is scalable