ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes vs. Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
ThreatDown replaces the former Malwarebytes for Business product suite, combining Malwarebytes' endpoint security capabilities in four bundles. The basic Core tier includes incident response, Next-gen AV, device control, vulnerability assessments, and the ability to block unwanted application. Higher tiers include EDR and MDR services, managed threat hunting, patch management, website content filtering.
$207
per year 3 devices (minimum)
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull (TRAP) enables messaging and security administrators to automatically retract threats delivered to employee inboxes and emails that turn malicious after delivery to quarantine. It is also a powerful solution to retract messages sent in error as well as inappropriate, malicious, or emails containing compliance violations and also follows forwarded mail and distribution lists and creates an audit-able activity trail. With Proofpoint Threat Response…N/A
Pricing
ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Editions & Modules
Core
$69
per year per endpoint
Advanced
$79
per year per endpoint
Elite
$99
per year per endpoint
Ultimate
$119
per year per endpoint
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsOptional Add-Ons include server and mobile device protection. Server protection ranges from $129 to $179 per annum depending on service tier. Mobile security is $10 per device, no matter the service tier.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
8.8
12 Ratings
4% above category average
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
-
Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology8.311 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)8.312 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Management8.312 Ratings00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support9.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Infection Remediation9.911 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management8.310 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware Detection8.312 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident Response Platforms
Comparison of Incident Response Platforms features of Product A and Product B
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
-
Ratings
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
8.4
3 Ratings
1% below category average
Integration with Other Security Systems00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Attack Chain Visualization00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Centralized Dashboard00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Machine Learning to Prevent Incidents00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Live Response for Rapid Remediation00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Small Businesses
SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 9.1 out of 10
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 8.7 out of 10
Hoxhunt
Hoxhunt
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(12 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.2
(4 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Likelihood to Recommend
Malwarebytes
I think Malwarebytes is the best anti-malware company. I think it is well-suited for any situation and any device. I think Malwarebytes does the best on Windows and on MacOS. Also, Malwarebytes is always improving, and you can tell they are a company that stays on top of cybersecurity trends. If you have a tight budget or looking for the cheapest solution, then Malwarebytes may not be the solution for you. To clarify, I don't think Malwarebytes is that much more expensive compared to its closest competitors.
Read full review
Proofpoint
If your email admins spend time manually pulling malicious emails, this tool will save them countless hours of work and will do it for them 24 x 7. So if a user receives a malicious email after-hours, TRAP will auto pull it from the affected user's mailbox and potentially save you from an IT disaster.
Read full review
Pros
Malwarebytes
  • Protects against malware - No matter how much training you give end users on social hacking, there is always a breach at some point.
  • Protects against ransomware - Ransomware could spell disaster for a company...it could literally shut the doors for good.
  • Centralized administration - Without a terrific centralized method to manage all the systems being protected, it would require an extra position just to maintain all endpoints.
Read full review
Proofpoint
  • Auto pull works great, even with our hybrid situation with 2 on premise exchange organizations.
  • Reporting is good, nice graphs of all the actions.
Read full review
Cons
Malwarebytes
  • When you push install to clients, sometimes it will fail with generic errors, and it's hard to find out what is the cause of failure. Fortunately, it doesn't require too many changes on the client-side but it takes time to figure it out.
  • When we bought it, we had an option to buy it with email support or phone support. The phone support was very high priced, so we ended up buying email support. when we experience any issues, it takes a long time to get a resolution. Fortunately, we haven't used their support much.
  • It had a few incidents with false calls. We are using software that generates reports in MS Word format. The software will call Word to open with a report, but the anti-exploit will consider this as a threat and will block the function. You can put Word in an exception but it won't protect Word from a real exploit in the future.
Read full review
Proofpoint
  • Learning curve is steep.
  • Interface can be clunky.
  • Some interface items seem counter-intuitive.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Malwarebytes
The renewal decision is not up to me and also, the current economic situation might not allow renewal
Read full review
Proofpoint
No answers on this topic
Usability
Malwarebytes
The software is very easy to manage. In 4 years, we hardly have experienced any issues. It simply works.
Read full review
Proofpoint
It's easy to use and requires very little administrator hands on.
Read full review
Support Rating
Malwarebytes
Whenever I've had a query for the support team, they have got back to me very quickly, and given me very well detailed advice on fixing whatever the issue I had was. They also pointed me to help documents and such where I could find more information if I needed
Read full review
Proofpoint
They are quick to respond and have talented support personnel.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Malwarebytes
It's no contest. Cisco AMP, Umbrella and Endpoint use vast amounts of resources and provide little protection when compared with Malwarebytes. One client recently replaced Cisco with MWB and found over 7,300 vulnerabilities on 352 endpoints, including 120 listed as Critical and 7,180 listed as High, with CVE's dating back to 2008.
Read full review
Proofpoint
I have never evaluated TRAP against another product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Malwarebytes
  • Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection has had a HUGE positive impact on our ROI as we eliminated the need for an entire server, CALs & other licenses as well.
  • We are saving a lot of time on the management side of Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection as compared to others as it is cloud based and we are able to manage it from everywhere and not just one server. This has improved our performance and reduced expenses as well.
Read full review
Proofpoint
  • Chances of phishing attacks has decreased.
  • Your employees don't have to do anything, so no impact on productivity.
Read full review
ScreenShots