Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Load Focus
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Load Focus is a cloud testing tool designed to run performance tests and load tests for Web Applications, Websites and API Endpoints with thousands of concurrent users from any world location.
$69
per month
Monetate
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Monetate (formerly Kibo Personalization, powered by Monetate and Certona) is an ecommerce personalization software for consumer-facing brands. Monetate enables brands to create individualized experiences for site visitors, with the goal of improving engagement and business performance. Founded in 2008, Monetate services Adidas, Lufthansa, Office Depot, Reebok, Wolseley, and other companies.N/A
LoadRunner Professional
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
A solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A
Pricing
Load FocusMonetateOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Editions & Modules
Basic
$69
per month
Pro
$349
per month
Business
$899
per month
Enterprise
$999
per month
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Load FocusMonetateLoadRunner Professional
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTry LoadFocus for FREE now. Settle for your own plan later. Cancel anytime.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Load FocusMonetateOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Features
Load FocusMonetateOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
Load Focus
-
Ratings
Monetate
-
Ratings
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
8.4
6 Ratings
1% below category average
End to end performance management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Integrated performance data00 Ratings00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Real time monitoring00 Ratings00 Ratings6.15 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection00 Ratings00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Load FocusMonetateOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Bloomreach
Bloomreach
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Load FocusMonetateOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
5.6
(117 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(24 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(17 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(16 ratings)
3.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
5.8
(15 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Load FocusMonetateOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Likelihood to Recommend
Load Focus
No answers on this topic
Monetate
Monetate is a fully functional space to generate multiple marketing campaigns for your company on the web, many of the functions found in this program are a contribution to manage your content correctly and give it the space you are looking for, we We recommend it one hundred percent. We feel very comfortable with everything we have been able to achieve thanks to this program.
Read full review
OpenText
Micro Focus LoadRunner and its suite of tools, specifically VuGen works wonderfully for us for all web, http/https and web service calls. We've been able to build tests for near any scenario we need with relative ease. As long as we have crafted up requirements for our scenarios / scripts to managed scope, we've had high success working with scripting and data driving. Our main tests are web service calls - typically chained together to form a full scenario with transactions measuring the journey or a similar (measure along the way) journey through a browser. For web services we will use VuGen and browser we've shifted to Tru Client I have had little-to-no experience scripting against a thick client where a ui-driven test would be required. I know its possible but quite costly due to the need to run the actual desktop client to drive tests. We've been fortunate enough to leverage http calls to represent client traffic.
Read full review
Pros
Load Focus
No answers on this topic
Monetate
  • Audience segmentation is relatively painless. They provide a robust way to granularly target visitors by device type, location, weather, demographics, etc.
  • Our CSM has been very engaged and detailed in supporting our partnership. She provides very prompt responses and clearly works hard to push the Kibo team when possible.
  • The User Interface to develop new actions is not terrible.
  • Supports Single Sign On, which is the preferred method of managing users at my organization.
Read full review
OpenText
  • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
  • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
  • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
Read full review
Cons
Load Focus
No answers on this topic
Monetate
  • We'd like to be able to use the Monetate resources to help us set up tests that require web dev (to get it out of our backlog), but they also have wait times similar to our internal ones. I realize resources are hard to come by, but this is an area we'd love to be able to utilize more if the turnaround were quicker.
  • IE is always a problem. I know it's not Monetate-specific though, and many tools struggle with IE.
  • We have a large percentage of our users who use IE, and I'd like to provide more experiences in IE without and additional hassle.
Read full review
OpenText
  • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
  • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
  • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
  • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Load Focus
No answers on this topic
Monetate
I had never worked within a company that had a tool like this. It made my life as a designer and a creative manager much easier with it's easy to use interface and limitless possibilities in terms of creative. I would highly recommend taking Monetate for a test drive, you will not be disappointed.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Usability
Load Focus
No answers on this topic
Monetate
Part of what I love about Monetate is how intuitive the tool is. Very very easy to use - based on the basics - Who/What/When/Where concept. Anyone can jump right in and start using the tool. And very easy to copy campaigns and tweak to continue to build experiences. We recently added Monetate on mobile and similar experience - easy to jump back and forth between platforms. Also love the analytics dashboard...easily quantifiable and easy to get tidbits that are digestible for others not as familiar with tool.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Load Focus
No answers on this topic
Monetate
Monetate support team meets with use weekly, answers emails daily and promptly. They are proactive about getting answers for us when we need it and offering suggestions based on observations they have or learnings they want to share from other partners. Monetate's support is top notch.
Read full review
OpenText
Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Load Focus
No answers on this topic
Monetate
Monetate installs easily and sets up personalization with just a few clicks. We never used the recommendation engine but the multivariant testing was great.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Load Focus
No answers on this topic
Monetate
At the time of selection, it was the best tool to fit our business needs. The day-to-day users were able to create some experiences on their own and did not require much oversight. We also had developer support built into our contract along with internal developer support so most experiences were achievable. We believed it was as good and in some ways better than the other comparable tools on the market.
Read full review
OpenText
HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Load Focus
No answers on this topic
Monetate
  • We are really starting to understand our audience and what they prefer on our website. One example is on our product display pages, we learned that our visitors convert about 35% more when content is laid out in one fashion versus another. Another example is our promotional banners perform better when it takes up the width of the page versus the margins pulled in more.
  • At first, Monetate was a negative ROI - we were paying for a service we weren't getting, and not understanding the full power of the program. With the new optimization firm however, we are now really able to churn out more tests, have a clean and direct test plan, and finally seeing tangible results.
  • As an aside, Monetate has helped us just save time and money on creating our promotional banners now so we don't have to get with our development team each time we want to put one up. Even without running a test, it has let us add content to our site when we need to (as we already have the experiments set up as we need it to and we can quickly duplicate it) without our developers getting in there to make those short-lived changes.
Read full review
OpenText
  • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
  • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
Read full review
ScreenShots