JW Player vs. Kaltura

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JW Player
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
JW Player (or JWP) is a video platform boasting 40,000 broadcasters, publishers, and other video-driven brands whose business relies on video as users. It provides these companies with a way to accelerate and scale their video strategy and is a video platform that can be used to stream video, engage audiences on any screen, and monetize content.N/A
Kaltura
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Kaltura, headquartered in New York, offers enterprise or large scale video storage, streaming, and distribution supporting a variety of purposes such as streaming, enterprise video portal, interactive video and virtual classroom, or podcasting.N/A
Pricing
JW PlayerKaltura
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JW PlayerKaltura
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
JW PlayerKaltura
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
8.6
2 Ratings
18% above category average
Kaltura
7.5
5 Ratings
4% above category average
Support for advertisements9.12 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Video SEO8.12 Ratings7.33 Ratings
Lead generation00 Ratings5.72 Ratings
Video personalization00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
eCommerce00 Ratings5.72 Ratings
Integration to Marketing Automation00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
7.8
3 Ratings
11% below category average
Kaltura
8.3
7 Ratings
5% below category average
Video access controls9.01 Ratings8.57 Ratings
User management9.01 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Video link sharing7.03 Ratings8.07 Ratings
External video6.02 Ratings8.37 Ratings
Internal video00 Ratings8.76 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
7.0
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Kaltura
7.8
6 Ratings
7% below category average
Player customization2.03 Ratings8.35 Ratings
Embedded videos6.03 Ratings8.36 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls10.03 Ratings8.76 Ratings
Mobile compatibility10.03 Ratings5.76 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
1.0
3 Ratings
153% below category average
Kaltura
6.4
5 Ratings
16% below category average
Per viewer tracking1.01 Ratings6.45 Ratings
Per video tracking1.02 Ratings6.45 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard1.03 Ratings6.75 Ratings
A/B testing00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Streaming quality reports00 Ratings6.43 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
8.6
3 Ratings
1% above category average
Kaltura
8.1
7 Ratings
5% below category average
On-Demand video6.03 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Live streaming10.01 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Video upload & format support10.03 Ratings8.37 Ratings
Video library / File management7.03 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Video portal10.01 Ratings8.56 Ratings
Impact of streaming on network00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Video Platform Integrations
Comparison of Video Platform Integrations features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
-
Ratings
Kaltura
7.3
4 Ratings
14% above category average
Integration to Salesforce.com00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Integration to Marketo00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Integration to Eloqua00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Integration to LMS00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Video Engagement
Comparison of Video Engagement features of Product A and Product B
JW Player
-
Ratings
Kaltura
7.0
3 Ratings
14% below category average
Audience polling00 Ratings6.42 Ratings
Audience Q&A / Live chat00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Video comments00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Best Alternatives
JW PlayerKaltura
Small Businesses
Wistia
Wistia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Wistia
Wistia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Flipgrid
Flipgrid
Score 1.6 out of 10
Flipgrid
Flipgrid
Score 1.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Panopto
Panopto
Score 7.6 out of 10
Panopto
Panopto
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JW PlayerKaltura
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(4 ratings)
7.8
(11 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
6.3
(3 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
JW PlayerKaltura
Likelihood to Recommend
JW Player
JW Player has flexible plans that won't cost you a lot of money. If you are a startup, JW offers a variety of plans that will suit your specific needs and grow with you as your company grows. You do not need to be a video expert to understand how to upload a video, which allows nearly anyone in the office to do it.
Read full review
Kaltura
Kaltura is an excellent tool IF you have a large library of content. It can be pretty pricey so if you are early in launching an online program you may be better off waiting a few years until you've amassed a large enough catalog to warrant the investment in such a tool. The tool is best purchased by a University or company-wide vs having a single department try to find the budget for it. The unlimited plan pays for itself in most cases if you go this route. Secondly, you must be willing to invest time and resources into on-going training for your faculty and staff, especially for those who wish to create their own media and use the quizzing features.
Read full review
Pros
JW Player
  • Responsive HTML5
  • Provides share functionality built into the player
  • Platform use enables playlist functionality and playlist players which can be customized or versioned for specific uses
  • Videos uploaded to the JW Platform automatically provide multiple image frame options for selecting video thumbnail
Read full review
Kaltura
  • Very easy to use interface for uploading videos or capturing a screen recording. There are very few clicks required to get the media up and running. The video conversion process that happens on the back-end is fast and provides videos in device agnostic formats.
  • Integrates well with other systems, such as our Moodle LMS. This extends the capabilities of the LMS and also allows us to keep video/multimedia content organized in a central location (the KMC).
  • Kaltura can be connected to various processes within your organization. For example, we have a system in place that allows a video lecture in a classroom to be uploaded to Kaltura in a very easy manner.
  • User/role management is very important as some people on campus have more privileges to publish content than do others. We have Kaltura connected to our Single Sign-On solution for authentication and we can assign roles to specific people within the Kaltura software.
Read full review
Cons
JW Player
  • Definitely missing the ability (in and easy way) to have clickable links in the video.
  • Analytics is a little cumbersome and not very user-friendly.
Read full review
Kaltura
  • As it relates to the LMS integration, we would like to see improved workflow. But that may be just as much a Canvas issue as a Kaltura issue.
  • I would like to see the ability to add inline, anchored comments to the video timeline.
  • We are seeing issues with compatibility with certain browsers - especially Chrome. The faster Kaltura can move away from Flash the better.
  • The capture appliance (CaptureSpace Lite) needs to be reconsidered. It's not intutive enough.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
JW Player
Just made the decision to renew given demonstrated improvements being made to the platform to expand compatibility for its player use on devices such as Apple TV, as well as improvements made recently to its JW Platform Dashboard
Read full review
Kaltura
The choice to renew our subscription does not belong to us, though we are able to provide input. We are aware of competitive products who have matured in the past three years, and we are aware now of alternatives to conventional plugin usage (LTI).
Read full review
Usability
JW Player
Reliability and compatibility on a majority of platforms. Would have received a 10 except recent versions of browsers such as Firefox are now defaulting against Flash components and thus prompting approval from users BEFORE loading which is a HUGE obstacle to an effective user experience thus creating concerns by end-users unnecessarily and risking that they will NOT accept the prompts, thus leaving unable to view video content hosted using the JW Player. Assurances by JW support suggest they will resolve this, so we'll see...
Read full review
Kaltura
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
JW Player
Support is reasonable. I from time to time have made suggestions on improvements that would be nice to see (like the ability to have a clickable link within the video - that is easy to create, without tons of coding) and it seems as though I never see it happen or get much response to "suggestions" to upgrade the software. The good news, other than a few things as I mentioned above, overall, I don't have many "technical issues" in the platform, which is a good thing. On occasion, I have seen some "issues" with the delivery of the video, but it has been pretty scarce. So it is dependable.
Read full review
Kaltura
The first line support agents seldom are able to diagnose or troubleshoot any problems that we have. These agents simply open support tickets in their system which are escalated to a foreign level 2 support agent which creates at least a day delay between reporting a problem and getting initial feedback. Any back-and-forth questions add at least another day delay.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
JW Player
One of the primary features promoted by JW Platform is its SEO definition. However, there did not seem to be a way to integrate that data to our platform if selected thus only leaving the benefits of that data to be established on the individual video page hosted by JW Platform, which isn't useful in the end to the client value we are trying to deliver for our VideoproFile.net solution
Read full review
Kaltura
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
JW Player
JW had more player options, a better/more intuitive user interface, was altogether faster both in rendering the uploaded videos and in time to load on the web page. The integration with OpenX for pre-roll was faster and easier than with Brightcove, and lastly, they offered a great price for service.
Read full review
Kaltura
Kaltura was the best option given the sheer volume of people we needed to support digitally. Others were better in their own regard, but due to limitations in number of attendees or sessions, Kaltura was the best option
Read full review
Return on Investment
JW Player
  • JW Player has was less expensive (without sacrificing quality) than our previous video platform so the ROI was instant.
  • We were easily able to add a variety of video advertising options including pre-roll, mid-roll and post-roll.
  • The quality and consistancy of the look of the video has enabled us to grow our video views by well over 100% since starting with JW.
Read full review
Kaltura
  • Managing video content with the KMC has greatly reduced the amount of hours previously needed to manage.
  • User issues ie: uploading video, viewing video has been greatly reduced.
  • Increased user engagement with using video in LMS courses. We currently have 6,929 videos on our system. Last month , 2/1/14, 17,623 videos were viewed at least 75% of the way through.
Read full review
ScreenShots