Founded in Switzerland in 1997, Magnolia is a CMS used to build composable digital experiences. Magnolia helps create fully integrated customer experiences and speeds up digital delivery of content. Magnolia boasts 480 enterprise customers, thousands of Community Edition deployments, and more than 200 certified Magnolia Partners around the world. They further state that their enterprise customers include Sanofi, Generali, the Atlassian, The New York Times, Harley Davidson, and Union…
$3,500
per month
Agentforce Commerce
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce (formerly Commerce Cloud, and Demandware before that) is a cloud-based eCommerce solution for enterprises with merchandising tools, such as sorting, filtering, and image zooming, allowing customers to browse products.
$4
per month
Pricing
Magnolia
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
Editions & Modules
DX Core
$3500
per month
DX Cloud
$6000
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Magnolia
Agentforce Commerce
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
B2B Commerce:
Starter - $4 price/order
Growth - $6 price/order
Plus - $8 price/order
B2C Commerce:
Starter - 1% Gross Merchandise Value
Growth - 2% Gross Merchandise Value
Plus - 3% Gross Merchandise Value
B2B2C Commerce:
1% Gross Merchandise Value
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Magnolia
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
Features
Magnolia
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Magnolia
8.0
69 Ratings
3% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.069 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Magnolia
8.1
68 Ratings
4% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
-
Ratings
API
8.561 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
7.661 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Magnolia
8.0
74 Ratings
3% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor
8.565 Ratings
00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
8.465 Ratings
00 Ratings
Admin section
8.070 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page templates
8.972 Ratings
00 Ratings
Library of website themes
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
8.563 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publishing workflow
7.573 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form generator
6.958 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Magnolia
7.5
69 Ratings
1% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy
7.663 Ratings
00 Ratings
SEO support
7.263 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bulk management
7.757 Ratings
00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
7.962 Ratings
00 Ratings
Community / comment management
6.951 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Storefront
Comparison of Online Storefront features of Product A and Product B
Magnolia
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
8.7
44 Ratings
11% above category average
Product catalog & listings
00 Ratings
9.139 Ratings
Product management
00 Ratings
9.239 Ratings
Bulk product upload
00 Ratings
7.938 Ratings
Branding
00 Ratings
8.839 Ratings
Mobile storefront
00 Ratings
8.935 Ratings
Product variations
00 Ratings
9.041 Ratings
Website integration
00 Ratings
8.339 Ratings
Visual customization
00 Ratings
7.840 Ratings
CMS
00 Ratings
9.237 Ratings
Online Shopping Cart
Comparison of Online Shopping Cart features of Product A and Product B
Magnolia
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
8.7
34 Ratings
13% above category average
Abandoned cart recovery
00 Ratings
8.528 Ratings
Checkout user experience
00 Ratings
8.834 Ratings
Online Payment System
Comparison of Online Payment System features of Product A and Product B
Magnolia
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
9.1
33 Ratings
9% above category average
eCommerce security
00 Ratings
9.133 Ratings
eCommerce Marketing
Comparison of eCommerce Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Magnolia
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Commerce
8.1
38 Ratings
5% above category average
Promotions & discounts
00 Ratings
8.536 Ratings
Personalized recommendations
00 Ratings
7.938 Ratings
SEO
00 Ratings
7.933 Ratings
eCommerce Business Management
Comparison of eCommerce Business Management features of Product A and Product B
Magnolia is a very capable DXP, that provides client with lots of flexibility in composing its own stack. While the core of the platform is a content management system, the open architecture of Magnolia DXP allows it to connect to any platform, allowing client to extend the capabilities. One scenario would be a centralized content hub - where through a single platform, content authors can choose which channel to distribute what content. For example, long form content for consumers viewing on a laptop, short form content for those using a mobile browser. This allow the client to personalized the experience based on channels. Another scenarios would be leveraging on GenAI - using Magnolia's built-in connector to ChatGPT. If that is not the service that one desire, you can always connect to another AI service such as Google Gemini. With GenAI, connected, content author can use AI as co-pilot to help them scale up their content production.
Global Sites; larger commerce organizations but not too large where the % rev-share would affect its feasibility in a feature comparison. Salesforce is rock solid in infrastructure and rarely has outages or issues; it scaled appropriately for holiday peak and was able to accomplish anything we put our minds to as long as we staffed development appropriately. The latter, however, is not to be overlooked. Developers are necessary and expensive.
Speed of development - time to delivery from zero to MVP was excellent
Ease of use - the authoring experience is very easy to build and train
PAAS/SAAS - the managed service platform removed the traditional overhead of running in-house technologies, meaning we could focus on value add, with less time spent keeping the lights on.
Traffic - When we have sales, our traffic will increase exponentially and their cloud can handle the huge uptick in traffic we receive without overloading our servers.
Site updates - it continually monitors in the background for any upgrades or updates needed so we don't have to go in and do it ourselves. A real time saver!
Integration - outside plugins and add-ons are easy to install with Salesforce commerce cloud as it allows a seamless integration of extra plug ins onto our site.
The documentation provides samples that are often out of context, and difficult to know where the provided example code should be implemented. More tutorials providing the full project or step-by-step instructions on how to implement subject material would help greatly. Baeldung is a resource I would consider the gold standard in how this is done in other spaces.
The use of JCR and Nodes makes object serialization/deserialization painful. Jackson compatibility or similar would be a welcome enhancement to the developer experience. Maybe leveraging code-gen from light modules to build model classes when possible could help accomplish this.
Modifying the home layout from light modules is frustrating. It seems that any configuration overrides made merge with the default rather than overwriting, which makes for a difficult combination of guess-and-check while referencing the documentation to see what should be in each row/column when making changes.
Including "mark all as read" or "delete all" in the notifications app would be a great quality of life improvement. It seems that by default, users have to individually select messages and operate them.
The UX within the Business Manager portion of Demandware, the primary interface for marketers, is generally a confusing, inconsistent mess. Particularly infuriating are the lack of consistency for search and sort behavior within the tool.
A number of useful features, such as the ability to set schedules or tie features to unique customer segments, have seemingly arbitrary limitations imposed.
Demandware's idea of leveraging the community to be a learning resource and a sounding board for new ideas and features is a nice theory, but in practice it doesn't work for businesses with a lot of customization. I'm left with the impression that individual support is not a priority.
A huge factor influencing our decision to remain on the Demandware platform is that our new parent company is standardizing all its luxury brands in the US on it. We are fortunate. However, even if we had remained an independent company, I believe we would continue on the Demandware platform for all the reasons outlined in this review. I appreciate the stability the platform has provided to our eCommerce site in the last three years as well as the continuous improvements and technological advances being rolled out that will allow us to keep the site fresh, engaging, modern and stable. I've heard many horror stories from colleagues on other platforms who struggle with the expense and complexity involved with making what should be minor and simple changes and updates to their sites.
We've shown it to a number of users both clients and our own team and despite initial apprehensions, they "get it" very quickly. It's intuitive and friendly and quick to perform daily tasks. We once had a client tell us "Using Magnolia makes me smile" which says it all for us.
The overall ease of using the system. Consolidation in location for our team members. Mobile application for on the go research, as many of our team members are constantly traveling to job sites or to meet clients. No more duplicate calls to current customers, since we have 12 different divisions that span the company. Mostly the ability to look at the database when our team members begin cultivating a new lead/prospect with a potential customer to see if anyone within the team has a relationship with that person or the company they work for.
I gave [it] 7/10 only because of the loading time of pages. Otherwise, I think it deserves an 8. Normally this is not an issue per [se] but considering the rating matrix and as I have been asked to honestly write about it. Yes, the page loading times could be improved.
You always get an answer based on your SLA. But you always get a solution. That's the successfactor in this case. To often i was frustrated about people in a company without even a clue what there product is about or how to solve a problem. Magnolia's Support Team does a very good job and try to help you in most of the cases
They are very responsive and a support technician will be assigned quickly. Even if there is further clarification needed for the ticket, or a solution is not immediately available, you feel that someone is there and staying on top of the issue. Most common issues are resolved quickly and satisfactorily.
I've used several CMSs like AEM and EpiServer, and comparatively, they all excel at different things. Magnolia is the best to develop for/against. Episerver has the best/most fluid UI in terms of content editing, and the overall admin experience AEM is just all around sucks.
When I think of Salesforce products, I sometimes think of them interchangeably as one big lump. It's hard not to be incredibly immersed in the ecosystem day in and day out and taking advantage of resources like Trailhead. While Microsoft Dynamics compares in quality and offerings, it doesn't offer the same engagement and resources as Salesforce in its communications, social, and marketing, which makes a difference in terms of relevance and help. Commerce Cloud comes with the support you need to succeed and the tools you need to grow. In a high demand consumer world, we need products like this to keep up and get ahead. The minute we catch up, we're behind. Salesforce helps you stay on pace and create the unique and personalized experiences customers everywhere expect.
Magnolia has brought about positive impacts. For instance, we need not outsource web design and marketing services because thanks to this software, we can handle most work inhouse
The software is affordable with no compromises on capabilities and therefore it is gives us value for money.