Lua is a mobile-first enterprise communication solution. It powers messaging that is built for business: instant, secure, and keeps everyone accountable. Some key features include: Real-time Secure Messaging, Two-touch Conference Calling, and an Analytics Dashboard.
$0
Per User per Month
Microsoft Viva Engage
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Viva Engage, formerly Yammer, is used for private communication within organizations or between organizational members and pre-designated groups.
$24
per year per user
Socialcast (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Socialcast was an enterprise social networking and collaboration platform acquired by VMware in 2011. The platform allowed an organization's employees to share information and documents with co-workers in real time through a Facebook- or Twitter-like news feed. VMware announced its end of availability (EOA) effective May 2018.
$250
per month
Pricing
Lua
Microsoft Viva Engage
Socialcast (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Lua
Per User per Month
Microsoft Viva Employee Communications and Communities
$24
per year per user
Microsoft Viva Suite
$144
per year per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lua
Microsoft Viva Engage
Socialcast (discontinued)
Free Trial
Yes
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$2,500
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Microsoft Viva Engage is also available in some Microsoft 365 packages.
blueKiwi : yammer does well in terms of user experience, initial ram, up, but less so in total feature set Jive: since Yammer is SaaS, some customers will be unable to use yammer Sharepoint: although not a direct competitor, Microsofts own solution has some overlap on Yammer as …
Socialcast (discontinued)
No answer on this topic
Features
Lua
Microsoft Viva Engage
Socialcast (discontinued)
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Lua
7.0
1 Ratings
13% below category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
8.6
49 Ratings
7% above category average
Socialcast (discontinued)
7.5
4 Ratings
7% below category average
Chat
7.01 Ratings
9.344 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Notifications
7.01 Ratings
8.449 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
9.648 Ratings
8.14 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
9.238 Ratings
8.73 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
9.338 Ratings
6.14 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
00 Ratings
7.314 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
00 Ratings
6.713 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
00 Ratings
8.632 Ratings
7.92 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Lua
-
Ratings
Microsoft Viva Engage
8.3
46 Ratings
6% above category average
Socialcast (discontinued)
6.3
4 Ratings
21% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.828 Ratings
7.74 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.515 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.023 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
7.723 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.843 Ratings
3.83 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
8.143 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
8.426 Ratings
3.43 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
I wouldn't recommend Lua because they were recently acquired by another company and will be shutting down. It was unfortunate that we were only given 2 months notice right after signing up for another 1-year term.
Yammer is great when you have a company culture that encourages friendly collaboration and communication. It can be a great supplement (but certainly not a substitute) for bonding and sharing ideas and thoughts. Certain channels can be really successful, too, like a channel where people can post dog pictures or something fun like that!
Socialcast has been a great tool for FactSet. I would recommend it to any firm looking for an easy-to-use tool to centralize communication and collaborate on a global scale.
Socialcast has an exceptional user experience. With very few idiosyncrasies, it works well on every platform I've tried.
The platform has such a high level of ease of use, it becomes somewhat addicting.
Social analytics are superb.
The platform is highly intuitive and requires zero training or coaching in order for network members to become productive with it.
It's extremely reliable. Only once in 4 years, was the product not available, and that was only for about a half-hour. In that half-hour, we realized how dependent we were on it. (Very.)
The multi-device and deployment options are excellent. On-premise, Private Cloud, and Multi-tenant SaaS all available.
The mobile apps for iPhone, tablets, and Android render well with a beautiful UI/UX. The desktop AIR app is equally highly usable.
Although the social enterprise network works very well, there is room for some slight improvement - such as the ability to attract users. By being part of the Microsoft Office Suite, it is offered as an "add-on" and many overlook it and see it as unnecessary at first. It would be smart for Microsoft to sell it as its own product so it could gather more popularity as a "social network".
Giving an option to filter results could be better as well as giving an option to turn off the "recent activity" bar on the home page.
Microsoft is dedicated to continual improvement on Yammer. They realize the value that Yammer brings to the table with their clients. In the short time that we have had Yammer implemented, we are just now beginning to see the strong impact it has on becoming more effective and efficient around collaboration.
Beyond the value FactSet derives from using the platform, Socialcast (the firm) has been a good partner to FactSet. We've experienced very little downtime with the service and they have been responsive and fair with enhancement requests and questions
Overall easy to use and intuitive, although limited in the possibility to personalize layout and look & feel of a site. Some functionalities are not easy to use, like document editing, but some others are quick and effective (posts and tagging above all). Performance and responsiveness of the Yammer site is typically acceptable, in my experience.
We have never had to use the support for Yammer. The tool works well and we have not come across any bugs. User Interface is simple and easy to use, similar to other forum type products, thereby removing the need for any extensive training. Team members are invited in and immediately are able to start using the tool.
Our team briefly used Salesforce.com's Chatter product before switching over to Yammer in 2012. While Chatter is essentially the same product as Yammer, it left much to be desired. Chatter's design was (and remains) clunky and difficult to navigate. Yammer is a simple, easy-to-use product that offers similar functionality as Salesforce's Chatter.
My company is pleased with the positive impact Yammer has created departmentally and on an individual basis with work flow efficiency.
Adversely, most old and new employees are more familiar with SharePoint, causing the company to pay for training for all current and incoming employees.
As Yammer becomes more widely used, the need for training may diminish, which is where we will see our return on investment, as the product clearly provides a more effective form of file sharing and communication between employees and their department.