TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Jupyter Notebook

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AJupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…N/A

    Visual Studio Test Professional

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AAn add-on for the Visual Studio IDE, Visual Studio Test Professional subscription helps teams drive quality and speed. It includes test case management and collaboration features that streamline quality control and support continuous delivery.

    $2,169

    for the first year (renews at $869)

    Pricing
    Jupyter NotebookVisual Studio Test Professional
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Jupyter NotebookVisual Studio Test Professional
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Jupyter NotebookVisual Studio Test Professional
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    23 Answers
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    17 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    20 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    Jupyter NotebookVisual Studio Test Professional
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Jupyter Notebook and Visual Studio Test Professional
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    9.0
    22 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Visual Studio Test Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
    MDM Integration7.415 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of Jupyter Notebook and Visual Studio Test Professional
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    7.0
    22 Ratings
    19% below category average
    Visual Studio Test Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Visualization6.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Jupyter Notebook and Visual Studio Test Professional
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    9.5
    22 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Visual Studio Test Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Transformations10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Encryption8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
    Built-in Processors9.314 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Jupyter Notebook and Visual Studio Test Professional
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    9.3
    22 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Visual Studio Test Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning9.218 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of Jupyter Notebook and Visual Studio Test Professional
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    10.0
    20 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Visual Studio Test Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Flexible Model Publishing Options10.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls10.019 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Jupyter NotebookVisual Studio Test Professional
    Small Businesses
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Anaconda
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    IBM Watson Studio
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Jupyter NotebookVisual Studio Test Professional
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (23 ratings)
    7.0
    (15 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.0
    (10 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.5
    (10 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Jupyter NotebookVisual Studio Test Professional
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    I've created a number of daisy chain notebooks for different workflows, and every time, I create my workflows with other users in mind. Jupiter Notebook makes it very easy for me to outline my thought process in as granular a way as I want without using innumerable small. inline comments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It would be well suited if we used it with Azure DevOps as we can effortlessly integrate the test cases and even stories or tasks to stay on track with our work. Those test cases can even be reused across multiple projects. Using any other third-party tools, such as Jira, can be less appropriate, as it's not a Microsoft tool, and its capabilities will be limited.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Simple and elegant code writing ability. Easier to understand the code that way.
    • The ability to see the output after each step.
    • The ability to use ton of library functions in Python.
    • Easy-user friendly interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Availability of the desktop client or the web interface. The web interface being the favorite and providing a better experience.
    • It enables you to write unit tests with so much ease.
    • Allows the recording and repeating of manual tests
    • It can be set up for collaboration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
    • Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • The user community of the Visual Studio Test product is weak. For instant problems with this product, it is necessary to quickly reach the source of the error.
    • Licence fees need to be more reasonable. License prices need to be reduced so that they can easily compete with free testing tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It is very usable if you are familiar with Visual Studio to begin with. If you are new to the interface, it can be a long ramp up period for Testers not used to the GUI. There is always the web option which seems to be more intuitive for many Testers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Visual Studio Test Professional is backed up by the full support of the Microsoft Corporation. That means twenty-four/seven customer support by quality, highly-trained professionals who understand every possible issue that you have experienced before. They are nice, efficient, and highly professional. I recommend them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better business decisions and save cost to the company. It stacks up better as we know Python is more widely used than R in the industry and can be learnt easily. Unlike PyCharm jupyter notebooks can be used to make documentations and exported in a variety of formats.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The visual Studio Test tool is faster than other tools. Since the development and testing processes are in one tool, it is more profitable in terms of cost. It is more inconvenient to write a test case in DevOps.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
    • Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
    • Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • One of the positive ROIs of Visual Studios is the fact that it makes producing our work at a quick rate, things like Intellisense make our work get produced at a much higher rate which is good for our return of investment.
    • Testing by the developers has increased by 23%, we now take the time to actually test our product before we send it to our QA people.
    • I am not aware of any negative ROI aspects to our company that have been found.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots