Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Litera Draft
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Litera Desktop is a single toolbar designed to include everything a lawyer needs to draft documents and create an integrated, seamless experience that ensures user adoption and consolidates vendors.N/A
Loopio
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Loopio is a Toronto-based RFP response software provider that helps companies streamline their process for RFPs, DDQs, and Security Questionnaires. Loopio’s RFP response software is for RFIs, Security Questionnaires, DDQs, and sales proposals.N/A
Responsive
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.N/A
Pricing
Litera DraftLoopioResponsive
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Litera DraftLoopioResponsive
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Litera DraftLoopioResponsive
Considered Multiple Products
Litera Draft

No answer on this topic

Loopio
Chose Loopio
At the time we evaluated both tools Loopio had a better pricing structure and the "magic" functionality was one of the main reasons we went with it.
Responsive
Chose Responsive
  • RFP360 - We used this tool for three years and it was a great first step/upgrade from a searchable Google doc. We decided to start evaluating other systems for a couple of reasons:
    • RFP360 is an end-to-end tool for RFP requestors and responders. We felt they were more focused on …
Chose Responsive
At the time, three years ago, we evaluated Loopio as an alternative to RFPIO. Loopio didn't have the same resources as far as dynamic branding, content segmentation ability and was less price competitive than RFPIO. RFPIO also has an unlimited user model where you are not …
Chose Responsive
Loopio is proposal management "lite" and seems to spend more on marketing than product upgrades.
Chose Responsive
Responsive is integral to how we work, replacing it was never an option due to how embedded we are with the platform.
Chose Responsive
We are a small proposal team, with a large group of resources who support our responses. Responsive is easy to use for internal and external users, doesn't require extensive onboarding for new users, and is constantly adding new capabilities and enhancements to make the product …
Chose Responsive
Responsive has better UI and pricing
Chose Responsive
RFPIO has outstanding, responsive, helpful customer support located in the US in Oregon. Support techs go the extra mile to help with basic issues and functionality training. Same-day support response and problem resolution are the norms. The system is also very user-friendly …
Chose Responsive
RFPIO's licensing model is a bit different from others which worked better for our organization. Rather than licensing by a number of users, it's licensed by the active project. This allows us to add multiple users that are responsible for reviewing and updating content without …
Features
Litera DraftLoopioResponsive
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Litera Draft
-
Ratings
Loopio
8.6
6 Ratings
9% above category average
Responsive
7.5
28 Ratings
4% below category average
Proposal branding00 Ratings8.46 Ratings7.515 Ratings
Proposal templates00 Ratings7.96 Ratings7.322 Ratings
Proposal content library updates00 Ratings9.26 Ratings6.728 Ratings
Guided proposal creation00 Ratings8.25 Ratings8.816 Ratings
Searchable proposal database00 Ratings9.46 Ratings7.026 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Litera Draft
-
Ratings
Loopio
8.3
6 Ratings
6% above category average
Responsive
7.8
27 Ratings
1% below category average
RFP management & response00 Ratings9.26 Ratings8.527 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval00 Ratings8.26 Ratings8.026 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls00 Ratings8.86 Ratings8.125 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow00 Ratings6.75 Ratings7.919 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface00 Ratings8.45 Ratings6.523 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Litera Draft
-
Ratings
Loopio
7.3
4 Ratings
8% below category average
Responsive
8.2
20 Ratings
4% above category average
Proposal distribution00 Ratings7.94 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Interactive proposals00 Ratings7.24 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Proposal content tracking00 Ratings6.94 Ratings8.518 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Litera DraftLoopioResponsive
Small Businesses
Jasper
Jasper
Score 8.3 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Grammarly
Grammarly
Score 9.1 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
ProWritingAid
ProWritingAid
Score 9.0 out of 10
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Litera DraftLoopioResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(5 ratings)
9.4
(7 ratings)
9.3
(21 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(16 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(2 ratings)
9.8
(17 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Litera DraftLoopioResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
Litera
Litera Desktop has many functions, but it is still a user-friendly program. Very easy to implement and easy to train. We send a variety of documents to clients and other legal professionals electronically. Litera will clean and scrub documents so that there is no hidden metadata when the documents are transferred. This keeps not only our clients and their files safe, but it keeps our email programs safe and clean as well.
Read full review
Loopio Inc.
I use Loopio specifically for RFP's mostly. I think it is a great and adequate tool for this and much of what I think that needs to improve are not large needle movers for me since the software as a whole is fantastic. It is very easy to upload an RFP into Loopio and begin answering those questions or pulling from previously answered questions. I also will use Loopio for large client proposals and I often use the "search functionality within Loopio to see if I can find answers to clients questions. I like that I can also pull images from Loopio as well and often use those visualizations in my proposals.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template.
Read full review
Pros
Litera
  • Clearly shows the changes between two documents using multiple colors of text and crossing-out and underlining.
  • Has diverse options for savings and sending the comparison document (Word, PDF and its own proprietary file format).
  • Has multiple options for letting you review each of the changes (in sequential order or by type of change).
Read full review
Loopio Inc.
  • Ease of use - a few minutes' tutorial is enough for a newcomer to start using the tool.
  • Handy options - i.e. support in searching for the right answer
  • Often meaningful & useful releases
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Live collaboration - the ability for multiple experts to simultaneously work on the same RFP.
  • Artificial intelligence - the ability for the product to continually learn what the best answers are and serve them up to our teams.
  • Dynamic branding - the ability for custom brand different templates by vertical, line of business, local branding, etc. with seamless transition.
  • Content review & moderation - the ability for our national content team to bulk review, edit and share content with our teams in a methodical way.
Read full review
Cons
Litera
  • It is the best when comparing any text or fragment of any content.
  • It helps us to better understand the purchases at the moment of making a move in our newsroom.
  • Its compatibility with other systems is very effective and safe, it makes us communicate safely.
Read full review
Loopio Inc.
  • Adding new answers to the library was easier and better with the "close the loop" functionality. Now, it seems like it is easier to miss questions to add to the library.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Reporting and Analytics is basic, you can purchase advanced analytics though
  • It would have been nice to have a set structure in mind or a example/case study to structure our responses in the most appropriate way, but we are working through that with their stellar support team
  • Really great new features, but expensive
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Litera
No answers on this topic
Loopio Inc.
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
This tool has been fantastic as we have revamped our RFP process. We are much faster and far more efficient.Our win rate is up, but I am not 100% sure this is the cause, but I love to see it. The customer support and training are also fantastic. Thumbs up!
Read full review
Usability
Litera
They have done a good job of now overloading Workshare Compare with extra features it doesn't need. This does a couple of things:
  1. It means the interface doesn't have too many menus or too many buttons to click. Everything is straightforward and easy to use.
  2. It keeps the software fast.
  3. It makes it easy on the user to decide when you do and do not need to use this software.
Read full review
Loopio Inc.
Usability is good but falls short of excellent. The interface is clean and well organized. They clearly spent some time working on the UI and took some feedback from focus groups to help keep it tidy. On a few occasions, we have experienced a little bit of lag while updating the question database. I'd like to see just a little faster response time on a consistent basis.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
Very easy to navigate and use. Very intuitive user interface
Read full review
Performance
Litera
I gave Workshare Compare such a high rating because I don't think I could do my job without it. It has just become so integral to my workflow, that if I were to ever change jobs I think I would have to insist my new employer to me a license. It is fast and just works 99% of the time. It is very rare that it gives me errors, and when it does it's likely because the underlying document is corrupted, not because of any issues with Workshare Compare.
Read full review
Loopio Inc.
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Litera
No answers on this topic
Loopio Inc.
They're very supportive and reply in a timely manner. Whenever I contacted the support I received a helpful reply that actually solved my issue. Quite often when my team suggested an improvement that would simplify and speed up our work it happened not long after which is perfect for us.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
The team at RFPIO is extremely responsive. If I email our account manager or report a bug, I usually hear back within two hours. Additionally, they are quick to make software adjustments based on customer requests and needs. We had a really complicated Excel sheet that their team ended up having to upload for me because of the amount of manual work I was doing. Based on that, they updated the software within two release cycles to make the process more automated, so that future Excel uploads would be more streamlined. I have also had several suggestions implemented rather quickly, and they don't hesitate to reach out for clarification when needed.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Litera
No answers on this topic
Loopio Inc.
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Litera
The interaction that can be done within this software is very different from the others. One of the most important is that it is dedicated to quickly and easily summarize the work of comparing files, without having to work a lot to do it. Also, it is a program that helps to discover the direct opinion among the users of these documents.
Read full review
Loopio Inc.
  • User friendly--very simple
  • Reviews of libraries can be assigned
  • Non-named user licenses can be used by various people
  • Close Loop--changes can be added to library with just a few clicks
  • View text in library and can copy content
  • Reporting on reviews and usage and projects
  • Help center and assigned representative
  • Library duplicates functionality
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
I was not involved in the process of selecting RFP360 for our firm, so I am largely unfamiliar with competitors. I am, however, quite pleased with RFP360 as a user, and am confident that my colleagues who were responsible for making the decision were thorough and discerning.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Litera
  • Document Security is of paramount concern and Workshare 9 is a workhorse.
  • Accuracy of Document Comparison is also a a critically important task and it is done to perfection.
Read full review
Loopio Inc.
  • I have saved hundreds of hours working in Loopio instead of answering RFP's on my own. This has allowed me to spend other hours elsewhere. Having an RFP management tool has been an incredible timesaver
  • The creation and management of questions has also saved me hours of time in searching out tough questions to answer and has also saved my colleagues time as well since we don't need to collaborate to find answers.
  • Have had some issues with downloading the proposal in a readable format for clients to view. I've sometimes had to go back and figure out what went wrong when exporting which can be frustrating- especially when dealing with very tight deadlines.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Library Health Dashboard is helpful in reducing time to clean up content but could use additional improvement by showing more granular data instead of a global assessment like good, poor, moderate.
  • ROI is reduced for us because of additional cost for using AI
  • Overall, Responsive has significantly improved our proposal process.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Responsive Screenshots

Screenshot of a view of the platformScreenshot of an AI generated responseScreenshot of some of the available customer resourcesScreenshot of some of the available integrationsScreenshot of a promotional flyerScreenshot of an example of the AI augmented content management feature