TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

ManageEngine OpManager vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ManageEngine OpManager

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AManageEngine's OpManager is network performance monitoring software.

    $95

    per year

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A
    Pricing
    ManageEngine OpManagerOpenText Application Quality Management
    Editions & Modules
    Standard Edition
    $245
    for 10 devices
    Professional Edition
    $345
    for 10 devices
    Enterprise Edition
    11,545
    for 250 devices
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ManageEngine OpManagerOpenText Application Quality Management
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup Fee$245 per installationOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ManageEngine OpManagerOpenText Application Quality Management
    Considered Both Products
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    98%
    Would buy again
    43 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    43 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    44 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    37 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    43 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    ManageEngine OpManagerOpenText Application Quality Management
    Network Performance Monitoring
    Comparison of Network Performance Monitoring features of ManageEngine OpManager and OpenText Application Quality Management
    Feature
    ManageEngine OpManager
    8.5
    45 Ratings
    7% above category average
    OpenText Application Quality Management
    -
    Ratings
    Automated network device discovery8.944 Ratings00 Ratings
    Network monitoring9.242 Ratings00 Ratings
    Baseline threshold calculation7.441 Ratings00 Ratings
    Alerts9.244 Ratings00 Ratings
    Network capacity planning7.333 Ratings00 Ratings
    Packet capture analysis8.930 Ratings00 Ratings
    Network mapping8.334 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable reports8.643 Ratings00 Ratings
    Wireless infrastructure monitoring7.731 Ratings00 Ratings
    Hardware health monitoring9.245 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ManageEngine OpManagerOpenText Application Quality Management
    Small Businesses
    Auvik
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    PingPlotter
    Score9 out of 10
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Nmap
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ManageEngine OpManagerOpenText Application Quality Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.6
    (45 ratings)
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    8.9
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.1
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ManageEngine OpManagerOpenText Application Quality Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    Manage Engine OpManager is better suited to serve server and network admins at organization to monitor their servers and network devices. It helps us with compliance with the reports available like utilization reports and capacity planning reports. It helps you to keep track of what all process are consuming the resources. It helps you in monitoring what is happening in your switches, routers and firewall
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • It measures the CPU utilization of hosts, the network bandwidth utilization of links, and other aspects of the operation
    • It often sends messages—sometimes called watchdog messages—over the network to each host to verify if it is responsive to requests.
    • Set Up Notifications And Reports.
    • OpManager offers a set of advantages that allow it to adapt to the needs of the company, guaranteeing effective monitoring of the application networks used in our organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • Alerts has to be configured correctly otherwise unnecessary bombarding of alerts can cause inconvenience.
    • The server on which ManageEngine OpManager is to be deployed should have higher resources as monitoring a large number of devices may slow down the performance of the system.
    • Configuring the advanced features may require a learning curve.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    This product works very well for our organization, and it would be hard to not have a tool like this going forward
    Read full review
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    The rating I provided is based on the product quality, experience (I have been using OpManager for almost the last 4 years), and relevance of the information/response I generated through Manage Engine OpManager. I have also received good support from OpManager.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    At first, we were not able to add our Avaya switches to the configuration backup module, our partner tried to help, but they did not find the solution, we had one remote session with tech support of ME and they solve the problem.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    During our competitive analysis, we found ManageEngine OpManager was not expensive compared to other vendors. At the same time, there was no compromise on the features such as customized reporting or configuring alerts per our clientele's unique requirements. These are our client words "Other vendors ask us to pay more $$$ for enabling additional email alerts".
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • I don't know if you can calculate ROI with a monitoring solution, there are more factors to calculate.
    • We found a really big problem with a network switch (faulty transceiver) in a trunk configuration with OPManager. this caused us serial troubles with the overall network stability.
    • We are loosing around € 3.000 to 5.000 per hour if our network is not working so this was a great help to fix this issue
    • Our label printers are really important to monitoring in our warehouse system, this makes OPManager a great solution for that
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    ManageEngine OpManager Screenshots

    Screenshot of OpManager's DashboardScreenshot of OpManager's realtime graphsScreenshot of a device snapshot page in OpManagerScreenshot of Alarms in OpManager