Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.
N/A
Kontent.ai
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Kontent.ai is a headless CMS that helps content-driven organizations manage their content. Bringing greater speed, control, and governance to every aspect of content management, Kontent.ai helps them to publish better content faster. Kontent.ai is designed to accommodate every type of content workflow without sacrificing speed, compliance, or results. The vendor states Kontent.ai customers—including Elanco, Zurich Insurance, PPG, WebMD…
$30,000
per year (starting price)
Pricing
Contentstack
Kontent.ai
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Flexible Plan
30,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contentstack
Kontent.ai
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contentstack
Kontent.ai
Features
Contentstack
Kontent.ai
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.4
11 Ratings
10% below category average
Kontent.ai
8.2
1 Ratings
0% below category average
Role-based user permissions
7.411 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.5
10 Ratings
4% below category average
Kontent.ai
9.1
2 Ratings
16% above category average
API
8.19 Ratings
9.12 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
6.98 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
8.1
12 Ratings
4% above category average
Kontent.ai
8.5
2 Ratings
8% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Admin section
7.712 Ratings
8.62 Ratings
Page templates
7.68 Ratings
00 Ratings
Library of website themes
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
6.69 Ratings
7.72 Ratings
Publishing workflow
6.810 Ratings
9.12 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application.
Really easy integration to all of our services and apps. Delivery API libraries make the integration really fast. On the other hand, I miss the option to use SSO (Single Sign-On) with the Professional version of the Kentico Kontent. However, it is included in the Enterprise package.
In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related
In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion.
Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice.
They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with.
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack
Unified access to the same content without the need to duplicate it across multiple solutions. We do not need to set up a complicated infrastructure to start using the Kentico Kontent.