Juicer is a social media aggregator that curates social media content from different social channels such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram into one simple feed that can be embedded anywhere. The tool allows users to organize content into one platform and introduce visitors to a company's social side without having them navigate off the website. The user's feed is updated daily or hourly depending upon plan selected. Within the Juicer dashboard users can add multiple feed sources…
$0
per month
Kapost
Score7 out of 10
N/A
Upland Kapost helps you create and distribute meaningful content to support the buyer journey for B2B companies.
$1
per month
Pricing
Juicer
Kapost
Editions & Modules
Small Plan
$0.00
per month
Medium Plan
$19.00
per month
Large Plan
$99.00
per month
Enterprise Plan
$199.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Juicer
Kapost
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
**Small Plan Features: 2 source accounts, 1 embeddable social media feed, pulls in new posts every 24 hours, Juicer branding
**Medium Plan Features: 5 source accounts, 1 embeddable social media feed, pulls in new posts every hour, moderation and filtering tools, no Juicer branding
**Large Plan Features: 15 source accounts, 3 embeddable social media feeds, pulls in new posts every 10 minutes, analytics, moderation, and filter tools, no Juicer branding
**Enterprise Plan: customized based on user need, price varies
**Campaign Plan: Quick updates best for events, price varies
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Juicer
Kapost
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Juicer and Kapost
Feature
Juicer
-
Ratings
Kapost
8.2
9 Ratings
5% above category average
Ideation
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Approval workflows
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Content collaboration
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Content calendar
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Network for content licensing/production
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Juicer and Kapost
Feature
Juicer
-
Ratings
Kapost
8.0
9 Ratings
2% above category average
Content hub
00 Ratings
7.18 Ratings
Forms / Gated content
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Embedded CTAs
00 Ratings
7.93 Ratings
Content distribution
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Content promotion
00 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Content automation
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Juicer and Kapost
Juicer is great for any campaign, hashtag, or event-related website. For example, we've created this website for a friend's event (the "Pirate Summit", and it looks like this https://www.juicer.io/pirate-summit). Also, artists use it a lot, for example, Bon Jovi's official site at https://www.juicer.io/bonjovi. You can also build a lot of stuff around it, and just keep Juicer's aggregated social media feed in an iFrame. Juicer is less well suited if you want to enable actions from social media, e.g. buying a physical product. In these cases, classic e-commerce shops are better suited.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Kapost has potential to be a great asset in small and large orgs. If you're not producing a great deal of content, or coordinating across a large team, there's still tremendous value, but it scales as your org scales because it makes it easier to coordinate and manage large teams and large content archives.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Juicer allows me the opportunity to set it and forget it so that I can use my valuable time to focus on other things.
Juicer has allowed us to seamlessly ensure that our social media feed can be found on our website and that it will stay up to date at any given moment.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Filtering: If you make the most out of your custom details and custom fields, you can gain newfound access to materials that may have long been lost in the ether. It's really easy for us, for instance, to see all of our videos at once. Or everything targeting a certain buying stage. Or you can keyword search to see everything on one topic.
Workflows: It's really nice to lay out "who sees what when" in a digital way, because everyone involved on an asset can easily see what stage things are at. You can also set deadlines to tasks, which seems a bit more firm than a casual email, because you can visually see how meeting your deadline fits within the whole timeline.
Calendars: The calendar feature is nice for us because we have a blog, so we can see when everything is (supposed) to go live. It's easy to see when I, as a copy editor, should be expecting work, so I can align my day accordingly. Way better than the old-fashioned "mental note" system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Social media distribution needs improvement. Specifically a calendar for planned Tweets and a better way to schedule multiple shares of the same content.
System performance is somewhat slow.
Should be an easier way to make changes, like adding custom fields or publication destinations, to all content types, rather than one at a time.
We are using some other systems that might have replaced Kapost, but none of them had the workflow functionality we were looking for. So, we're sticking with Kapost for now.
The calendar view is a great feature and so are the custom views. It is relatively easy to see a clear view of what content the user is responsible for and then the due dates associated to it. The ability to create and update workflows for the team is easy to navigate and keeps us on track.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The reputation of the product matches up to its reputation as one of the leaders in the space. I love that you can share and access content at your fingertips from anywhere. The downside is that it does not have the prettiest interface but you can get over this with its functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I haven’t had the first-hand opportunity to try other platforms. Juicer was already being used on our other websites and therefore we’re now utilizing it for the Foundation.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workfront has a lot of great features, but Kapost was the right tool for what we needed at the time. With a team of our size, we had to make sure we weren't biting off more than we could chew and the project never got off the ground. We had to be thoughtful with how we rolled it out.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info