Lansweeper vs. Qualys VMDR
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Lansweeper | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Lansweeper helps organizations see, understand, and make confident decisions about their technology estate across IT, OT, IoT, and Cloud. Lansweeper automatically discovers and inventories every asset: hardware, software, and user—then connects that data to insights about usage, lifecycle, and risk. This is to create what the vendor describes as Technology Asset Intelligence (TAI): a trusted foundation of knowledge that turns raw inventory data into clear, actionable… | $2,868 per year (includes 2000 assets) |
Qualys VMDR | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | Qualys VMDR 2.0 with TruRisk gives enterprises visibility and insight into cyber risk exposure with the goal of making it easy to prioritize vulnerabilities, assets, or groups of assets based on business risk. Security teams can take action to mitigate risk, helping the business measure its true risk, and track risk reduction over time. | N/A |
| Lansweeper | Qualys VMDR | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Lansweeper | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 10 Answers | 86% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| Lansweeper | Qualys VMDR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT Asset Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lansweeper | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | KACE Asset Management Appliance Score8.9 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | KACE Systems Management Appliance Score8.9 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Lansweeper | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Usability | 9.0 | 8.4 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.9 | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Configurability | - | 9.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 9.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Lansweeper | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Lansweeper Screenshots |










